DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31348] - Using a tiles definition as errorPage causes infinite looping

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: rev 55583 - struts/trunk/doc

Author: husted Date: Mon Oct 25 23:48:53 2004 New Revision: 55583 Modified: struts/trunk/doc/volunteers.xml Log: Substitute (tm) for ™ since the entity choked my build :) Modified: struts/trunk/doc/volunteers.xml == --

svn commit: rev 55581 - struts/trunk/web/blank/WEB-INF/src/java/resources

Author: husted Date: Mon Oct 25 23:43:31 2004 New Revision: 55581 Removed: struts/trunk/web/blank/WEB-INF/src/java/resources/ Log: Removed file/folder per Bugzilla #31399 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additio

svn commit: rev 55580 - struts/trunk/web/blank/WEB-INF/src/java/resources

Author: husted Date: Mon Oct 25 23:43:12 2004 New Revision: 55580 Removed: struts/trunk/web/blank/WEB-INF/src/java/resources/application.properties Log: Removed file/folder per Bugzilla #31399 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

svn commit: rev 55579 - struts/trunk/web/blank/WEB-INF/classes/resources

Author: husted Date: Mon Oct 25 23:42:43 2004 New Revision: 55579 Removed: struts/trunk/web/blank/WEB-INF/classes/resources/ Log: Removed file/folder per Bugzilla #31399 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addition

svn commit: rev 55578 - struts/trunk/web/blank/WEB-INF/classes/resources

Author: husted Date: Mon Oct 25 23:42:18 2004 New Revision: 55578 Removed: struts/trunk/web/blank/WEB-INF/classes/resources/MessageResources.properties Log: Removed file/folder per Bugzilla #31399 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM

svn commit: rev 55577 - in struts/trunk/web/blank/WEB-INF: classes src/java

Author: husted Date: Mon Oct 25 23:41:15 2004 New Revision: 55577 Added: struts/trunk/web/blank/WEB-INF/src/java/MessageResources.properties - copied unchanged from rev 55576, struts/trunk/web/blank/WEB-INF/classes/MessageResources.properties Removed: struts/trunk/web/blank/WEB-INF/cl

svn commit: rev 55576 - struts/trunk/src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles

Author: husted Date: Mon Oct 25 23:31:13 2004 New Revision: 55576 Modified: struts/trunk/src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles/ComponentContext.java Log: Apply #31348 "Using a tiles definition as errorPage causes infinite looping" submitted by Matt Meyer. Modified: struts/trunk/src/share/org/apac

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: EddieBush

Date: 2004-10-25T23:27:26 Editor: EddieBush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: EddieBush URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/EddieBush no comment Change Log: -- @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ ##languag

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: EddieBush

Date: 2004-10-25T23:26:53 Editor: EddieBush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: EddieBush URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/EddieBush no comment Change Log: -- @@ -18,5 +18,21 @@ *

Re: [VOTE] HTTPD or Tomcat (once more with feeling) [was Adopt ...]

Oh, sure, ask the tough questions after my bed-time! ;-) I haven't had the opportunity to pour over "our stuff" as thoroughly as I would like - and need to, in order to be accurate and concise. It's late and I've absolutely got to get some rest. I start an Essbase class tomorrow. I'm less tha

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31230] - Multiple classes using deprecated DefinitionsUtil class

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18169] - Resource attribute of msg tag in the validation.xml doesn't work as anticipated

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] HTTPD or Tomcat (once more with feeling) [was Adopt ...]

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:21:29 -0500, Eddie Bush wrote: > +1 for Tomcat style release. That's fine with me, Eddie. Do you have a link to the Tomcat release guidelines that we can incorporate by reference? Or, what specific changes do we need to make to our Release Plan Checklist, Release Guideli

Re: [VOTE] HTTPD or Tomcat (once more with feeling) [was Adopt ...]

On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:08:49 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: > I'm sorry, but I don't believe your changes reflect the discussions > here at all. We did not discuss removing the development build > availability from the 'aquiring' page, I'm vetoing that product change on the basis that we did not vote

Re: When is a release ready for primetime (was [VOTE] HTTPD ...)

Martin, I love ya man :-) I can say that. I'm secure in my masculinity and you and I have shared private banter. Ok, maybe it's been a while since we shared private banter - but we did it! :-P I think Ted's point is that a person shouldn't vote to go ahead with a release unless they've been

Re: [VOTE] HTTPD or Tomcat (once more with feeling) [was Adopt ...]

