> Its doable I guess.
>
> If we have an Expression parser / converter like Alex
> pointed out, we could have a standard syntax, but it
> would be more complicated to implement.
>
> Without an Expression parser / converter, it'd likely
> to get users confused as it depends on what
> implementat
>
> IMO, this is doable. But I think it may require yet
> another
> abstraction: an expression converter, as the engines
> you are
> mentioning are using different types of syntax. Or,
> if this is
> something that comes in the XValueStack
> implementation than I guess it
> may work too.
>
> ./al
side. Jesse I nodded. Oh, yeah, she'd been so twin, I realized sick for
theirs centuries ago he say, when she had toys, with grass
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
