[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kai Sasaki reassigned STORM-671:
Assignee: Kai Sasaki
> Measure tuple serialization/deserialization latency.
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sriharsha Chintalapani updated STORM-678:
-
Summary: Storm UI Spengo filter doesn't invalidate user session
immediately upon k
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14327025#comment-14327025
]
Sriharsha Chintalapani edited comment on STORM-678 at 2/19/15 5:56 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sriharsha Chintalapani resolved STORM-678.
--
Resolution: Not a Problem
Assignee: Sriharsha Chintalapani
> Storm UI Spen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14327025#comment-14327025
]
Sriharsha Chintalapani commented on STORM-678:
--
[~manishknema] Storm UI kerber
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sriharsha Chintalapani updated STORM-678:
-
Summary: Storm UI Spengo filter should provide a configurable
token.validity (was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326986#comment-14326986
]
Sriharsha Chintalapani commented on STORM-678:
--
[~manishknema] what you mean b
Manish Nema created STORM-678:
-
Summary: SPNEGO, Kerberos Delegation doesnt work in Storm UI
Key: STORM-678
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-678
Project: Apache Storm
Issue Type:
As a follow-up to the previous discussion regarding adopting project bylaws,
I’d like to start an official VOTE to formally adopt the bylaws as listed below.
Please vote on adopting the proposed bylaws.
[+1] Adopt the bylaws as listed
[+0] No opinion
[-1] Do not adopt the bylaws because…
This v
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326569#comment-14326569
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-329:
--
Github user ptgoetz commented on the pull requ
Github user ptgoetz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/429#issuecomment-74950459
For the build, I just ran `mvn clean install` at the top level of the
source tree.
For the repl, I ran (in the Intellij repl):
```
(load-file "/path/t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326559#comment-14326559
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-329:
--
Github user miguno commented on the pull reque
Github user miguno commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/429#issuecomment-74947350
What were the exact REPL and mvn commands?
> On 18.02.2015, at 21:48, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
>
> @miguno Regarding the merge to 0.9.x, I didn't have t
Github user ptgoetz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/429#issuecomment-74944765
@miguno Regarding the merge to 0.9.x, I didn't have that much time to debug
the test failures. There are 2 errors in `auth_test.clj` when run as part of
the maven build. W
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326533#comment-14326533
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-329:
--
Github user ptgoetz commented on the pull requ
Github user Parth-Brahmbhatt commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/374#issuecomment-74940637
@Crystark super sorry about this I am not sure how the heck did I miss
this. The code you pointed at is fine but I should be using executeBatch
instead of execut
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326412#comment-14326412
]
Michael Noll commented on STORM-677:
[~marz] FYI: I copied your feedback on the max ret
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326407#comment-14326407
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-329:
--
Github user miguno commented on the pull reque
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Noll updated STORM-677:
---
Description:
h3. Background
Storm currently supports the configuration setting
storm.messaging.netty.
Github user miguno commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/429#issuecomment-74927415
@nathanmarz Thanks for the detailed feedback on the max-retries issue. As
Bobby suggested, would you mind if we decouple the work on max-retries (tracked
at STORM-677) fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326374#comment-14326374
]
Robert Joseph Evans commented on STORM-677:
---
on https://github.com/apache/storm/p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326308#comment-14326308
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-329:
--
Github user revans2 commented on the pull requ
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/429#issuecomment-74917930
@nathanmarz I'd like to move the conversation over to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-677.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user nathanmarz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/429#issuecomment-74914806
Nimbus only knows a worker is having trouble when it stops sending
heartbeats. If a worker gets into a bad state, the worst thing to do is have it
continue trying to li
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326283#comment-14326283
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-329:
--
Github user nathanmarz commented on the pull r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326169#comment-14326169
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-329:
--
Github user miguno commented on the pull reque
Github user miguno commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/429#issuecomment-74898690
Thanks, Taylor! Let me know if I can help with sorting out the test
failures.