Hello Fellow Committers, Ok ... I've at least lessened my ignorance on the two policies by pouring over each of them. Here are my take-aways: HTTP - More emphasis put on RM. RM is the end-all be-all decider. - Builds are (hopefully) tested and then promoted to alpha - During this p

[OT] Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: EddieBush

Most excellent. You gone Southern Buddhist on us, Eddie? Thanks for the upbeat perspective. Too little of that and too much navel gazing these days. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: 2004-10-25T19:28:29 Editor: EddieBush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: EddieBush URL

Re: When is a release ready for primetime (was [VOTE] HTTPD ...)

On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:30:20 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:05:10 -0500, Joe Germuska wrote: > > > > What I do think we've been doing wrong is rushing to vote on a > > release right after it is cut. As I noted before, from the > > framework we've laid out, I

Struts Shale

> 3.1 Java2 Standard Edition APIs I'd be +1 for J2SE 5.0 * http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/index.jsp Since Struts 1.x is in evolutionary mode, we might as well start the revolution based on the latest and greatest. We'd then be able to "take advantage of annotations, generics, and all that". F

Re: When is a release ready for primetime (was [VOTE] HTTPD ...)

On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:51:26 -0500, Eddie Bush wrote: > As much as I agree with your sentiment (about us eating what we > cook), it's decidedly easier for some of us to actually stay > bleeding edge than others. > > Whatever I do at home may be bleeding edge, but once I step in the > office ... wel

Re: [VOTE] HTTPD or Tomcat (once more with feeling) [was Adopt ...]

On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 06:47:34 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't agree that it makes any practical difference whether we use Tomcat or HTTPD. > Most people won't even notice the difference. (I didn't at first.) I'd still prefer > going with HTTPD "out of the box" for the sake o

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31501] - html:form focus generates non-XHTML

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: EddieBush

Date: 2004-10-25T19:28:29 Editor: EddieBush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: EddieBush URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/EddieBush no comment Change Log: -- @@ -1,12 +1,20 @@ ##langu

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: ActionChaining

Date: 2004-10-25T19:08:38 Editor: JoeGermuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: ActionChaining URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ActionChaining Remove long and old emai; attempt to summarize some recent list discussion. Change Log:

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: ForwardingWithDifferentParameter

Date: 2004-10-25T18:48:09 Editor: JoeGermuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: ForwardingWithDifferentParameter URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ForwardingWithDifferentParameter Add link to ActionChaining page. Change Log: ---

Re: When is a release ready for primetime (was [VOTE] HTTPD ...)

As much as I agree with your sentiment (about us eating what we cook), it's decidedly easier for some of us to actually stay bleeding edge than others. Whatever I do at home may be bleeding edge, but once I step in the office ... well, I haven't pushed very hard for bleeding edge, but I'd like t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31842] - [struts-faces] Simple JSF integration with Tiles

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31842] - [struts-faces] Simple JSF integration with Tiles

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31842] - [struts-faces] Simple JSF integration with Tiles

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: When is a release ready for primetime (was [VOTE] HTTPD ...)

On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:05:10 -0500, Joe Germuska wrote: > > What I do think we've been doing wrong is rushing to vote on a > release right after it is cut.  As I noted before, from the > framework we've laid out, I would consider it totally normal for us > to change (upward) the status of a release

Re: [VOTE] HTTPD or Tomcat (once more with feeling) [was Adopt ...]

On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:16:42 -0400, James Mitchell wrote: >  I just want us to decide and move on. Since no one was voting, I assumed that it "died in commitee", and we did move on. Ted Husted wrote: > My own feelings aside, I updated the website to coincide with what > we discussed here. and > 

Re: [VOTE] HTTPD or Tomcat (once more with feeling) [was Adopt ...]

At 8:16 AM -0400 10/25/04, James Mitchell wrote: Guys, this discussion/debate is quite discouraging. I don't know how the other committers feel, but I have no strong opinion for either. I just want us to decide and move on. One thing I would like to understand. Why haven't other committers broug

Re: XHTML Form Tag

--- Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If I sound a little irked about this, it's because I am ... it turns > out that the generted JavaScript function names for Commons Validator > 1.1.3 (included with Struts 1.2.x) are different than the generated > names in the version of Valida

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: ActionChaining

Date: 2004-10-25T05:59:12 Editor: JoeGermuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: ActionChaining URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ActionChaining remove nested 'code' format triple braces from email to improve formatting Change Log: -

Re: [VOTE] HTTPD or Tomcat (once more with feeling) [was Adopt ...]

Guys, this discussion/debate is quite discouraging. I don't know how the other committers feel, but I have no strong opinion for either. I just want us to decide and move on. One thing I would like to understand. Why haven't other committers brought their opinions forward on this? Is it: a) th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31874] New: - add "isFuture" validator for credit card expiration dates

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu