A first pass at Struts 2 distribution assemblies has been checked in.
It builds with:
cd ~/svn/struts/current/struts2
mvn install; cd assembly; mvn assembly:assembly
WW-1378 is open if you have comments.
--
Wendy
-
To unsubscr
Oops, works again. Spooky.
On 7/13/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any idea about what happens to wiki? It stopped to be accessible right now.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comman
Any idea about what happens to wiki? It stopped to be accessible right now.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This directive
#redirect
works, but it puts couple of parameters in the URL, also it shows a
"redirected from page ..." on top of the page.
On 7/13/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/13/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At present time Struts wiki contains Shale
On 7/13/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At present time Struts wiki contains Shale info. I guess it belongs to
Shale wiki if it exists. I think it does not exist yet. Someone with
appropriate rights should create new entry on http://wiki.apache.org/
page.
http://wiki.apache.org
At present time Struts wiki contains Shale info. I guess it belongs to
Shale wiki if it exists. I think it does not exist yet. Someone with
appropriate rights should create new entry on http://wiki.apache.org/
page.
-
To unsubscr
On 7/13/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In maven 2 speak is that a scope of "provided"? I can add that to the
Chain project.xml which would be good if there are any future Chain
releases - whether the existing 1.1 pom can be corrected after the
event I guess you'll know better tha
On 7/13/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/13/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree that automation is the Apache Way, but one could also just
> create a ZIP and drag into it each of the distributions, just so other
> people don't have to do the download thing four tim
Thx for taking the time off your heavy schedule for the reply Jason. :-)
Jason, below are some of my limited undestanding of the components. Please do
correct me if there's any slightest mistakes.
- Checkbox group
I guess this something like the current <@ww.radio /> tag where one could
I guess I am the one who volunteered, and I still do. If Jason could contribute
the code of those components, I could work on the docs, showcase etc, it would
be doable within the time frame. Else I think this will have to wait then.
> Putting the tree tag in took a lot of time, and I didn't
I'm kinda short on time at the moment myself.
/Ian
Jason Carreira wrote:
:-) I wasn't the one volunteering...
Putting the tree tag in took a lot of time, and I didn't even document it ;-)
I'd say these can wait.
-
Posted v
:-) I wasn't the one volunteering...
Putting the tree tag in took a lot of time, and I didn't even document it ;-)
I'd say these can wait.
-
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=37315&messag
If these components are ready to go today, and someone is committed to
putting them in Struts, adding documentation and the examples on
Showcase, then they can make Struts 2.0.0. Otherwise, I'd recommend
we hold off on new features, and focus instead on cleaning up the
current code and getting a
Well, the tree was the most complicated one, and we did contribute that one.
Other than that it's the common stuff:
* Checkbox group
* Tabbed Panel and Panel
* Wizard and Wizard Step
* Table and Column
Along with custom templates for the other UI tags for things like in-page
callbacks before a
On 7/13/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are you aware of anything other than
* the unwanted myfaces & portlet dependencies and
* the missing LICENSE/NOTICE that you mentioned on STR-2911
that would hold up your 1.3.5 build on Sunday?
No (and neither of those things would hold it up
I remember Jason saying about some custom component tags that he has been using
successfully in his day work.
Jason, would you mind sharing with us what the component tags are? If it is
possible to donate the code to Struts2? If not would you mind sharing with us
what the components are and
> I thought the general consensus was to ditch the Dojo wrapping?
Well, i guess so. But we are still keeping the dojo theme, just that it might
not be the default ajax theme. Am i right to say this?
After looking into the code a bit, I suppose we could remove the rich text
editor, cause text a
I can kind of understand with the calendar tag, since I had to write a custom
Dojo component, but the editor is a simple wrapper around the Dojo component.
There isn't any additional value in the UI tag, only more code to maintain for
us. I thought the general consensus was to ditch the Dojo wr
I'd prefer to keep them both.
- Original Message
From: Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List
Sent: Friday, 14 July, 2006 1:26:08 AM
Subject: Re: [s2] Dojo widgets?
Perhaps I'm reading your reply wrong, but my proposal was to get rid of the
Struts calendar and edit
Perhaps I'm reading your reply wrong, but my proposal was to get rid of the
Struts calendar and editor tags, since they weren't providing much value.
Instead, we'd point users to this new OpenSymphony project if they wanted a
fully-featured calendar or editor tag.
Do you want to move the calen
I like Don's proposal, and would prefer to keep to dojo's calendar, rich text
editor etc.
rgds
- Original Message
From: Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List
Sent: Thursday, 13 July, 2006 12:23:34 PM
Subject: Re: [s2] Dojo widgets?
To kind of answer my own question,
On 7/13/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree that automation is the Apache Way, but one could also just
create a ZIP and drag into it each of the distributions, just so other
people don't have to do the download thing four times.
I'm not sure what you mean... but if we're keeping
FYI - I'm working on a maven2 repo for opensymphony that will resolve this
issue.
-
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=37086&messageID=73119#73119
-
On 7/13/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do most projects that offer -src and -bin distributions also offer a
combined one?
Most projects don't have distributions so large that we divying it up
four ways :)
Keeping -all means everything in its assembly descriptor is duplicated
in
24 matches
Mail list logo
