Re: download.cgi (was: Re: Redirects and .htaccess)

2006-01-11 Thread Martin Cooper
On 1/11/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/6/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/6/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > (I also forgot to fix the file permissions on download.cgi, but no one > > > reported that!) > > > > > > That's odd. At some point

Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps

2006-01-11 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 1/4/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Regardless, I'm thinking that we should rename the "acquiring.xml" to > "downloads.xml", since that's the usual name, and the one I should > have used in the first place. Done, so Maven will stop saying we haven't had any releases. The old acqui

download.cgi (was: Re: Redirects and .htaccess)

2006-01-11 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 1/6/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/6/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (I also forgot to fix the file permissions on download.cgi, but no one > > reported that!) > > > That's odd. At some point, I deliberately set the permissions on that file > so that I was th

svn commit: r368255 - in /struts: action/trunk/xdocs/learning.xml action/trunk/xdocs/navigation.xml action/trunk/xdocs/userGuide/installation.xml scripting/trunk/xdocs/navigation.xml scripting/trunk/x

2006-01-11 Thread wsmoak
Author: wsmoak Date: Wed Jan 11 20:18:36 2006 New Revision: 368255 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=368255&view=rev Log: Changed links from acquiring.html to downloads.html after renaming the page. Modified: struts/action/trunk/xdocs/learning.xml struts/action/trunk/xdocs/navigation

svn commit: r368247 - in /struts/site/trunk/xdocs: acquiring.xml downloads.xml helping.xml index.xml navigation.xml releases.xml

2006-01-11 Thread wsmoak
Author: wsmoak Date: Wed Jan 11 19:09:12 2006 New Revision: 368247 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=368247&view=rev Log: Renamed 'acquiring.xml' to the standard 'downloads.xml'. Added: struts/site/trunk/xdocs/downloads.xml - copied unchanged from r368213, struts/site/trunk/xdocs/a

svn commit: r368229 - /struts/shale/trunk/build/project.xml

2006-01-11 Thread wsmoak
Author: wsmoak Date: Wed Jan 11 18:25:59 2006 New Revision: 368229 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=368229&view=rev Log: Corrected addresses for user list and archives. Reformatted mailing lists section. Modified: struts/shale/trunk/build/project.xml Modified: struts/shale/trunk/build/

Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps

2006-01-11 Thread Martin Cooper
On 1/11/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/11/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not sure where this ended up. > > > > Whether Resources is part of the jar in "extras" or not, I don't > > think we should have a dependency on any called "extras". > > "extra" (to me

Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps

2006-01-11 Thread Ted Husted
On 1/11/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not sure where this ended up. > > Whether Resources is part of the jar in "extras" or not, I don't > think we should have a dependency on any called "extras". > "extra" (to me) means "optional". Am I wrong on this? Who is the "we" that h

Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps

2006-01-11 Thread James Mitchell
I'm not sure where this ended up. Whether Resources is part of the jar in "extras" or not, I don't think we should have a dependency on any called "extras". "extra" (to me) means "optional". Am I wrong on this? -- James Mitchell EdgeTech, Inc. http://edgetechservices.net/ 678.910.8017 S

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28868] - RequestProcessor and ValidatorPlugIn is not serializable

2006-01-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28868] - RequestProcessor and ValidatorPlugIn is not serializable

2006-01-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [POLL] Struts Action Framework tagline

2006-01-11 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 1/11/06, Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just from my experience, I'd prefer if we didn't use the "2" > anywhere. We used "WebWork2" for a while and it really confused > things and broke up the brand. We've had much better success ever > since we actively eliminated "WebWork2" in

RE: [POLL] Struts Action Framework tagline

2006-01-11 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==== > > > On 1/11/06, netsql <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And... why not Struts, which is what user list calls it, instead of > > correcting them. > > Because, very shortly, we will be adopting the WebWork code bas

Re: [POLL] Struts Action Framework tagline

2006-01-11 Thread Ted Husted
On 1/11/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Using "CoR", or some variant of it, in the name is a very bad idea, IMHO, > because that is a reflection of the *implementation* of the framework, not > the style of it. +1. We talked about "Core" for a while, but that was Core as in "kernal"

