Please ask this question in the Struts Users mailing list:
http://struts.apache.org/mail.html
Antonio
2007/7/23, msg2ajay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
hi,
The below is the "ActionClass" from which i am getting values from
"FORMBEAN" i am setting those value into the "jsp" page successfully. WHA
2007/7/23, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
What about the el library? Is it still worth keeping when requiring JDK
1.4 / EE 1.3 / Servlet 2.3?
AFAIK the EL in the container was introduced with Servlet 2.4/JSP 2.0.
Antonio
Ted,
the group id needs to be changed from opensymphony to com.opensymphony.
This change is already commited to branch the 2.0 branch.
Is your checkout uptodate?
-Rainer
> In the interest of time, I'm trying to pickup where James left off
> with the 2.0.9 release, so that we can get the XWork fix
hi,
The below is the "ActionClass" from which i am getting values from
"FORMBEAN" i am setting those value into the "jsp" page successfully. WHAT I
NEED NOW IS, IS IT POSSIBLE TO STORE THOSE VALUES INTO SOME VECTOR OR SOME
OTHER TYPE SO THAT I CAN DISPLAY A REPORT FORMAT. Because i have mor
Thanks Ted. I was just about to send you a message saying that I'd prefer you
did that. I looked into all of the steps to get a release out and it's more
than I'm ready
to take on at the moment. I don't have any of the SSH/PGP keys setup yet and I
don't want to hold up the release while I learn
Never mind. I thought my local copy was current, but it wasn't, and
after I updated, it started to build.
On 7/22/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The bad news is that I'm having trouble building Struts 2.0.9 against
XWork 2.0.4. Maven complained that it couldn't download the JAR, so I
What about the el library? Is it still worth keeping when requiring JDK
1.4 / EE 1.3 / Servlet 2.3?
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 7/22/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see your point, Paul. But the problem is that, moving to Struts 1.4,
the Tiles module will be tagged as 1.4 version
In the interest of time, I'm trying to pickup where James left off
with the 2.0.9 release, so that we can get the XWork fix out into the
wild.
The good news is that I have confirmed that dropping in the new XWork
2.0.4 JAR does fix the problem for Struts 2.0.8, and probably prior.
Anyone who want
No, this is not a requirement. That may be a convention for some
companies, but it is definitely NOT a requirement to use the framework.
--
James Mitchell
On Jul 20, 2007, at 2:15 PM, ojasrege wrote:
Most of the code I see places the developer defined struts Java
classes in a
package
On 7/7/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Struts 1.3.9 test build is now available.
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
+1 GA (non-binding).
GPG is good, MD5 is good, the src zip builds happily and the svn diff
between 1.3.8 and 1
The project Struts 2 SVN - Main Build (Java 6) has the following 1 change by 1
author:
*jholmes* made the following changes at
Comment:
Minor error message change.
> /struts/struts2/trunk/plugins/spring/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/spring/StrutsSpringObjectFactory.java
> (558575)
-
On 7/22/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see your point, Paul. But the problem is that, moving to Struts 1.4,
the Tiles module will be tagged as 1.4 version as well. IMHO this
leads to a false idea that Tiles is evolving (for example, the DTD).
No more than any of the other mo
Internally, it will be tagged STRUTS_1_4, and the JavaDocs will refer
to Struts Tiles 1.4.0 rather than Struts Tiles 1.3.9, but I don't
think that will confuse anyone. Meanwhile, Apache Tiles is now
distributing 2.0.4 (beta). More importantly, until Apache Tiles has a
GA release, it would be dange
2007/7/21, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
O the provocation! Just kidding. It's a good idea, but it's too soon.
There were similar discussions about dropping struts-faces because it's
really no longer supported. The difference is the amount of time between
the lack of support. I still use Til
On 7/21/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 GA
+1 GA
--
Joe Germuska
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com
"I felt so good I told the leader how to follow."
-- Sly Stone
If your DSL holds out, go ahead and give it a try. If you run into any
snags give me a call at 585-200-2997, so we can sort it out and update
the notes on the release process. As mentioned, the only weird parts
are the signing and wrapping up the docs and J4. What really helps is
if someone can sp
16 matches
Mail list logo
