Re: Messaging protocol with Stratos python cartridge agent

2014-09-04 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
Hi, Thank you very much Paul! I completely agree with you and +1 for the refactoring of the topic hierarchy. Regarding the reliable delivery in MQTT, I just checked v3.1 specification [1] and it has three levels of QoS: *Three qualities of service for message delivery:* *- "At most once", where

Re: Assign private IP addresses when subscribing to cartridge via CC

2014-09-04 Thread Jeffrey Nguyen (jeffrngu)
Thanks Udara! This is an old email I sent. I've already made the enhancement to support fixed private Ips a while back. The changes already pushed upstream. -Jeffrey From: Udara Liyanage mailto:ud...@wso2.com>> Reply-To: "dev@stratos.apache.org" mailto:dev@str

Re: Specifying the network in cartridge definition

2014-09-04 Thread Jeffrey Nguyen (jeffrngu)
Hi Chris, Udara, While you're at it, please also add "fixedIp" and "portUuid" as well as per https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STRATOS/4.0.0+Sample+Cartridge+ Definition. I don't believe "name" attributed is currently supported (at least in to 4.0.0) although I think it's nice to have.

Re: Messaging protocol with Stratos python cartridge agent

2014-09-04 Thread Paul Fremantle
Folks I am not suggesting we move to MQTT necessarily. However, if we want a simple protocol with easy native python support, its not bad. STOMP is also good. It is pretty limiting that MQTT doesn't support headers. My only comment was that we are not actually using headers properly here. The ref

[GitHub] stratos pull request: Updated pom with correct group id and versio...

2014-09-04 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/stratos/pull/23 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab

Re: Messaging protocol with Stratos python cartridge agent

2014-09-04 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
> > Based on the above discussion, I guess we need to change the the existing > Stratos messaging model to support the Pub/Sub model and MQTT protocol. > I think this statement is not correct, currently we use Pub/Sub model in Stratos messaging system. AFAIU we are looking at two concerns in this

[jira] [Created] (STRATOS-773) Update method for domain mapping

2014-09-04 Thread Samith Dassanayake (JIRA)
Samith Dassanayake created STRATOS-773: -- Summary: Update method for domain mapping Key: STRATOS-773 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-773 Project: Stratos Issue Type: Im

Re: Supporting dynamically build / publish docker images in cartridge deployment

2014-09-04 Thread chris snow
Hi Sajith, At the moment the Stratos in docker images have to be built manually (with a single command). I haven't put much effort into automation because of questions around licensing as all docker images are based on Linux and will probably inherit the GPL license. Many thanks, Chris On Thu,

Supporting dynamically build / publish docker images in cartridge deployment

2014-09-04 Thread Sajith Kariyawasam
Hi Devs, As mentioned in Lakmal's previous mail "Stratos and Kuburnetes and docker support", its better if we can support dynamically build and push Docker images to the registry during a cartridge deployment. I think its a great feature to have, and can be supported by using CI tools like Jenkin