Re: [VOTE] Struts Shale 1.0.0 Quality

2005-12-23 Thread Sean Schofield
[X ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) Non binding ... On 12/23/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/5/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Once you have had a chance to assess to quality of this build, please > > respond with a vote on the quality: > >

Re: [VOTE] Struts Shale 1.0.0 Quality

2005-12-23 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 12/5/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Once you have had a chance to assess to quality of this build, please > respond with a vote on the quality: [X] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) For all the previously mentioned reasons. :) The core-library Javadoc generation

Re: [shale] Remote Method Calls

2005-12-23 Thread netsql
Craig McClanahan wrote: It's only nowdays that XML config is out of fashion. I disagree on 2 levels. #1. I think everyone likes one simple XML. The noise was on some long and mutiple xmls frameworks. #2. Who care what the fad is! Oh well. I can use CoR anywhere I want, It sure would be a wa

Re: [shale] Remote Method Calls

2005-12-23 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 12/23/05, netsql <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One nice thing about Struts and Spring is that *everyone* knows how to > start examining and working on the application. > Just go to the config.xml! > > It tells you where to start and what gets called and I can open it and > start there. Once you

Re: [shale] Remote Method Calls

2005-12-23 Thread netsql
One nice thing about Struts and Spring is that *everyone* knows how to start examining and working on the application. Just go to the config.xml! It tells you where to start and what gets called and I can open it and start there. Once you get rid of a config .xml, there is no guide to the appl

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project struts-taglib (in module struts) failed

2005-12-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project struts-taglib has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project struts-taglib (in module struts) failed

2005-12-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project struts-taglib has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

Re: [shale] Remote Method Calls

2005-12-23 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 12/23/05, David Geary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At JavaPolis, I showed a couple of Ajax demos using Shale remote method > calls. After the demos, I got to thinking... > > The back-end stuff for remoting--AbstractListCompletions and company--is > great. But I don't understand the requirement

[shale] Remote Method Calls

2005-12-23 Thread David Geary
At JavaPolis, I showed a couple of Ajax demos using Shale remote method calls. After the demos, I got to thinking... The back-end stuff for remoting--AbstractListCompletions and company--is great. But I don't understand the requirement that remote calls must be made to Commons Chain commands. That

Rép : [shale] Dialogs and Convention over Configuration

2005-12-23 Thread David Geary
I'm not advocating my off the cuff solution, which of course has drawbacks. I'm just suggesting that we think about something along these lines. I wouldn't mind seeing a less powerful interface, if you will, into dialogs that requires no configuration. btw, it seems to me that, to some degree, COC

RE: [shale] Dialogs and Convention over Configuration

2005-12-23 Thread Gary VanMatre
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hei > > If we where to look into a better configuration control, I would suggest > taking > a close look at Apache Jackrabbit (JSR-170). This gives among a lot of good > things, versioning. You can even run with (Embedded) Derby as a backend, or > just > a pl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38007] - duplicate processing instructions when using jspx

2005-12-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Miles Palis is not available until 01/03/2006

2005-12-23 Thread miles_palis
I will be out of the office starting 12/23/2005 and will not return until 01/03/2006. I will respond to your message when I return. Please contact Brian Arnett if you need your questions address prior to my return.