Re: [POLL] Struts Action Framework tagline

2006-01-11 Thread Martin Cooper
On 1/10/06, Wolfgang Gehner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > James, could you warm up to "Struts COR" or CORe? Like you, I feel that > "Action" focuses on some "old" mechanics part of Struts. COR as in > Chain-Of-Command, which IMHO brought Struts forward a lot (I already > wrote an article about it

Re: [POLL] Struts Action Framework tagline

2006-01-11 Thread Patrick Lightbody
Just from my experience, I'd prefer if we didn't use the "2" anywhere. We used "WebWork2" for a while and it really confused things and broke up the brand. We've had much better success ever since we actively eliminated "WebWork2" in favor of just "WebWork". Some day there may be a 2.1 and

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38222] - German translation for Shale use cases sample app

2006-01-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r368049 - /struts/shale/trunk/use-cases/src/java/org/apache/shale/usecases/view/Bundle_de.properties

2006-01-11 Thread schof
Author: schof Date: Wed Jan 11 08:04:36 2006 New Revision: 368049 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=368049&view=rev Log: Patch for #38222 (patch by Matthias Wessendorf) Modified: struts/shale/trunk/use-cases/src/java/org/apache/shale/usecases/view/Bundle_de.properties Modified: struts

Re: [POLL] Struts Action Framework tagline

2006-01-11 Thread Ted Husted
On 1/11/06, netsql <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And... why not Struts, which is what user list calls it, instead of > correcting them. Because, very shortly, we will be adopting the WebWork code base as Struts Action 2.x, and, at the same time marching toward a stable release of Struts Action 1.3.

Re: [POLL] Struts Action Framework tagline

2006-01-11 Thread Michael Jouravlev
On 1/11/06, netsql <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And... why not Struts, which is what user list calls it, instead of > correcting them. Right. Ford Motor Co. has the following brands: Mercury, Lincoln and... Ford (don't get started with Jaguar, Volvo or Mazda). --

Re: [POLL] Struts Action Framework tagline

2006-01-11 Thread netsql
And... why not Struts, which is what user list calls it, instead of correcting them. .V James Mitchell wrote: Developer #2 - "Oh, that's odd" Developer #3 - "Hey guys, is that the new 'Ti' thing?" Developer #1 and #2 (in unison) - "No!"

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project struts-taglib (in module struts) failed

2006-01-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project struts-taglib has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project struts-taglib (in module struts) failed

2006-01-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project struts-taglib has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

Re: [POLL] Struts Action Framework tagline

2006-01-11 Thread Rich Feit
Wendy Smoak wrote: On 1/10/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In the interest of effective filtering, we should agree on a standard subject tag for the Struts Action framework. For the Struts Shale framework, we've been using [Shale]. So, for the other, should we use * [SAF 2.x] or

RE: svn commit: r367968 - in /struts/shale/trunk/use-cases/src: java/org/apache/shale/usecases/remoting/ java/org/apache/shale/usecases/view/ web/ajax/ web/validator/

2006-01-11 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Nevermind, just filed that ticket! -Matthias > -Original Message- > From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 10:21 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: RE: svn commit: r367968 - in > /struts/shale/trunk/use-cases/src: > java/org/ap

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38222] - German translation for Shale use cases sample app

2006-01-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38222] New: - German translation for Shale use cases sample app

2006-01-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: svn commit: r367968 - in /struts/shale/trunk/use-cases/src: java/org/apache/shale/usecases/remoting/ java/org/apache/shale/usecases/view/ web/ajax/ web/validator/

2006-01-11 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
David- I'll take care this evening of German translations -Matthias > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 9:31 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: svn commit: r367968 - in > /struts/shale/trunk/use-cases/src: >

svn commit: r367968 - in /struts/shale/trunk/use-cases/src: java/org/apache/shale/usecases/remoting/ java/org/apache/shale/usecases/view/ web/ajax/ web/validator/

2006-01-11 Thread dgeary
Author: dgeary Date: Wed Jan 11 00:31:12 2006 New Revision: 367968 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=367968&view=rev Log: Localized the first item in the zipcode pull-down menu for the Ajax form completion example. Localized the links, on the Ajax form completion and Validator examples, tha