Открой Ñ Ð²Ð¾Ð¹ кли нинговы й бизнес

Открой домашний клининговый бизнес. Без сайта. Без продаж. Без инвестиций. Уже 20 лет успеха. http://zezz.ru или zezz. ru - Posted via Jive Forums http://

Re: Drop J4 support, was: Re: release process

Just removing it from the build won't do, as the dependencies are still in assembly/pom.xml. We cannot remove them, because the j4 profile won't work, so I am not sure what to do in this case. musachy On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > jdk 4 jars generation was removed fro

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > Thinking process: well, this is a build artifact which is not even > part of the distribution, and we already have +4 votes, do we really > need to wait 3 days for it? > > I wanted to get a 2.1 build rolling before everyone left for the > h

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:35 PM, James Holmes wrote: > +1 for not delaying the release of 2.1 for something we normally don't vote > for. You might want to check the archives. Spending 15 seconds at MarkMail shows that we have voted on Struts Annotations 1.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.0.2, 1.0.3 and now 1.0.4

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

+1 if we don't normally vote on it, it doesn't make sense to hold up progress. //not PMC, just adding opinion On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 20:35 -0500, James Holmes wrote: > +1 for not delaying the release of 2.1 for something we normally don't vote > for. > > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Musachy

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > Thinking process: well, this is a build artifact which is not even > part of the distribution, and we already have +4 votes, do we really > need to wait 3 days for it? It may not be part of the distribution, but it is still a release, an

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

+1 for not delaying the release of 2.1 for something we normally don't vote for. On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > Thinking process: well, this is a build artifact which is not even > part of the distribution, and we already have +4 votes, do we really > need to wait 3 da

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

Thinking process: well, this is a build artifact which is not even part of the distribution, and we already have +4 votes, do we really need to wait 3 days for it? I wanted to get a 2.1 build rolling before everyone left for the holidays. Can we just get rid of the voting for it altogether? musac

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > Here are the results of the vote for going GA with the Struts > Annotations release 1.0.4 What Martin said. Unless I missed something, you only posted the vote last night... I realize it's a pain to wait when you want to do a Struts rele

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

You're calling it after 19 hours? What happened to 72 hours? -- Martin Cooper On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > Here are the results of the vote for going GA with the Struts > Annotations release 1.0.4 > > Binding: > +1 Don Brown > +1 Rainer Hermanns > +1 Musachy Barros

Re: [VOTE RESULT] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

s/James Homes/James Holmes/, sorry ;) On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > Here are the results of the vote for going GA with the Struts > Annotations release 1.0.4 > > Binding: > +1 Don Brown > +1 Rainer Hermanns > +1 Musachy Barroso > +1 James Homes > > I'll post an announc

[VOTE RESULT] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

Here are the results of the vote for going GA with the Struts Annotations release 1.0.4 Binding: +1 Don Brown +1 Rainer Hermanns +1 Musachy Barroso +1 James Homes I'll post an announcement when the files are available. musachy -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd

Re: struts-2.0.dtd

The best way to make sure we don't drop it, is to open a jira ticket with the details (bonus points if patch is included :) ). musachy On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Biesbrock, Kevin wrote: > Hello Developers, > > I was wondering if the public DTD could be updated to match what is > released w

struts-2.0.dtd

Hello Developers, I was wondering if the public DTD could be updated to match what is released with the struts2-core-2.x.jar. Since, to my knowledge, it is only missing the def-class-ref attribute, I don't believe it would hurt any backward compatibility and would only benefit. I had a comment i

Re: Struts 2.1 plans

Never mind sorry. I see xwork 2.1.2 is in released form. I had to change our pom from point at the snapshot. Matt matt.payne wrote: > > This just broke our Struts 2.1.3 in maven. > > on line 99 of struts-default.xml > com.opensymphony.xwork2.DefaultUnknownHandlerManager > > This class doe

