GitHub user HeartSaVioR opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/809
fix keyword (schema -> scheme) from main-routes
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/HeartSaVioR/storm STORM-1120
Alternatively
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14967379#comment-14967379
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1057:
---
Github user wangli1426 commented on the pull request:
Github user wangli1426 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/753#issuecomment-149948793
Hi @revans2 ,
Recent commits to the master branch cause conflict to my PR, so I up-merged
my PR in 4de33d1. Could you please review the code again? Thank you very
Hi,
currently, there are two tags (apache-storm and storm) used on SO. I
just suggested "apache-storm" to be the main tag and "storm" to be a
synonym for it. This enables that all questions get tagged with a unique
tag. Old and new questions get re-tag from storm to apache-storm
automatically if
Kishor Patil created STORM-1121:
---
Summary: Improve Nimbus Topology submission time
Key: STORM-1121
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1121
Project: Apache Storm
Issue Type: Bug
Github user jerrypeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/808#issuecomment-149974237
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/765#issuecomment-149987537
So I have been running a number of tests trying to come to a conclusive
decision on how storm should handle batching, and trying to understand the
difference between my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14967654#comment-14967654
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1121:
---
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14967622#comment-14967622
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-855:
--
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
GitHub user kishorvpatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/810
[STORM-1121] Remove method call to avoid overhead during topology
submission time
Nimbus calls mk-assignments from SubmitTopology within lock is causing it
to wait for processing of all
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/810#discussion_r42666392
--- Diff: storm-core/test/clj/backtype/storm/integration_test.clj ---
@@ -236,6 +237,7 @@
"acking-test1"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14967689#comment-14967689
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1121:
---
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14967714#comment-14967714
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-:
---
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/807#discussion_r42669817
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/Config.java ---
@@ -1215,6 +1254,7 @@
* to be equal to the number of workers configured for this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14967757#comment-14967757
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1057:
---
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/810#issuecomment-149996906
I love the concept, but I would like to see the tests updated so we are not
adding several mins to the time it takes to run the unit tests.
---
If your project is set
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/807#discussion_r42669491
--- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/backtype/storm/Config.java ---
@@ -247,6 +253,7 @@
*
* Defaults to false.
*/
+@Deprecated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14967711#comment-14967711
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-:
---
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14967715#comment-14967715
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-:
---
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/807#issuecomment-150001051
Just two minor nits and then I am +1 on this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/802
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14967732#comment-14967732
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1115:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Joseph Evans updated STORM-1115:
---
Assignee: Daniel Schonfeld
> Stale leader-lock key effectively bans all nodes from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14967756#comment-14967756
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1057:
---
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/753#issuecomment-150007774
I just have two minor questions now. After that I am +1, but I would like
to hear from @d2r. He wrote a lot of the recent metrics code changes and I
value his opinion
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Joseph Evans resolved STORM-1115.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.11.0
Thanks [~danielschonfeld],
I merged
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14967738#comment-14967738
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1057:
---
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/753#discussion_r42671953
--- Diff: STORM-UI-REST-API.md ---
@@ -351,11 +354,13 @@ Sample response:
"executors": 12,
"emitted": 184580,
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/753#discussion_r42673357
--- Diff: storm-core/src/clj/backtype/storm/stats.clj ---
@@ -277,15 +277,34 @@
(value-stats stats SPOUT-FIELDS)
{:type :spout}))
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14968137#comment-14968137
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1121:
---
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/810#issuecomment-150049582
@HeartSaVioR looking into compilation issue. Somehow it did not get
committed. Re-running the build.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Priyank Shah resolved STORM-1017.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> If ignoreZkOffsets set true,KafkaSpout will reset zk offset when recover from
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/810#issuecomment-150051486
@kishorvpatil
rebalance seems not work cause it requires topology to be alive at the
moment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14968155#comment-14968155
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1121:
---
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim updated STORM-1017:
Fix Version/s: 0.11.0
> If ignoreZkOffsets set true,KafkaSpout will reset zk offset when recover
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14968106#comment-14968106
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1121:
---
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request:
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/810#issuecomment-150045478
@kishorvpatil
You may want to check Travis build failure, seems like there's a missing
spot.
> Exception in thread "main"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14968116#comment-14968116
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1121:
---
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request:
Github user wangli1426 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/753#discussion_r42704498
--- Diff: storm-core/src/clj/backtype/storm/stats.clj ---
@@ -277,15 +277,34 @@
(value-stats stats SPOUT-FIELDS)
{:type
Github user wangli1426 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/753#discussion_r42704561
--- Diff: STORM-UI-REST-API.md ---
@@ -351,11 +354,13 @@ Sample response:
"executors": 12,
"emitted": 184580,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14968353#comment-14968353
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1057:
---
Github user wangli1426 commented on a diff in the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14968354#comment-14968354
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1057:
---
Github user wangli1426 commented on a diff in the pull
Github user wangli1426 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/753#issuecomment-150076986
Hi @revans2 ,
Thanks for very much for your time and efforts. Following your suggestions,
I have made ```update-values``` as a regular function and fixed the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14968355#comment-14968355
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1057:
---
Github user wangli1426 commented on the pull request:
Github user wangli1426 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/753#issuecomment-150077548
Hi @d2r,
Could you please review this PR? Your response is highly appreciated.
Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14968358#comment-14968358
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1057:
---
Github user wangli1426 commented on the pull request:
Nice work Matthias! Upvoted.
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
2015-10-22 1:16 GMT+09:00 Matthias J. Sax :
> Hi,
>
> currently, there are two tags (apache-storm and storm) used on SO. I
> just suggested "apache-storm" to be the main tag and "storm" to be a
> synonym for it. This
Jungtaek Lim created STORM-1120:
---
Summary: main-routes in backtype.storm.ui.core uses wrong keyword
- schema
Key: STORM-1120
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1120
Project: Apache Storm
48 matches
Mail list logo