> -Original Message-
> From: Jeromy Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 5:56 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework
>
>
> I've concluded that tag libraries for rich client framework
> like these no longer warr
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Jeromy Evans <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed. The Dojo 0.43 plugin in Struts2.1.1 contains significant
> improvements over the Dojo 0.40 tags bundled in 2.0.x. It's worth releasing
> as-is and I'd give it a +1 today.
>
> It sounds like there's enough people i
Dave Newton wrote:
Nutshell: what's anybody's take on the effort this would require, and who's
available to make that effort?
I share similar sentiment and at most will just be able to convert my
existing 2.1.1 test applications over to use the Dojo 1.x plugin to
investigate the conseque
Agreed. The Dojo 0.43 plugin in Struts2.1.1 contains significant
improvements over the Dojo 0.40 tags bundled in 2.0.x. It's worth
releasing as-is and I'd give it a +1 today.
It sounds like there's enough people interested to complete a Dojo 1.x
plugin. I also think it's worth creating a go
I don't think we should wait at all. Refactoring dojo out of core was
one of the main things for 2.1 and it's been there for a year already.
Unless Dojo 1.0 is a lot, way, way better than the older versions, I
would say you will find lots of surprises. IMO you should set it up as
a project on googl
--- Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whilst I can see that there is an advantage to getting a 2.1 release out,
> my question would be do we want it to go out with a (very) old version
> of dojo as the demonstration of it's modern ajax capabilities?, and do
> we want to put developers throug
I'm split on this.
Whilst I can see that there is an advantage to getting a 2.1 release out, my
question would be do we want it to go out with a (very) old version of dojo
as the demonstration of it's modern ajax capabilities?, and do we want to
put developers through getting used to 0.4 as th
done
>
> probably worth it.
>
> Otherwise
>
> people should
>
>
> org.apache.struts
> struts2-core
> .
>
>
> freemarker
>
David,
No problem, the easiest was to compile is to download Struts2 head
(instructions at http://struts.apache.org/dev/builds.html), locate the
plugins\dojo directory, delete it, and replace with the directory from the
zip file.
As for the compiling, follow the build instructions for struts
I am working on this update right now.
cheers,
Rainer
>
> probably worth it.
>
> Otherwise
>
> people should
>
>
> org.apache.struts
> struts2-core
> .
>
>
>
Hi,
I'd propose to get out 2.1.1 test build asap and integrate the latest dojo
stuff into 2.1.2-dev as well as the other updated plugins.
I'd volunteer for this unless Musachy has time to do so.
So we can test all other features and enhancements we integrated in the
past months and can continue w
> -Original Message-
> From: Al Sutton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 12:44 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework
>
> All of the bits are left in place so that the source can be
> re-integrated as easily as pos
I think there's been a lot of back end changes, but they have a couple of
API change docs at
http://dojotoolkit.org/book/dojo-porting-guide-0-4-x-0-9
and
http://dojotoolkit.org/book/dojo-porting-guide-0-9-x-1-0
My stuff is definitely a work in progress, so I'm sure people will hit bugs,
but
All of the bits are left in place so that the source can be re-integrated as
easily as possible when appropriate.
At the moment it's a drop in replacement in the struts2 tree, further down
the line the svn directories will provide the ability to merge the changes
in as smoothly as possible.
I'm not sure how deep the tests are, but only two needed changing, and those
two were the header tests which needed an update to reflect a removed config
parameter and a pair of parameters that were combined and renamed.
It's working for my needs at the moment, but I'm pretty more bugs will be
You can do, I'm keeping it on my system atm, so I'm happy to co-ordinate
changes.
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Karr, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 11:32 PM
Subject: RE: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework
Is it appropri
16 matches
Mail list logo
