To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project struts-taglib has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project struts-taglib has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33996.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
My plan is to support configuration inheritance for form beans,
forwards, exception handlers, and actions. Should I finish them all
up, present them all, then check them in, or should I check in code as
they become ready?
At the moment, form beans are done. Exceptions, forwards, and actions
Date: 2005-03-15T09:22:20
Editor: RenaudTarnec
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsJobJar
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsJobJar
Changed the link to the tickets page: there was a typo as
order=%27Importance%27
Change Log:
Joe had mentioned wanting to move module init code to the
ModuleConfigFactory.
I did? ;-)
Seriously, though, I don't quite remember the details of that
discussion -- do you happen to have any pointers to the archives?
I think in general, the idea is to make ActionServlet do little more
than
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33996.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33996.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33996.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:23:09 -0600, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe had mentioned wanting to move module init code to the
ModuleConfigFactory.
I did? ;-)
Seriously, though, I don't quite remember the details of that
discussion -- do you happen to have any pointers to the
The only problem I am having with removing old files is that I don't put
everything in one folder. I have the nightlies tucked under a folder with
the date (yyy-mm-dd) as the name. I have struggled for the past week or so
trying to figure out a way to rm -fr the old directories based on the
At 1:16 PM -0600 3/15/05, Hubert Rabago wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:23:09 -0600, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe had mentioned wanting to move module init code to the
ModuleConfigFactory.
...
It wasn't really discussed, just mentioned. :) The point was to move
the code out of
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34027.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34027.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I wrote:
Yes... I'm sorry that that discussion has stalled. Although I don't
even know if that's an incremental step towards a POJO action --
it's practically all you need, plus a little more smarts in the
CreateAction command. I'll go post a ping.
OK, so I actually started looking at using
Author: germuska
Date: Tue Mar 15 18:57:04 2005
New Revision: 157634
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=157634
Log:
Introduce ActionCommand interface and ActionCommandBase class, and adapt all
relevant command implementations to extend ActionCommandBase.
Added:
Author: jmitchell
Date: Tue Mar 15 19:50:09 2005
New Revision: 157637
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=157637
Log:
remove useless nesting of JSPs
Added:
struts/taglib/trunk/src/webapp/org/
- copied from r157626, struts/taglib/trunk/src/webapp/test/test/org/
Removed:
Author: jmitchell
Date: Tue Mar 15 20:04:44 2005
New Revision: 157642
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=157642
Log:
fix taglib uri
Modified:
struts/taglib/trunk/src/webapp/org/apache/struts/taglib/logic/TestIterateTag.jsp
Modified:
Modified:
struts/taglib/trunk/src/webapp/org/apache/struts/taglib/html/TestRadioTag1.jsp
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/struts/taglib/trunk/src/webapp/org/apache/struts/taglib/html/TestRadioTag1.jsp?view=diffr1=157646r2=157647
Author: jmitchell
Date: Tue Mar 15 20:08:32 2005
New Revision: 157648
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=157648
Log:
fix taglib uri
Modified:
struts/taglib/trunk/src/webapp/org/apache/struts/taglib/bean/TestCookieTag.jsp
Author: jmitchell
Date: Tue Mar 15 20:12:47 2005
New Revision: 157649
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=157649
Log:
add README.txt for running cactus
Added:
struts/taglib/trunk/README.txt (with props)
Added: struts/taglib/trunk/README.txt
URL:
Author: jmitchell
Date: Tue Mar 15 20:16:10 2005
New Revision: 157652
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=157652
Log:
add project.properties for cactus stuff
Added:
struts/taglib/trunk/project.properties (with props)
Added: struts/taglib/trunk/project.properties
URL:
Author: jmitchell
Date: Tue Mar 15 20:17:09 2005
New Revision: 157653
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=157653
Log:
add necessary jars for cactus run
Modified:
struts/taglib/trunk/project.xml
Modified: struts/taglib/trunk/project.xml
URL:
Author: jmitchell
Date: Tue Mar 15 20:18:18 2005
New Revision: 157656
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=157656
Log:
fix cactus config (see README.txt to get cactus to run)
Modified:
struts/taglib/trunk/maven.xml
Modified: struts/taglib/trunk/maven.xml
URL:
The idea, I thought, was to use the Commands to supplant the
RequestProcessor with a composable request processor. Some of the
present suggestions are so radical as to provide some question whether
Struts is going to be Struts. This is especially so of the suggestion
that we tie the ActionForm
Author: jmitchell
Date: Tue Mar 15 20:25:46 2005
New Revision: 157663
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=157663
Log:
add cactus-web.xml
Added:
struts/taglib/trunk/src/conf/cactus-web.xml (with props)
Added: struts/taglib/trunk/src/conf/cactus-web.xml
URL:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:34:13 -0600, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote:
Yes... I'm sorry that that discussion has stalled. Although I don't
even know if that's an incremental step towards a POJO action --
it's practically all you need, plus a little more smarts in the
CreateAction
- Original Message -
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 4:48 AM
I'm not sure I see the reasoning / benefit of POJOs as Actions. The
implication is that some method that wasn't designed to be invoked as
a command / action can do something useful
SNIP
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 04:59:47 -, Niall Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 4:22 AM
The idea, I thought, was to use the Commands to supplant the
RequestProcessor with a composable
Author: jmitchell
Date: Tue Mar 15 22:01:15 2005
New Revision: 157697
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=157697
Log:
fix shared build so that nightlies are copied correctly
Modified:
struts/build/trunk/maven.xml
struts/build/trunk/project.xml
Modified:
Author: jmitchell
Date: Tue Mar 15 22:02:46 2005
New Revision: 157699
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=157699
Log:
add a hack for overriding the copy-distribution goal since the Maven reactor
won't allow multiple excludes (or I haven't figured out how ;)
Modified:
I've looked at 1.3 and the Chain stuff, but not actually tried it out.
However the original RequestProcessor is still there and presumably still
works. The default RequestProcessor is now the chain
ComposableRequestProcessor, so to use the original one would have to be
configured. No one (to my
Hi,
Is there any site that gives me the advantages and disadvantages of going
for Struts-EL taglibraries.
Regards
Rajaneesh
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author: jmitchell
Date: Tue Mar 15 22:32:29 2005
New Revision: 157706
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=157706
Log:
This is the current nightly build script that builds and uploads the Mavenized
nightlies
Added:
struts/build/trunk/maven-nightly.sh.current (with props)
Added:
Ok, I've modified the way I put together the (Mavenized) nightlies and
tested the remove after 7 days piece. Seems to be working fine, but I
won't know for sure for another week.
I've included the current copy of the shell script that I run
(maven-nightly.sh.current), for when this gets moved
Hi,
Would there be any problem in using struts for HTTPS web application?
Regards
Rajaneesh
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe Germuska wrote:
I wrote:
Yes... I'm sorry that that discussion has stalled. Although I don't
even know if that's an incremental step towards a POJO action -- it's
practically all you need, plus a little more smarts in the
CreateAction command. I'll go post a ping.
OK, so I actually
Struts-el allow you to get a preview of struts tags used on a servlet
2.4 container (that handle EL itself)
Using Struts-el will make the migration from servlet 2.3 to 2.4 easier
(just update taglib URI).
EL adds also power to tags and JSP can skip scriptlets. JSP code looks
more XML compliant
David,
No, I don't have anything JSF-specific. The extracted version is simply
decoupled from Struts. Otherwise, it's just vanilla Tiles, except that I
So you have no facility like a ViewHandler or something like that?
Have you looked at MyFaces' TilesViewHandler ?
-Matthias
39 matches
Mail list logo
