Github user BuDongDong commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/433#issuecomment-76966697
@d2r I haved imported backtype.storm.generated.StormTopology in task.clj.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user BuDongDong commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/312#issuecomment-76868454
@d2r ok, i have closed this pull request.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user BuDongDong commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/433#issuecomment-76870913
@d2r I have added [STORM-554] to the title of this pull request and closed
#312.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user BuDongDong commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/312#issuecomment-76647927
@d2r I create a new repository, and pull this request again. see #433.
I have filed a JIRA, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-554.
you can merge #433
Github user BuDongDong commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/312#issuecomment-74463198
@revans2 I create a new repository, and pull this request again. see
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/433.
I have filed a JIRA, https://issues.apache.org/jira
Github user BuDongDong commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/288#issuecomment-74460727
@revans2 ok, i will close this pull request.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user BuDongDong closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/288
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user BuDongDong opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/433
Update get-task-object function, change the type of first param
topology from ^TopologyContext to ^StormTopology
Update get-task-object function, change the type of first param
topology from
Github user BuDongDong commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/288#issuecomment-69576596
@revans2 I have filed a JIRA(STORM-527) for this, please see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-527
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user BuDongDong commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/288#issuecomment-69574937
@revans2 thank you
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user BuDongDong opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/348
Update stats.clj rolling-window-set function, exchange the real argume...
...nt num-buckets and s of rolling-window function
(defn rolling-window-set [updater merger extractor num-buckets
Github user BuDongDong commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/348#issuecomment-66964691
(defrecord RollingWindow [updater merger extractor bucket-size-secs
num-buckets buckets])
I think that the bucket-size-secs of RollingWindow is 20
Github user BuDongDong commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/348#issuecomment-67004693
@nathanmarz Could you check this bug, thank you very much
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user BuDongDong closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/348
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user BuDongDong commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/312#issuecomment-63206771
@harshach the get-task-object is called by mk-task-data function in
task.clj, mk-task-data is defined as following:
(defn mk-task-data [executor-data task-id
Github user BuDongDong commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/312#issuecomment-62844422
(defn- get-task-object [^TopologyContext topology component-id] ... ... )
i think the type of param topology is StormTopology not TopologyContext
GitHub user BuDongDong opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/312
Update get-task-object function, change the type of first param
topology from ^TopologyContext to ^StormTopology
update get-task-object function, change the type of first param
topology from
GitHub user BuDongDong opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/288
update worker.clj-delete missing-tasks checking
missing-tasks set is created by two times filter my-assignment map, so i
think keys(my-assignment) contains missing-tasks set.
missing-tasks
18 matches
Mail list logo
