On 4/21/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A key problem with an omnibus JAR isn't so much the other classes
(that the JVM wouldn't load) or the dependencies (that Maven wouldn't
import), but just handling the logging statements. In practice, the
optional code might want to try and initia
I'd like to propose a change on the way we do ajax validation. Instead of
using DWR which requires an external dependency and configuring a servlet,
I'd like to have an interceptor in the dojo plugin that extends the
validator interceptor, which outputs JSON with the messages when there are
valida
Another popular term for something like this is "extras". So, there
might be a Struts 1 Spring Extras JAR and maybe a Struts 1
JasperReports Extras JARs.
A key problem with an omnibus JAR isn't so much the other classes
(that the JVM wouldn't load) or the dependencies (that Maven wouldn't
import)
I am fine either way. Thanks for "explain"-ing :-)
On 4/21/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll assume that "explain" was intended between "you" and "your". ;-)
In response to Wendy's question, you indicated that you are proposing one
jar that includes the integration for multiple
I'll assume that "explain" was intended between "you" and "your". ;-)
In response to Wendy's question, you indicated that you are proposing one
jar that includes the integration for multiple external libraries. If I want
integration with Spring, for example, and not the other external libraries,
Martin,
Point taken on the module naming: "integration" is better.
Can you your focus on the "baggage"? With maven 2, dependencies can be
marked as optional. They all have to be there when compiling the source, but
not when depending on the library.
Paul
On 4/21/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTE
First off, calling this "modules" would be very confusing, since Struts 1
already has a concept of modules that is not at all related to what you are
looking to create. Since the purpose is integration with other libraries, I
would suggest "integration".
Second, I would strongly recommend against
Wendy, I was thinking of the first.
On 4/21/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/21/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am proposing a new module for Struts 1.x called "modules" which would
> contain integration classes into popular open source libraries. For
> starters
On 4/21/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am proposing a new module for Struts 1.x called "modules" which would
contain integration classes into popular open source libraries. For
starters, it would contain a new command to let Spring wire up the CRP
using a command.
I would sugge
I am proposing a new module for Struts 1.x called "modules" which would
contain integration classes into popular open source libraries. For
starters, it would contain a new command to let Spring wire up the CRP
using a command.
Paul
10 matches
Mail list logo
