+1 !
Ian Roughley schrieb:
> Guys -
>
> In the thread "Re: Dojo 0.9 final. Time to migrate in S2?" I noticed
> that Musachy mentioned that the s2.1.x tags were dojo 0.4.2. Is this
> the case for the 2.0.x branch as well?
>
> If it is, I was doing some research, and came across the following:*
>
Guys -
In the thread "Re: Dojo 0.9 final. Time to migrate in S2?" I noticed
that Musachy mentioned that the s2.1.x tags were dojo 0.4.2. Is this
the case for the 2.0.x branch as well?
If it is, I was doing some research, and came across the following:*
"Dojo* 0.4.3 is now available to downl
Hi Guys,
I'm going to chime in in support of Ruimo Uno here. We have had problems
with this too.
This is not a design issue. At the end of the day, the view is calling a
method and what that
method does is largely irrelevant. It may throw an exception, even if
you have carefully
designed your ap
Hi Guys,
I'm going to chime in in support of Ruimo Uno here. We have had problems
with this too.
This is not a design issue. At the end of the day, the view is calling a
method and what that
method does is largely irrelevant. It may throw an exception, even if
you have carefully
designed your ap
That sounds fine to me. We can roll 2.0.10 as soon as you are ready,
and then 2.1.0 as soon as the notes and such are updated.
On 8/23/07, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What should we do? I'm in favor of rolling a 2.0.10 beta release and a 2.1
> beta
> release. The 2.0.10 beta would g
What should we do? I'm in favor of rolling a 2.0.10 beta release and a 2.1 beta
release. The 2.0.10 beta would get the security fix out and allow users to get
an
incremental upgrade with low risk. The 2.1 beta would allow users to start
testing the new 2.1 features.
2.0.10 is virtually ready to g
The project Struts 2 SVN - Main Build (Java 6) has the following 1 change by 1
author:
*jholmes* made the following changes at
Comment:
Revert upgrade from OGNL 2.6.11 to 2.7. There were compilation issues in the
Struts 1 plugin due to differences in one of the OGNL interfaces that the
Struts
The project Struts 2 SVN - Main Build has the following 1 change by 1 author:
*jholmes* made the following changes at
Comment:
Revert upgrade from OGNL 2.6.11 to 2.7. There were compilation issues in the
Struts 1 plugin due to differences in one of the OGNL interfaces that the
Struts 1 plugin
The BOF schedule is up:
* http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/BirdsOfaFeatherUs07
Do we want to schedule a open roadmap discussion, or something.
It seems that there are three Struts events on the convention schedule:
* Migrating to Ajax (Ted Husted) 11/12 10a
* Using Groovy with Struts 2 (Mar
Good work Rene! I have read through the diffs, and they look nice.
Most of the biggest issues in 2.0.x should be fixed with this
backport! I'll build and run the sample app later and will post the
results when I'm done.
Thanks again!
Nils-H
On 8/23/07, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do
Done.
Am Do, 23.08.2007, 10:50, schrieb Nils-Helge Garli:
> Great! I'll review them when you're done.
>
> Nils-H
>
> On 8/23/07, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nils,
>>
>> Backporting :)
>> That's why I assigned them to me. It's working in our apps (done a lot
>> of
>> testing last few
The project Struts 2 SVN - 2.0.x Branch (Java 6) has the following 1 change by
1 author:
*Rene Gielen* made the following changes at
Comment:
WW-1989, WW-2052, WW-2053, WW-2101, WW-2105:
Backporting portlet servlet wrapping, portlet redirect/redirectAction result
and related issues to 2.0.x
>
The project Struts 2 SVN - 2.0.x Branch has the following 1 change by 1 author:
*Rene Gielen* made the following changes at
Comment:
WW-1989, WW-2052, WW-2053, WW-2101, WW-2105:
Backporting portlet servlet wrapping, portlet redirect/redirectAction result
and related issues to 2.0.x
> /struts/s
The project Struts 2 SVN - 2.0.x Branch (Java 6) has the following 1 change by
1 author:
*Rene Gielen* made the following changes at
Comment:
WW-1989, WW-2052, WW-2053, WW-2101, WW-2105:
Backporting portlet servlet wrapping, portlet redirect/redirectAction result
and related issues to 2.0.x
>
The project Struts 2 SVN - 2.0.x Branch has the following 3 changes by 1 author:
*Rene Gielen* made the following changes at
Comment:
WW-1989, WW-2052, WW-2053, WW-2101, WW-2105:
Backporting portlet servlet wrapping, portlet redirect/redirectAction result
and related issues to 2.0.x
> /struts/
The project Struts 2 SVN - 2.0.x Branch (Java 6) has the following 3 changes by
1 author:
*Rene Gielen* made the following changes at
Comment:
WW-1989, WW-2052, WW-2053, WW-2101, WW-2105:
Backporting portlet servlet wrapping, portlet redirect/redirectAction result
and related issues to 2.0.x
Great! I'll review them when you're done.
Nils-H
On 8/23/07, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nils,
>
> Backporting :)
> That's why I assigned them to me. It's working in our apps (done a lot of
> testing last few days), so it looks safe to me to check in.
> When I'm done with checking in
Nils,
Backporting :)
That's why I assigned them to me. It's working in our apps (done a lot of
testing last few days), so it looks safe to me to check in.
When I'm done with checking in, I'll assign these issues back to you for
reviewing, if you don't mind.
Regards,
Rene
Am Do, 23.08.2007, 10:11
Are these issues re-opened because of the back-porting to 2.0.10, or
because they do not work in trunk?
Nils-H
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
19 matches
Mail list logo
