ÐÑодажа: меÑизÑ, кÑепеж, канаÑÑ, пÑоволока,
ÑлекÑÑодÑ, ÑеÑка, калибÑованнÑй пÑокаÑ,
кÑÑг, ÑеÑÑигÑанник, канаÑÑ ÑÑалÑнÑе, канаÑ
оÑинкованнÑй, ÐºÐ°Ð½Ð°Ñ Ð¿ÐµÐ½ÑковÑй, канаÑ
fixed so no manual update is necessary (get version from pom).
musachy
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> We tried to push it as a GA, but it had a problem which prevented us
> from doing so. But now that you mention it, that link should be
> pointing to 2.1.4, which means
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 3:18 AM, GF wrote:
> On http://struts.apache.org/2.x/
> There is a link to Struts 2.1.3
> http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi#struts213
> And clicking on that click there isn't any reference to Struts 2.1.3 download.
>
> Moreover is 2.1.3 a GA release? because I don't th
We tried to push it as a GA, but it had a problem which prevented us
from doing so. But now that you mention it, that link should be
pointing to 2.1.4, which means that someone forgot to update the docs.
/roll_eyes. We can update the page without having to rebuild just to
update one link right?
mu
+1, we should take a look at it. I didnt even know it was around.
musachy
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:42 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
>
>> There is something here -
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/nightlies/2.x/
>>
>> I'm not su
On http://struts.apache.org/2.x/
There is a link to Struts 2.1.3 http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi#struts213
And clicking on that click there isn't any reference to Struts 2.1.3 download.
Moreover is 2.1.3 a GA release? because I don't think it's good to
link on the project homepage to an unst
