[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381626#comment-14381626
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-723:
I reviewed RedisStateUpdater and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381579#comment-14381579
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-723:
Great! It makes better clarification.
Btw, maybe
Github user longdafeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/468#discussion_r27273285
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/utils/Utils.java ---
@@ -533,4 +533,16 @@ private static SerializationDelegate
getSerializationDelegate(Map
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14383262#comment-14383262
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-712:
--
Github user longdafeng commented on a diff in
Github user lazyval commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/468#discussion_r27231134
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/drpc/DRPCSpout.java ---
@@ -129,7 +133,9 @@ private void checkFutures() {
public void open(Map conf,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14382183#comment-14382183
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-712:
--
Github user lazyval commented on a diff in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14382189#comment-14382189
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-712:
--
Github user lazyval commented on a diff in the
The Apache Storm community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Storm
version 0.9.4.
Storm is a distributed, fault-tolerant, and high-performance realtime
computation system that provides strong guarantees on the processing of data.
You can read more about Storm on the project website:
Github user lazyval commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/468#discussion_r27230992
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/utils/Utils.java ---
@@ -533,4 +533,16 @@ private static SerializationDelegate
getSerializationDelegate(Map
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/482#issuecomment-86521810
I am +1 on the change, but my only question is do we want to do this only
for all branches? or only for 0.10.X?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381902#comment-14381902
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-723:
--
Github user revans2 commented on the pull
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/482#issuecomment-86526814
I think we should remove these 2 files from all branches, since we'll
introduce new classes if we need.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381907#comment-14381907
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-723:
--
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/475#issuecomment-86529303
-1, I know it is convoluted the path through the code for this, but ID is
already the topology name. I don't see a reason to break backwards
compatibility to have the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14382738#comment-14382738
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-728:
--
GitHub user d2r opened a pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14382740#comment-14382740
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-714:
--
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14382745#comment-14382745
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-727:
--
Github user d2r commented on the pull request:
Derek Dagit created STORM-729:
-
Summary: UI: Component Page Executors header is missing the
selected window
Key: STORM-729
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-729
Project: Apache Storm
GitHub user d2r opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/485
[STORM-729] Include Executors (Window Hint) if the component is of Bolt type
This was missing only from the Bolt case.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14382785#comment-14382785
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-729:
--
GitHub user d2r opened a pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14382790#comment-14382790
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-704:
--
GitHub user HeartSaVioR opened a pull request:
Derek Dagit created STORM-730:
-
Summary: UI: Component Page has extra } for executor ids of Bolts
Key: STORM-730
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-730
Project: Apache Storm
Issue
GitHub user d2r opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/487
[STORM-730] remove extra curly brace
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/d2r/storm storm-730-extra-brace
Alternatively you can review
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14382797#comment-14382797
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-730:
--
GitHub user d2r opened a pull request:
Github user d2r commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/483#issuecomment-86729962
It would be even better to use an ephemeral port, as with
util/available-port.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
GitHub user HeartSaVioR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/486
STORM-704 Apply Travis CI to Apache Storm Project
* support build matrix (openjdk6, openjdk7, oraclejdk7, oraclejdk8)
* change log level to WARN while running unit tests
* print out
Parth Brahmbhatt created STORM-727:
--
Summary: Storm tests should succeed even if a storm process is
running locally.
Key: STORM-727
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-727
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14382689#comment-14382689
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-727:
--
GitHub user Parth-Brahmbhatt opened a pull
Derek Dagit created STORM-728:
-
Summary: UI: Component Page Spout stats table has Emitted and
Transferred in each other's column
Key: STORM-728
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-728
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14382704#comment-14382704
]
Derek Dagit commented on STORM-728:
---
Pull request coming after some quick testing.
UI:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14382398#comment-14382398
]
Parth Brahmbhatt commented on STORM-726:
Cant really post PR against nimbus-ha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14382825#comment-14382825
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-704:
--
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14382830#comment-14382830
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-704:
--
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/488#issuecomment-86746560
@dashengju @revans2 Please take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user HeartSaVioR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/488
[storm-redis] Clarify Redis*StateUpdater's expire is optional
It's not released to official, and I've just changed constructor signature
so I'm not sure it can be treated to small patch.
