Re: [Proposal] Flattening the sandbox

On 4/3/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd like to flatten the sandbox, leaving it up to each project whether > they want tags or branches. For Struts 1.2 and > earlier, the sandbox represented unfinished code relevant to the release, > however now, it is a sandbox for the whole > Str

Re: [Proposal] Merge Struts Scripting into Struts Extras

On 4/3/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd like to amend this to bringing scripting into action1 as its own > artifact, rather than integrating the code with extras. It will be easier > and since it already has its own build, it should fit fine the way it is. I guess I'm going throu

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Early Release of Action 2 MailReader Tour

On 4/4/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll post the Shale version at PlanetStruts too, so that we will have > all three online. Done. * http://planetstruts.org/shale-mailreader/ * http://planetstruts.org/action2-mailreader/ * http://planetstruts.org/struts-mailreader/ -T. ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39074] - java.lang.NullPointerException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39074] - java.lang.NullPointerException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39074] - java.lang.NullPointerException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Action2] Replacing the OpenSymphony copyright

On 4/4/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So you want both the OS copyright and Apache copyright on each file? If > there is a legal concern, I'm sure Patrick > could just draft something that says it only needs our copyright. I really > don't want to change the copyrights on every > fi

Re: [Action2] Replacing the OpenSymphony copyright

On 4/4/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So you want both the OS copyright and Apache copyright on each file? If > there is a legal concern, I'm sure Patrick > could just draft something that says it only needs our copyright. I > really don't want to change the copyrights on every > fi

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Early Release of Action 2 MailReader Tour

On 4/4/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cool stuff. From scanning the tour, it looks like you've added some > functionality (beyond just the basic UI and CRUD functionality) from the > original version, to show off what interceptors can do. Is there a > canonical list of this fun

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Early Release of Action 2 MailReader Tour

On 4/2/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > A first draft of a MailReader example application for WebWork2/Action2 > is available at > > * http://planetstruts.org/action2-mailreader/ > > The MailReader application was the first "proof of concept" > demonstration of the original Struts Act

Re: [Action2] Replacing the OpenSymphony copyright

So you want both the OS copyright and Apache copyright on each file? If there is a legal concern, I'm sure Patrick could just draft something that says it only needs our copyright. I really don't want to change the copyrights on every file again :) Don Martin Cooper wrote: On 4/3/06, Don Br

Re: [Action2] Replacing the OpenSymphony copyright

On 4/3/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Patrick's code grant came in, so we can now replace the copyright on all > the OpenSymphony-licensed files. I don't think we need to replace the copyright notice. We definitely need to add the ASF copyright notice, but a software grant does not

Re: Action 1 consolidation testing (was Towards a stable 1.3 release)

I believe the .current one is an older copy. I'll clean that up shortly. -- James Mitchell On Apr 3, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote: On 4/3/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The 'actual' shell script that gets run nightly via cron is not under svn. Since we run nightli

svn commit: r391362 - in /struts/sandbox/trunk/mailreader-course: action/ action/lab-1-1-src/ action/lab-1-2-src/ action/lab-1-3-src/ action/lab-1-4-src/ action/lab-2-1-src/ action1/ lab-1-1-src/ lab-

Author: husted Date: Tue Apr 4 09:45:26 2006 New Revision: 391362 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=391362&view=rev Log: mailreader-course * Add folders for each product Added: struts/sandbox/trunk/mailreader-course/action/ - copied from r391361, struts/sandbox/trunk/mailreader-co

Re: [Action2] Naming convention & Showcase example

I've done changing back the packaging and making sure the test case runs ok. Just in case there's any problem introduced, just post it on the malling list and I'll be glad to fix them. Thanks :-) - Original Message From: tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Struts Developers List Sent: Mond

svn commit: r391361 - in /struts/sandbox/trunk/mailreader-course: action1/ action2/ shale/

Author: husted Date: Tue Apr 4 09:39:29 2006 New Revision: 391361 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=391361&view=rev Log: mailreader-course * Add folders for each product Added: struts/sandbox/trunk/mailreader-course/action1/ struts/sandbox/trunk/mailreader-course/action2/ struts

Re: [Action2] Replacing the OpenSymphony copyright

On Apr 3, 2006, at 5:33 PM, Don Brown wrote: is there a "policy" on the use of the $Id line as the first line in the license? Does it require any subversion configuration for it to be replaced properly? If I understand correctly $id$, $Rev$, $Date$, etc. are internal subversion propertie

svn commit: r391304 - in /struts/site/xdocs: announce.xml faqs.xml index.xml kickstart.fml products.fml roadmap.fml

Author: husted Date: Tue Apr 4 06:31:45 2006 New Revision: 391304 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=391304&view=rev Log: Site * Add link to Security Bulletin * Rename products FAQ as roadmap FAQ. Added: struts/site/xdocs/roadmap.fml - copied, changed from r391299, struts/site/xd

[ANN] JAVAWUG BOF XVII / Thursday 20th April 2006 @ 19:00 / Oracl e City of London

Dear All I would like to formally announce that JAVAWUG (Java Web User Group) is holding the seventeenth Birds-of-Feather (Meet up XVII) at the Oracle City of London offices on Thursday, 20th April 2006. The meeting will take place in a room with Audio/Visual facilities between 7-9:30 pm. Ther