+1 GA
I created an app with it and ran it embedded in pluto, and it works as expected.
musachy
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik
wrote:
> Okey, giving this another shot!
>
> The Struts 2 Portlet Archetype 2.1.6 is ready for testing. To test it,
> point Maven 2 to the stag
Okey, giving this another shot!
The Struts 2 Portlet Archetype 2.1.6 is ready for testing. To test it,
point Maven 2 to the staging repository and follow the documentation
at http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Struts+2+Maven+Archetypes
Maven 2 staging repository:
http://people.apache.o
I'm taking this vote down due to some signing issues. I'll create a
new proper release and open a new vote. No votes has been registered.
Nils-H
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik
wrote:
> Okey, this is my first vote thread, so please bear with me and correct
> me if I'm d
meh :)
musachy
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> Musachy, if you break Bamboo one more time, I'm going to quit fixing it! :-D
>
> -Wes
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:37 PM, wrote:
>> STRUTS-MAIN-1103 was successful.
>> Code has been updated by Wes Wannemacher.
>> 1005 te
Musachy, if you break Bamboo one more time, I'm going to quit fixing it! :-D
-Wes
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:37 PM, wrote:
> STRUTS-MAIN-1103 was successful.
> Code has been updated by Wes Wannemacher.
> 1005 tests in total.
> Code Changes See full change details
> Wes Wannemacher
> adding profi
That's perfect, I have added a profile and look for a property called
skipAssembly... I'm going to check the wiki and see where to put info
on it. Once I update the doco, I'll commit it.
-Wes
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Musachy Barroso
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> The easiest thing we can do is to keep everything in by default, so
> releases are easy. And just add a profile that excludes assembly, that
> should work for everyone.
If it's in the list of modules in the default build, you can't get ri
yep, agreed, I'll do it right now
-Wes
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> The easiest thing we can do is to keep everything in by default, so
> releases are easy. And just add a profile that excludes assembly, that
> should work for everyone.
>
> musachy
>
> On Thu, Apr 23
The easiest thing we can do is to keep everything in by default, so
releases are easy. And just add a profile that excludes assembly, that
should work for everyone.
musachy
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> I can live with that, but you might have to help set it up... I d
I can live with that, but you might have to help set it up... I don't
know how to do an activation outside of a profile. Right now, assembly
is a module invoked when you run 'mvn install' from the top-level. Do
you mind setting it up so that we have a property, when defined, skips
the assembly phas
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> I'm not moving it to a plugin, I was going to move it to a profile.
Sorry, typo. :) I meant 'profile'.
> I was testing a simple change (you can see below). Basically, 'mvn clean
> install' will build everything and install it all into yo
I'm not moving it to a plugin, I was going to move it to a profile. I
was testing a simple change (you can see below). Basically, 'mvn clean
install' will build everything and install it all into your ~/.m2/repo
But, if you do 'mvn -Pall,assembly clean install' it will also build the zips.
The pr
that's an excellent idea.
musachy
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
>
>> Unless someone can raise a decent reason not to do it, I'd like to
>> move the assembly in the struts2 build into it's own profile. I don't
>> mi
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> Unless someone can raise a decent reason not to do it, I'd like to
> move the assembly in the struts2 build into it's own profile. I don't
> mind Hudson and Bamboo creating the zips through the assembly module,
> but I like to keep up-to-d
yeah that is fine Wes. When we re-organized the poms to make it easier
to build, we said we could add profiles later. When you change it,
please update the wiki that describes the release process.
musachy
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:30 AM,
Not yet, the MVEL stuff is pretty much a draft at this moment. We
could roll this in 2 steps, first stop using OGNL for parameter
binding, and then, plugin MVEL. After #1 is achieve, #2 should be
easy. The good thing is that the new parameter binding implementation
can be turned on/off with a const
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Rainer Hermanns wrote:
> Wes,
>
> +42, please do so... that was disturbing me as well a lot :)
> The build takes currently "forever", just to download all the docs.
>
> Thanks,
> Rainer
>
Yeah, when it's hudson pulling docs from apache hardware to apache
hardware,
Wes,
+42, please do so... that was disturbing me as well a lot :)
The build takes currently "forever", just to download all the docs.
Thanks,
Rainer
> Hey guys,
>
> Unless someone can raise a decent reason not to do it, I'd like to
> move the assembly in the struts2 build into it's own profile.
Hey guys,
Unless someone can raise a decent reason not to do it, I'd like to
move the assembly in the struts2 build into it's own profile. I don't
mind Hudson and Bamboo creating the zips through the assembly module,
but I like to keep up-to-date and running mvn clean install -Pall on
my machine t
19 matches
Mail list logo
