George, again for the third time, please ask this question to the Struts
USERS mailing list:
http://struts.apache.org/mail.html
Antonio
2007/8/9, GEDA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> Hi. Regarding the integration of tiles plugin, I have two questions:
>
> 1) where should I put de tiles-defs.xml file ?
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 03:32:43PM +1000, Don Brown wrote:
> I believe the traditional purpose of the "closed" state is for a QA
> department, so they can mark the issues they have verified to be
> fixed. In Struts, I don't think we really do that, and while we do
> informal code reviews (commit e
Hi. Regarding the integration of tiles plugin, I have two questions:
1) where should I put de tiles-defs.xml file ?
2) Where should I put the element in order to include the
plugin in my web app ?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Integrating-Tiles-with-Struts-
I believe the traditional purpose of the "closed" state is for a QA
department, so they can mark the issues they have verified to be
fixed. In Struts, I don't think we really do that, and while we do
informal code reviews (commit emails), we certainly don't require
formal test documents that verif
I'll volunteer to add this unless someone else wants to.
On 8/7/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Have we codified this somewhere? I didn't see a commit go by, but then I'm
> still catching up.
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> On 8/4/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
According to JIRA:
*Resolved = *A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by
reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.
***Closed = *The issue is considered finished, the resolution is correct.
Issues which are not closed can be reopened.
That seems pretty pr
Is there any practical advantage to closing a resolved issue after a release?
On 8/7/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don, the PITA truth is the only reason why I use Resolved up to a release.
> :-)
>
> On 8/7/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > My 2c is I don't see any
YikesSounds like there's more than a simple fix needed... Maybe
it's safer (for now, I'm pretty sure that I will bump into this
problem later) to just modify the workflow interceptors? What I need
is a simple check for a Boolean request attribute indicating if it
should be skipped or not. It's
Please ask this questions to the Struts Users Mailing List:
http://struts.apache.org/mail.html
Antonio
2007/8/8, ojasrege <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> When I make an error in my struts logic, the HTML page generation stops at
> that point and I see truncated HTML pages. However, I cannot find an
>
When I make an error in my struts logic, the HTML page generation stops at
that point and I see truncated HTML pages. However, I cannot find an error
message anywhere. For example, I recently didn't define a setter/getter in
an ActionForm for an html:hidden field I added to a JSP page, and so st
2007/8/7, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I agree, please remove it.
Ok pals, I think that, for the moment, I should revert the change to
remove the licenses from the examples, leaving it only in the pom.
Anyway the licenses must stay in the core/api/plugin code, right?
Antonio
---
11 matches
Mail list logo