svn commit: r165455 - in /struts/shale/trunk/core-library: ./ src/test/ src/test/org/ src/test/org/apache/ src/test/org/apache/shale/ src/test/org/apache/shale/dialog/ src/test/org/apache/shale/dialog/faces/

Author: craigmcc Date: Sat Apr 30 21:27:28 2005 New Revision: 165455 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165455&view=rev Log: Initial unit tests for the core library, focused on DialogNavigationHandler. Added: struts/shale/trunk/core-library/src/test/ struts/shale/trunk/core-library/sr

svn commit: r165454 - in /struts/shale/trunk/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/shale/test: base/AbstractJsfTestCase.java mock/MockApplication.java mock/MockApplicationFactory.java mock/MockNavigationHandler.java mock/MockServletContext.java mock/MockViewHandler.java

Author: craigmcc Date: Sat Apr 30 21:26:36 2005 New Revision: 165454 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165454&view=rev Log: Flesh out mock object behaviors needed to build unit tests for DialogNavigationHandler in the core library. Modified: struts/shale/trunk/test-framework/src/java/or

svn commit: r165427 - in /struts/core/trunk/doc/flow: CollectionExtensions.xml FileExtensions.xml InputStreamExtensions.xml JSFlow.xml JSLog.xml ListExtensions.xml Struts.xml extensions.xml index.xml project.xml system.xml

Author: mrdon Date: Sat Apr 30 15:34:45 2005 New Revision: 165427 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165427&view=rev Log: * Adding generated Struts Flow docs * Updating home page and adding new left menu Added: struts/core/trunk/doc/flow/CollectionExtensions.xml struts/core/trunk/do

svn commit: r165426 - in /struts/flow/trunk: build.xml project.xml

Author: mrdon Date: Sat Apr 30 15:33:14 2005 New Revision: 165426 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165426&view=rev Log: * Updating commons-collections * Changing version to 0.5 * Removing xdoclet as a dependency Modified: struts/flow/trunk/build.xml struts/flow/trunk/project.xml

svn commit: r165425 - in /struts/flow/trunk: ./ src/doc/ src/examples/WEB-INF/wizard/ src/java/ src/java/org/apache/struts/flow/ src/java/org/apache/struts/flow/core/ src/java/org/apache/struts/flow/sugar/

Author: mrdon Date: Sat Apr 30 15:24:56 2005 New Revision: 165425 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165425&view=rev Log: * Adding custom javadoc scripts to pull javadoc comments out of javascript files, Rhino Scriptable Java files, Java API extension files, and POJO Java files, destine

[Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsShale" by CraigMcClanahan

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by CraigMcClanahan: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsShale -- The fo

svn commit: r165423 - /struts/shale/trunk/use-cases/src/web/WEB-INF/dialog-config.xml

Author: craigmcc Date: Sat Apr 30 14:46:37 2005 New Revision: 165423 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165423&view=rev Log: Leverage new ability to have global transition definitions in a dialog. Modified: struts/shale/trunk/use-cases/src/web/WEB-INF/dialog-config.xml Modified: struts/s

svn commit: r165422 [2/2] - in /struts/shale/trunk/core-library/src: conf/ java/org/apache/shale/dialog/ java/org/apache/shale/dialog/config/ java/org/apache/shale/dialog/faces/ java/org/apache/shale/dialog/impl/ java/org/apache/shale/faces/

Added: struts/shale/trunk/core-library/src/java/org/apache/shale/dialog/impl/ActionStateImpl.java URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/struts/shale/trunk/core-library/src/java/org/apache/shale/dialog/impl/ActionStateImpl.java?rev=165422&view=auto

Re: Preferred way to use Tiles with Struts 1.3 (Re: [Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsUpgradeNotes12to13" by NiallPemberton)

Perhaps I'm missing something, but I don't think moving initialisation into the *request processor* is tidy at all. Initialisation should happen before any requests come in. Well, it would, in the sense that RequestProcessor has a "init" method. We're not talking about totally lazy initialization

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34691] - for Config classes, DTD 1.3

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34691] - for Config classes, DTD 1.3

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Preferred way to use Tiles with Struts 1.3 (Re: [Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsUpgradeNotes12to13" by NiallPemberton)

On 4/27/05, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 5:46 PM +0100 4/27/05, Niall Pemberton wrote: > >Sounds good to me. > > > >I've realized the wiki is incorrect - since if you don't specify a > >"chainConfig" parameter then it uses the default one shipped. Maybe we can > >make it all automat

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34691] New: - for Config classes, DTD 1.3

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: JDK Version for 1.3.x

On 4/27/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't find the thread, but 1.4 gets my vote. +1 -- Martin Cooper > Don > > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > I remember the discussion about the JDK version for Struts 1.3 - but I can't > > remember if an actual decision was made. Have we decided o

Re: DTD 1.3

On 4/30/05, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 6:01 AM -0700 4/30/05, rmanchu wrote: > >Joe Germuska wrote: > > > >> > >>I'm happy to see this general pattern extended to any config > >>element. The cost is pretty low, and in fact, consistency would be > >>nice -- users shouldn't have to

[Shale] Heads Up ... Refactoring the dialog package

After thinking about it a bunch, I'm going to refactor the org.apache.shale.dialog package so that the basic package defines just interfaces, and move the configuration and implementation classes into subpackages. That will help clarify exactly what access an application should think it has to the

Re: Default method in DispatchActions

Hi, In my opinion default method has to be used when the parameter is specified but the value in the http request is not specified or it doesn't correspond to a method defined in the action. Can happen that developers need to collapse some method calls in the default method call. So I don't think t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34663] - DynaActionForm unable to find parameter method every second or third time.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DTD 1.3

At 6:01 AM -0700 4/30/05, rmanchu wrote: Joe Germuska wrote: I'm happy to see this general pattern extended to any config element. The cost is pretty low, and in fact, consistency would be nice -- users shouldn't have to worry about where they can use the "key" attribute in . Probably we shoul

svn commit: r165410 - in /struts/faces/trunk: ./ core-library/src/java/org/apache/struts/faces/taglib/ core-library/src/java/org/apache/struts/faces/util/ sysclient-app/src/java/org/apache/struts/faces/sysclient/

Author: jmitchell Date: Sat Apr 30 09:25:14 2005 New Revision: 165410 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165410&view=rev Log: bring faces current with all dependent subprojects(core, taglib, and tiles), upgrade to htmlunit 1.5 Modified: struts/faces/trunk/build.properties.sample str

Re: DTD 1.3

Joe Germuska wrote: I'm happy to see this general pattern extended to any config element. The cost is pretty low, and in fact, consistency would be nice -- users shouldn't have to worry about where they can use the "key" attribute in . Probably we should add some interface to cleanly represen

Re: DTD 1.3

At 1:40 AM -0700 4/30/05, rmanchu wrote: hi have gone thru the source and (if i'm not mistaken) i found the properties set in action mappings are never used within struts, its only for the user to set them and use them. This is true, for now, although one of the motivations was to make it possi

Re: DTD 1.3

hi have gone thru the source and (if i'm not mistaken) i found the properties set in action mappings are never used within struts, its only for the user to set them and use them. as the javadoc in *.config.ActionConfig * executed for this mapping. This facility should eliminate many use * case