DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31501] - html:form focus generates non-XHTML

2004-10-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: JSF and highly dynamic apps (was Re: Struts-BSF, Struts-Scripting [was Re: Proposal: Javascript-to-Java object conversions]]])

2004-10-31 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 21:30:22 -0600, Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Unless Martin is incorrect about the way JSF handles requests, I'm inclined > to believe (despite the fact JSF will be a part of the next specification) > we might want to consider using something else under the covers i

Re: JSF and highly dynamic apps (was Re: Struts-BSF, Struts-Scripting [was Re: Proposal: Javascript-to-Java object conversions]]])

2004-10-31 Thread Eddie Bush
I haven't found much need to utilize scriplets since the JSTL came along. Indeed, I feel pages are much cleaner and a great deal more legible if taglibs are used. I rarely, if ever, use anything except the JSTL though. One notable exception is Struts' own taglibs. I make other exceptions from

Re: JSF and highly dynamic apps (was Re: Struts-BSF, Struts-Scripting [was Re: Proposal: Javascript-to-Java object conversions]]])

2004-10-31 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
Martin, you make an interesting comment that I think ties into this discussion (loosely ;) ) that is worth mentioning... A lot of the tools us architects and developers use these days really only make sense in cases where you have a separation of activities in terms of page authors and develope

JSF and highly dynamic apps (was Re: Struts-BSF, Struts-Scripting [was Re: Proposal: Javascript-to-Java object conversions]]])

2004-10-31 Thread Martin Cooper
I hear what you're saying, Craig. However, I still feel that JSF doesn't buy me much when building highly dynamic apps. Some points to consider: * Since one of the goals of such apps is to minimise the number of full page refreshes, relatively little of the app can be constructed using tools such

Re: Fw: Mail Delivery Failure

2004-10-31 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 15:59:20 -0600, Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey, could we oust this person? :-) I know Martin said a while back he > thought he had done that. It appears the "fix" has yet to take. That change actually did work - the address was removed from the dev list. It turns

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31501] - html:form focus generates non-XHTML

2004-10-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Fw: Mail Delivery Failure

2004-10-31 Thread Eddie Bush
Hey, could we oust this person? :-) I know Martin said a while back he thought he had done that. It appears the "fix" has yet to take. I actually tried to contact the postmaster, but never heard anything back, the last time around. Eddie - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Proposal: Javascript-to-Java object conversions

2004-10-31 Thread Eddie Bush
That would be interesting. I've got a bit o' the Irish in meh (Me father's side) and ave always wanted to see Ireland first-hand. Next year, I might actually be in a position to travel for it. Eddie - Original Message - From: "robert burrell donkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Dev

svn commit: rev 56146 - struts/trunk/doc/stylesheets

2004-10-31 Thread martinc
Author: martinc Date: Sun Oct 31 10:37:11 2004 New Revision: 56146 Modified: struts/trunk/doc/stylesheets/struts.xsl Log: Add ApacheCon 2004 logo, as requested by ConCom. Modified: struts/trunk/doc/stylesheets/struts.xsl =

Re: Proposal: Javascript-to-Java object conversions

2004-10-31 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 29 Oct 2004, at 22:46, Ted Husted wrote: On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:01:36 -0700, Don Brown wrote:  Struts Flow will be added to Struts soon as an official sub-  project, as will Struts BSF I was getting ready to mention that the Guiness clock is ticking, in case you still wanted to have these in pl

Re: Synergy between BSF & Validation [was:Re: Struts-BSF, Struts-Scripting]

2004-10-31 Thread David Graham
--- Rob Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A while back I suggested using Rhino to consolidate all validations so > server side & client side > validations were the same core code written in JS. It this more viable > now ? Maintaining 2 sets of > validations in java & javascript items tend to

Bug report for Struts [2004/10/31]

2004-10-31 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: EddieBush

2004-10-31 Thread dev
Date: 2004-10-31T00:10:00 Editor: EddieBush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: EddieBush URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/EddieBush no comment Change Log: -- @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ * [ht