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/486#issuecomment-86739674
Applied first on my forked repo:
https://travis-ci.org/HeartSaVioR/storm/jobs/56021892
Could any committers help requesting set up Travis CI to Apache Infra?
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/486#issuecomment-86740796
Failing build (from storm-core) output for example :
https://s3.amazonaws.com/archive.travis-ci.org/jobs/56016756/log.txt
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user dashengju commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/488#issuecomment-86784079
nice, +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Hi, everyone.
I'm a researcher in the distributed system field. Now i'm going to find the
bottlenecks of Storm and Spark Streaming. I'd like to know the popular
benchmarks to test the thoughout and latency of Storm or Spark Streaming.
If someone has experiences or professional knowledge, i'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381932#comment-14381932
]
DashengJu commented on STORM-723:
-
I'm ok with withExpire() method.
[storm-redis]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381933#comment-14381933
]
DashengJu commented on STORM-723:
-
I'm ok with withExpire() method.
[storm-redis]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381930#comment-14381930
]
DashengJu commented on STORM-723:
-
I'm ok with withExpire() method.
[storm-redis]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381929#comment-14381929
]
DashengJu commented on STORM-723:
-
I'm ok with withExpire() method.
[storm-redis]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381927#comment-14381927
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-587:
--
Github user revans2 commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381931#comment-14381931
]
DashengJu commented on STORM-723:
-
I'm ok with withExpire() method.
[storm-redis]
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/482#issuecomment-86542171
@HeartSaVioR yes, but this is a very easy cherry-pick, when we are
depleting code. I am running the tests on 0.10.x-branch now to be sure
everything looks good, and then
Github user dashengju commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/481#issuecomment-86542208
@revans2 I think we should merge this PR to all branches. please help to
review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
DashengJu updated STORM-723:
Comment: was deleted
(was: I'm ok with withExpire() method.)
[storm-redis] RedisStateSetUpdater writes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
DashengJu updated STORM-723:
Comment: was deleted
(was: I'm ok with withExpire() method.)
[storm-redis] RedisStateSetUpdater writes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381969#comment-14381969
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-724:
--
Github user dashengju commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381926#comment-14381926
]
DashengJu commented on STORM-723:
-
I'm ok with withExpire() method.
[storm-redis]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381925#comment-14381925
]
DashengJu commented on STORM-723:
-
I'm ok with withExpire() method.
[storm-redis]
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/475#issuecomment-86536961
Sorry I am wrong, I need to look at it more. It is convoluted the path
through the code, which is why I need to look into this more. Right now it
appears to be the
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/475#issuecomment-86539624
This is the path I saw through the code. Please let me know if I missed
anything.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381957#comment-14381957
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-723:
--
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull
In all likelihood both code bases would coexist for a while until the features
added to Storm can be ported over to JStorm, and any discrepancies between the
two can be worked out.
- Bobby
On Thursday, March 26, 2015 9:27 AM, Supun Kamburugamuva
supu...@gmail.com wrote:
Having
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381940#comment-14381940
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-587:
--
Github user revans2 commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Joseph Evans resolved STORM-723.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.11.0
0.10.0
[~kabhwan],
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381914#comment-14381914
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-587:
--
Github user revans2 commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
DashengJu updated STORM-723:
Comment: was deleted
(was: I'm ok with withExpire() method.)
[storm-redis] RedisStateSetUpdater writes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
DashengJu updated STORM-723:
Comment: was deleted
(was: I'm ok with withExpire() method.)
[storm-redis] RedisStateSetUpdater writes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
DashengJu updated STORM-723:
Comment: was deleted
(was: I'm ok with withExpire() method.)
[storm-redis] RedisStateSetUpdater writes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
DashengJu updated STORM-723:
Comment: was deleted
(was: I'm ok with withExpire() method.)
[storm-redis] RedisStateSetUpdater writes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381948#comment-14381948
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-723:
--
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/482
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/482#issuecomment-86541464
@revans2 Thanks for merging! Especially I know that cherry-picking commits
is not a easy way to do. ;)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381942#comment-14381942
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-723:
--
Github user revans2 commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14381941#comment-14381941
]
DashengJu commented on STORM-723:
-
good idea
[storm-redis] RedisStateSetUpdater writes
68 matches
Mail list logo
