> What I meant is that with some effort, instead of the convention plugin
> providing both Configuration and Mapping/Invocation is could be split into
> two: a plugin that provides config via annotation and a plugin that provides
> mapping & invocation conventions. If that were the case then devel
What I meant is that with some effort, instead of the convention plugin
providing both Configuration and Mapping/Invocation is could be split
into two: a plugin that provides config via annotation and a plugin that
provides mapping & invocation conventions. If that were the case then
developer
Sounds good Musachy.
Musachy Barroso wrote:
As far as I can see the only dependency between REST and Codebehind is
this class:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/struts2/trunk/plugins/rest/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/rest/ControllerClasspathPackageProvider.java?view=markup
which all it d
I would also recommend checking out the eclipse bea workshop support for
struts1. This was pretty darn good as it gave a visual representation of
your action mappings as well as a lot of other deep data features.
http://dev2dev.bea.com/downloads/StrutsDemo/StrutsDemo.html
-
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not really, but so far some people think we should support it on
> others think it is a bad idea.
Right. But my point is that building consensus, while it may take longer,
provides a better basis on which to move forw
Well, votes can be just talk sometimes If someone wants to branch and
write a combination plugin or fix the dependency in another way, go for it.
Nothing wrong with experimental branches -- in fact Maven does this
constantly.
Paul
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTE
Not really, but so far some people think we should support it on
others think it is a bad idea.
musachy
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> As far as I can see the only depend
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I can see the only dependency between REST and Codebehind is
> this class:
>
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/struts2/trunk/plugins/rest/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/rest/ControllerClasspathPackageP
I think it also depends on the unknown mapping handler in Codebehind. The
class takes care of determining the jsp to use when nothing is specified in
the configurations.
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I can see the only dependency betwe
As far as I can see the only dependency between REST and Codebehind is
this class:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/struts2/trunk/plugins/rest/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/rest/ControllerClasspathPackageProvider.java?view=markup
which all it does is use Codebehind to detect actions that en
James,
You may want to try and team up with Yann Cébron who wrote the Struts 2
plugin for IntelliJ.
http://plugins.intellij.net/plugin/?id=1698
http://www.jetbrains.net/confluence/display/CONTEST/Struts2PluginChangeNotes#Struts2PluginChangeNotes-IDEA7
I have only played with it since I am no
I am not sure I follow you here. I am using both together (convention
+ REST modified to depend on convention), my action:
package actions;
public class OrdersController extends ActionSupport {
public String show() {
message = "Hello World!";
return SUCCESS;
}
}
(in the a
My head is spinning now :). Can you use REST with Xml Conf?
musachy
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:30 AM, Jeromy Evans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeromy Evans wrote:
>>
>> I wouldn't rush into this decision.
>>
>> Users of the REST plugin require @Namespace, @Result, etc annotations.
>> Creating a
I would also recommend checking out the eclipse bea workshop support for
struts1. This was pretty darn good as it gave a visual representation of
your action mappings as well as a lot of other deep data features.
http://dev2dev.bea.com/downloads/StrutsDemo/StrutsDemo.html
-
On Wednesday 14 May 2008 18:50:40 James Holmes wrote:
> Anyone have any ideas for what they'd like to see in a Struts 2 Eclipse
> plugin?
>
> I'm thinking of developing a follow up to Struts Console that is
> specifically targeted at Struts 2 and Eclipse.
>
> With the move to convention over config
15 matches
Mail list logo
