Re: Struts Sub-Projects

One of the initial reasons for having one trunk / branches / tags group, rather than several, was the desire to be able to refactor across artifacts. If that is still retained with the proposal below, then I'm fine with it. Otherwise, I think we need to consider it a bit more. -- Martin Cooper O

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31960] - checkboxes not being set from ON to OFF --> solution

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Bug report for Struts [2004/11/07]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: Struts Sub-Projects

On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 15:19:02 -0800, Craig McClanahan wrote: > Agree that it's easy to move things around ... but I've got a > question -- does this still all end up under our single canonical > SVN URL (https://svn.apache.org/asf/struts)? Yes. If a developer wants the whole enchilada, they can sta