I got distracted last night, but I'll give it another try tonight.
On 9/5/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, if everyone is good to go on Struts 2.0.10, I could roll it Sunday
night (9 Sep).
-Ted.
http://husted.com/ted/blog/
So, I've been having great fun with the SmartURLs plugin, and, well, I
have some notes :)
I'd be happy to open issues for each of these on the Google Code site,
but I thought it might be fun to bunch them together for the group.
* Is SEO Search Engine Optimization? What makes hello-action more
I'm on board with Don's direction, and I'd like to try doing a
ReSTful, Zero-Configuration, Code Behind MailReader this week, based
on Brian's SmartURLs plugin, which is putting it all together in a
single package.
I believe the key point is that we have to develop architectures and
coding
+1
Ted, I'm with you 100%. James Mitchell and Bill Siggelkow have been preaching to
me about Rails for 6 months now and I have finally taken the time to dig in
deeper. And they are right! It has some amazing concepts. I can't wait to see
how
we can evolve Struts towards achieving some of the
Sounds good!
On Mon Sep 10 9:33 , 'Ted Husted' [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
I got distracted last night, but I'll give it another try tonight.
On 9/5/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, if everyone is good to go on Struts 2.0.10, I could roll it Sunday
night (9 Sep).
-Ted.
Yes, SmartURLs does provide annotations for responding to multiple Action names.
* http://code.google.com/p/smarturls-s2/wiki/CustomizationViaAnnotations
On 9/10/07, Ian Roughley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The one issue that I haven't found a good solution for (and my apologies
if it exists in
Is it ok to update the tag reference for the ajax tags on the wiki,
and make them point to 2.1?
This could be confusing as we don't have any 2.1 release yet, but the
pages are broken right now:
http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/autocompleter.html
musachy
--
Hey you! Would you help me to carry
Seems fine to me, but you should put a note on the page highlighting the fact
that the documentation is for the 2.1 version so that users are not confused.
On Mon Sep 10 12:33 , 'Musachy Barroso' [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
Is it ok to update the tag reference for the ajax tags on the wiki,
and
Musachy Barroso wrote:
This could be confusing as we don't have any 2.1 release yet, but the
pages are broken right now:
Right now some of them are broken. If you make this change, there will
instead be some that are wrong (since most people referring to them will
still be using 2.0.x).
Thanks Ted. The assumption is still that the action names are in the
same package, so I added a new feature request for an annotation that
combines the action and namespace. I find this particularly useful when
a single action class can be used from several workflows, yet the URL
Excellent feedback. Here's my thoughts:
* Is SEO Search Engine Optimization? What makes hello-action more
compliant than HelloAction?
Most search engines do not understand or favor camel case as well as the
dash or underscore. In fact, some engines will favor the dash character
over
@Namespace(/foo)
@ActionName(bar)
should work for most cases where the class is not reused. Adding an
optional namespace attribute to the ActionName or handling slashes in
the ActionName value will help in those more reusable cases. Something like:
@ActionName(/foo/bar)
or
I was planning on release 1.0 of SmartURLs in the near future and doing
some announcements to the user lists and some other locations. However,
should I wait on that if favor of rolling this back into core, or should
I go ahead?
Thoughts?
-bp
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic
+1 for waiting and rolling it into core, it could be available for 2.1
musachy
On 9/10/07, Brian Pontarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was planning on release 1.0 of SmartURLs in the near future and doing
some announcements to the user lists and some other locations. However,
should I wait
Why wait? People using Struts 2.0.x could use it now. Struts 2.1.x
could be out next week, or next month, or next year. There's really no
telling.
I'm not sure what rolling it into the core means. If it means
putting the source into the Struts-Core JAR, then I'd probably be
opposed. Personally,
On 9/10/07, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/9/10, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I got distracted last night, but I'll give it another try tonight.
I just ported the release plugin configuration to the 2_0_X branch.
If you want, you can use the 2.1.x wiki as a reference to
Hmm...along those lines, could SmartURL be Codebehind 2.0?
As for 2.1, I'm working on a huge patch to xwork 2.1 that will, among
other things, make OGNL pluggable and fully migrate the code to
container injection (no statics!). I should be done sometime this
week.
Don
On 9/11/07, Ted Husted
I meant to respond to this sooner, but forgot. Your last email reminded me.
This is great news. Perhaps now is the time to implement the OGNL 2.7
performance enhancements. From what I could make of following some threads
(here and on TheServerSide.com) MVEL is not necessarily any faster than OGNL
IMO this should be a core feature of struts 2.
musachy
On 9/10/07, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm...along those lines, could SmartURL be Codebehind 2.0?
As for 2.1, I'm working on a huge patch to xwork 2.1 that will, among
other things, make OGNL pluggable and fully migrate the code
I guess you really don't know until you benchmark it, but I'm a bit
skeptical that compiling and caching all OGNL expressions is going to
be the silver bullet. First, I wonder if the queries are similar
enough that it would make a big difference, and would we now be eating
up a significant
The reason the zero config stuff is in core is mainly because it
requires a configuration provider, which cannot be plugged in via a
struts plugin. Is there any other technical reason that this should
be in core?
Don
On 9/11/07, Musachy Barroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO this should be a
21 matches
Mail list logo
