2008/3/29, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Looks like another improvement
> could be made to "attach" the assemblies so they don't have to be
> built separately
In Tiles, the assemblies are attached and deployed to the Maven
repository, but they are significantly smaller artifacts than Struts
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Jeromy Evans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ie. is it safe to execute the release goal with -DdryRun=true? or does
> this risk committing?
Yes, it's safe. As long as you don't misspell dryRun (I've missed the
capital R before...)
Even if you do accidentally co
2008/3/29, Jeromy Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ie. is it safe to execute the release goal with -DdryRun=true? or does
> this risk committing?
I suppose that you are referring to "release:prepare" goal.
It is safe, since all the changes are made locally and not committed
(tested with Tiles).
An
2008/3/29, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What do you mean by dry run? The release:prepare goal has a
> -DdryRun=true parameter... but AFAIK Struts does not use the release
> plugin. (Yet?)
In fact it does:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WW/creating-and-signing-a-struts-21x-distribution.html
Anto