Re: error building site

I would say, we use: scp://people.apache.org/www/struts.apache.org/${pom.version} for the site, and then add an step to the documentation, where the content of that folder is copied to 2.x, plus the javadocs and anything else needed. Does that sound good? musachy On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:39 PM

Re: Struts 2.1 plans

update and build xwork, or update /pom.xml. musachy On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:47 PM, matt.payne wrote: > > This just broke our Struts 2.1.3 in maven. > > on line 99 of struts-default.xml > com.opensymphony.xwork2.DefaultUnknownHandlerManager > > This class does not exist in xwork (maven). Pleas

Re: Struts 2.1 plans

This just broke our Struts 2.1.3 in maven. on line 99 of struts-default.xml com.opensymphony.xwork2.DefaultUnknownHandlerManager This class does not exist in xwork (maven). Please introduce a new xwork jar before releasing this change to struts. Anyway this can be fixed soon? Matthew Payne

Re: error building site

I think 2.x is like, the latest 2.y.z release that was made + javadocs. I am trying to document this step: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Creating+and+Signing+a+Struts+2.1.x+Distribution+(New)#CreatingandSigningaStruts2.1.xDistribution(New)-9.Updatesite(toplevel) I don't know how t

Re: error building site

On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > Why is the site deployed to: > > scp://people.apache.org/www/struts.apache.org/2.x/ > > instead of: > > scp://people.apache.org/www/struts.apache.org/${pom.version}? > I

Re: Will Struts 2.0.14 work with JDK 1.4.2?

*Please* move this to the struts-user list as I requested earlier. Thanks, Dave --- On Tue, 12/23/08, roro wrote: From: roro Subject: Re: Will Struts 2.0.14 work with JDK 1.4.2? To: dev@struts.apache.org Date: Tuesday, December 23, 2008, 1:35 PM I've made a bit of progress. I tried to set up

Re: error building site

Why is the site deployed to: scp://people.apache.org/www/struts.apache.org/2.x/ instead of: scp://people.apache.org/www/struts.apache.org/${pom.version} ? I don't get what the 2.x folder is for. musachy On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > I just needed to send the email

Re: Will Struts 2.0.14 work with JDK 1.4.2?

I've made a bit of progress. I tried to set up Struts 2 with JRE 1.6 and tomcat 6.0 and I've successfully run it. Then I'm duplicating similar setup with struts 2, jdk 1.4.2 and tomcat 5.0.28 and I ran across filterStart error. I've read the tutorial on how to use retrotranslator and I've conve

Re: error building site

I just needed to send the email to find the answer: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/maven/trunk/pom/pom.xml musachy On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > When I try to build the site > (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/site), I get this error: > > Caused by: or

error building site

When I try to build the site (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/site), I get this error: Caused by: org.apache.maven.project.ProjectBuildingException: POM 'org.apache.struts:struts-master' not found in repository: Unable to download the artifact from any repository org.apache.struts:struts

Re: [VOTE] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

I had that question myself, it is not like we support this tool to be used by anyone else. Anyway, here is my +1 GA musachy On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:24 AM, Don Brown wrote: > Doh, make that +1 GA ... is a quality vote really required for > internal, compile-time libraries? We don't vote on th

Re: [VOTE] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

+1 GA On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > The Struts Annotations 1.0.4 test build is now available as a Maven > artifact. It is a dependency of Struts 2.1.3. > > If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with > a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave a

Re: [VOTE] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

+1 GA cheers, Rainer > The Struts Annotations 1.0.4 test build is now available as a Maven > artifact. It is a dependency of Struts 2.1.3. > > If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with > a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] Gen

Re: [VOTE] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

Doh, make that +1 GA ... is a quality vote really required for internal, compile-time libraries? We don't vote on the quality of POM files, and those are more public. Don On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Don Brown wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: >> The S

Re: [VOTE] Struts Annotations 1.0.4

+1 On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > The Struts Annotations 1.0.4 test build is now available as a Maven > artifact. It is a dependency of Struts 2.1.3. > > If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with > a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at tes