On Thu, 30 May 2013 08:27:38 -0600
Martin Sebor mse...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/30/2013 06:04 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On May 29, 2013, at 5:55 PM, Martin Sebor mse...@gmail.com wrote:
But to be chair, one needs to be a member of the foundation.
That's not true.
It would certainly
On 8/28/2012 8:23 AM, Liviu Nicoara wrote:
Hi,
I need assistance with the resetting of my account, lnicoara at apache.
I cannot reset my password via https://id.apache.org because I do not have
the backup
email account anymore, where the reset information is sent.
Thanks in advance.
On 5/16/2012 1:08 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On May 16, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Travis Vitek
travis.vi...@roguewave.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Stefan Teleman stefan.tele...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am going to ask the
The largest argument for no-action at this time is that
1. there are new (previously non-committer/non-pmc) individuals
who are willing to actively manage the project
2. were they to simply re-form around this archived code after
the fact, moving code from a tlp - attic, attic -
On 2/14/2012 1:10 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
I sent our report in late last night. Perhaps it's stuck in
the moderation queue.
The report was accepted, the board recognized the project's
intent to reconstitute itself, and expressed no specific concerns
at this time. Additional March/April reports
On 2/5/2012 10:36 AM, Wojciech Meyer wrote:
Hi all,
-1
This is partially because stdcxx is still considered to be a derivate
implementation of RogueWave in ARM toolchain, so upgrading at some
point would have had a smaller impact on our customers than porting
the toolchain into another
Fans and contributors,
it appears that the stdcxx project is entirely dormant. The ASF has
launched a new 'Attic' project over the past two years, to neatly
retire dormant works until and unless a community comes along who
wishes to revive the effort.
As a simple formality your votes please;
On 2/2/2012 2:17 PM, Andrew Black wrote:
While I am not completely familiar with the process, I took a couple minutes
to look at
the website for the Attic project ( http://attic.apache.org/ ), and I thought
I'd
summarize the implications of this move as I understand them.
Good summary.
*
Martin Sebor wrote:
Is everyone here subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or should
I continue to forward these updates?
All are; it's a mandatory subscription that only falls apart if your
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .forward file is out of date.
Bill
Martin Sebor wrote:
Farid Zaripov wrote:
For now we are supporting four versions of the MSVC starting from 7.0.
The MSVC 7.0 doesn't supports the modern C++ features and I propose
to discontinue supporting of this compiler in stdcxx 4.3 version.
Everyone is encouraged to vote, including
Martin Sebor wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
With MS awakening to the significance of free compilers on every
real operating system, they've blinked, and made that headache
dissolve for us.
Now if they would only awaken to the importance of standards like
C99 and POSIX they would make
11 matches
Mail list logo