Also regarding JIRA: I forgot to mention that it looks like we need to
update STORM-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326160#comment-14326160
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-329:
--
Github user ptgoetz commented on the pull requ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Noll updated STORM-510:
---
Affects Version/s: 0.9.3
> Netty messaging client blocks transfer thread on reconnect
> ---
Github user ptgoetz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/429#issuecomment-74897829
@miguno No problem, I can do the merge to master. I've done a test merge to
the 0.9.3 branch, and it didn't seem too bad, but I'm still debugging some test
failures.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Noll updated STORM-404:
---
Affects Version/s: 0.9.3
> Worker on one machine crashes due to a failure of another worker on another
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Noll updated STORM-329:
---
Affects Version/s: (was: 0.10.0)
> Fix cascading Storm failure by improving reconnection strategy a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326157#comment-14326157
]
Michael Noll commented on STORM-404:
[~danielschonfeld] As Sean said, please take a loo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Noll updated STORM-677:
---
Description:
h3. Background
Storm currently supports the configuration setting
storm.messaging.netty.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Noll updated STORM-329:
---
Fix Version/s: 0.10.0
> Fix cascading Storm failure by improving reconnection strategy and buffering
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Noll updated STORM-329:
---
Description:
_Note: The original title of this ticket was: "Add Option to Config Message
handling stra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326141#comment-14326141
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-329:
--
Github user miguno commented on the pull reque
Github user miguno commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/429#issuecomment-74895041
PS: We may also want to update the original
[STORM-329](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329) ticket description
to reflect the changes in this PR.
---
If your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Noll updated STORM-329:
---
Affects Version/s: 0.10.0
0.9.3
> Add Option to Config Message handling strategy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Noll updated STORM-329:
---
Priority: Major (was: Minor)
> Add Option to Config Message handling strategy when connection timeout
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326133#comment-14326133
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-329:
--
Github user miguno commented on the pull reque
Github user miguno commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/429#issuecomment-74894542
FYI: I created [STORM-677: Maximum retries strategy may cause data
loss](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-677) to address the issue
that Bobby brought up in this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326136#comment-14326136
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-329:
--
Github user miguno commented on the pull reque
Github user miguno commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/429#issuecomment-74894825
> I'd also like to apply it to the 0.9.x branch as I feel it's an important
fix.
That's a good idea, Taylor. Would you also like volunteer to merge this PR
in gen
Michael Noll created STORM-677:
--
Summary: Maximum retries strategy may cause data loss
Key: STORM-677
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-677
Project: Apache Storm
Issue Type: Bug
Sriharsha Chintalapani created STORM-676:
Summary: Storm Trident support sliding windows
Key: STORM-676
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-676
Project: Apache Storm
Issu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326056#comment-14326056
]
Zhong, Xiang commented on STORM-329:
I am out of office for Chinese new year from 2.18
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326048#comment-14326048
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-329:
--
Github user ptgoetz commented on the pull requ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14326039#comment-14326039
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-329:
--
Github user ptgoetz commented on a diff in the
Github user ptgoetz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/429#issuecomment-74885134
+1 I was able to verify the fix, and am in favor of merging. I'd also like
to apply it to the 0.9.x branch as I feel it's an important fix.
---
If your project is set up
Github user ptgoetz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/429#discussion_r24909769
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/messaging/netty/Client.java ---
@@ -42,344 +42,577 @@
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
import backtyp
Github user Crystark commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/374#discussion_r24902452
--- Diff:
external/storm-jdbc/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/jdbc/common/JdbcClient.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwa
Github user Crystark commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/374#discussion_r24902378
--- Diff:
external/storm-jdbc/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/jdbc/common/JdbcClient.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14325873#comment-14325873
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-616:
--
Github user Crystark commented on the pull req
Github user Crystark commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/374#issuecomment-74867621
This would indeed be nice but after trying it out it seems that if a batch
has more than one tuple to insert, then only the last tuple is inserted.
In
[JdbcClien
Hi
The external/KafkaSpout uses low level Kafka API. I want to know if the
High level Kafka API is LESS suited to implement a KafkaSpout. Is spout a
valid use case to use Kafka SimpleConsumer (low level API)?
Thanks
Chandan
Hi All,
I have set and exported SSL_OPTS but it is not being picked up while
running storm. I need to use client certificate with the http client
connections originated from a bolt. I have set the options on the storm
command as well, but still the same issue.
thanks
Clay
57 matches
Mail list logo
