DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33426.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34291.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34291.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project struts-taglib-from-packages has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project struts-taglib-from-packages has an issue affecting its community
integration.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34297.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34269.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33045.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34304.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34305.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21760.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: jmitchell
Date: Tue Apr 5 08:40:08 2005
New Revision: 160185
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=160185
Log:
final (i hope ;) changes for 1.2.x nightlies
Modified:
struts/core/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/build.xml
Modified: struts/core/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/build.xml
Ok, I think I've got it right (finally ;)
The nightly process is kicked off at 4AM EST. There are 2 parts to the
build.
1st is the Maven build against the latest from current/ (head), 2nd is to
build the latest from the 1.2.x branch ( STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH) and includes the
artifacts from
On Apr 5, 2005 8:51 AM, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I think I've got it right (finally ;)
The nightly process is kicked off at 4AM EST. There are 2 parts to the
build.
1st is the Maven build against the latest from current/ (head), 2nd is to
build the latest from the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34313.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by NiallPemberton:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsDeprecatedActionErrors
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34314.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34313.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: jmitchell
Date: Tue Apr 5 16:39:28 2005
New Revision: 160241
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=160241
Log:
remove unused depenencies and clean up the others (xdoclet)
Modified:
struts/taglib/trunk/project.xml
Modified: struts/taglib/trunk/project.xml
URL:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33045.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
If I'm just going to copy over the English text, wouldn't it be better
to leave the _ja file alone, since the english text in the default
resource would get picked up anyway?
Hubert
On Apr 5, 2005 8:12 AM, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One trick I've done is to do what Martin
Yes, well, sort of. To truly ensure that the value returned really came
from the alternate bundle, I append the snippet described below. But then,
I'm tedious about that stuff.it's your dime so it's your call ;)
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting /
Author: jmitchell
Date: Tue Apr 5 18:45:30 2005
New Revision: 160248
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=160248
Log:
clean up imports
Modified:
struts/taglib/trunk/project.properties
struts/taglib/trunk/src/java/org/apache/struts/taglib/html/JavascriptValidatorTag.java
Author: hrabago
Date: Tue Apr 5 18:45:50 2005
New Revision: 160249
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=160249
Log:
Add license notice and SVN tags.
Modified:
struts/core/trunk/src/test/org/apache/struts/config/TestFormPropertyConfig.java
Actually, what I'm wondering about is the interpretation. Having a
_ja file present, to me, says we have JA counterparts for these
messages. If the actual entry is the same, isn't it better to have
that come from the default bundle?
This isn't a test resource, so I'm not sure appending something
On Apr 5, 2005 7:05 PM, Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, what I'm wondering about is the interpretation. Having a
_ja file present, to me, says we have JA counterparts for these
messages. If the actual entry is the same, isn't it better to have
that come from the default
stxx also includes different languages for its examples. How I solved
the new entry problem was to run the text through babelfish -
http://world.altavista.com/
Don
Martin Cooper wrote:
On Apr 5, 2005 7:05 PM, Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, what I'm wondering about is the
- Original Message -
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 4:05 AM
Anyway, that was just a suggestion. It would really be better to hear
from people who are interested in doing translations on how they would
prefer to track changes.
Maybe pinging the
Author: hrabago
Date: Tue Apr 5 21:02:29 2005
New Revision: 160251
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=160251
Log:
Add myself and David Geary.
Modified:
struts/build/trunk/project.xml
Modified: struts/build/trunk/project.xml
URL:
Author: niallp
Date: Tue Apr 5 22:55:41 2005
New Revision: 160255
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=160255
Log:
Bug 32778 HTML Link Tag does not work with JSTL Loop Tag
Modified:
struts/taglib/trunk/src/java/org/apache/struts/taglib/html/BaseHandlerTag.java
30 matches
Mail list logo
