Re: Struts + Chain enhancement idea

2004-12-14 Thread Dakota Jack
Hi, Martin, I don't think I said a thing about struts-chain. Why would you think I thought something I never mentioned and ignore what I did say? What you suggest I said is patently stupid. So, I have to admit I don't think that. No one would think that. That would be perfect straw man, if th

svn commit: r111950 - /struts/core/trunk/build-tests.xml /struts/core/trunk/build.properties.sample /struts/core/trunk/build.properties.sample.lib

2004-12-14 Thread martinc
Author: martinc Date: Tue Dec 14 21:47:37 2004 New Revision: 111950 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=111950 Log: Simplify the config for Cactus testing by removing the need for most of the explicit properties. Modified: struts/core/trunk/build-tests.xml struts/core/trunk/buil

Re: Struts + Chain enhancement idea

2004-12-14 Thread Martin Cooper
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Dakota Jack wrote: How is JSF not OT with struts-dev or struts-user? Struts is not dead yet, is it? And, if not, why is struts airtime free to JSF? You don't consider a question about STRUTS-chain - a component in the Struts sandbox - to be relevant to Struts? -- Martin Co

Re: Struts + Chain enhancement idea

2004-12-14 Thread Dakota Jack
How is JSF not OT with struts-dev or struts-user? Struts is not dead yet, is it? And, if not, why is struts airtime free to JSF? Jack On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:24:25 -0500, Deadman, Hal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > By the way, for the benefit of our developer community, i just read an > > artic

Re: Struts + Chain enhancement idea

2004-12-14 Thread BaTien Duong
Ted Husted wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:29:06 -0700, BaTien Duong wrote: This is a showcase of open sources :-) Are we talking about the next-generation of DB Group's PSI package? Is this a framework that you will be able to share with the community, or will the code remain in-house? -Ted

RE: Struts + Chain enhancement idea

2004-12-14 Thread Deadman, Hal
> By the way, for the benefit of our developer community, i just read an > article " Creating a Pet Store Application with JavaServer Faces, > Spring, and Hibernate" > http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=46977&DE=1 that demonstrates the > readiness of involved technologies. I like to add 2 things

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22486] - [PATCH] Give MessageResources a reference to MessageResourcesConfig

2004-12-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsReloadingConfig

2004-12-14 Thread dev
Date: 2004-12-14T09:48:45 Editor: HassanReyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsReloadingConfig URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsReloadingConfig no comment Change Log: --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32016] - tag renders incorrect HTML 4.01 strict when using token

2004-12-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22486] - [PATCH] Give MessageResources a reference to MessageResourcesConfig

2004-12-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32698] New: - Make ActionForm accessible via request attribute for *each* request

2004-12-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32697] - 1.2.6 source code distribution is missing the source code

2004-12-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32697] New: - 1.2.6 source code distribution is missing the source code

2004-12-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu