2011/6/1 John Lindal :
> I get “Wrong line number:
> http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-config-1.0.dtd:1:2” from
> com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.DefaultValidatorFileParserTest.testParserWithBadXML2()
Are you behind a firewall ? I had got such problem when I had been
trying to
\src\xwork-core\src\main\resources\xwork-validator-config-1.0.dtd
is valid dtd when tested at
http://www.validome.org/grammar/validate/
do you have the same DTD?
Martin Gainty
__
Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confiden
I get “Wrong line number:
http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-config-1.0.dtd:1:2” from
com.opensymphony.xwork2.validator.DefaultValidatorFileParserTest.testParserWithBadXML2()
I’m using Maven 2, but I can’t see how that would affect the unit tests.
Is anybody else getting this uni
+1
Spring 2.5 is really outdated now, working with 3.0+ only
- René
On 31.05.11 06:48, Johannes Geppert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what do you think about upgrading from Spring 2.5.6 dependencies to 3.0.5?
>
> I use this already in some applications without any trouble.
> Maybe this can be part of 2.3?
+1
I've been using it for a long time now without any problem.
Maurizio Cucchiara
Il giorno 31/mag/2011 06.49, "Johannes Geppert" ha
scritto:
> Hi,
>
> what do you think about upgrading from Spring 2.5.6 dependencies to 3.0.5?
>
> I use this already in some applications without any trouble.
> M
but the default maven repo is not linked with Spring3
we use Spring3,
the crash come when SpringMVC working together with S2.
CMIIW
F
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:59 AM, John Lindal wrote:
> +1
>
> I've been using Spring 3 with Struts 2 for quite a while now with no
> problems.
>
> John
>
>
> O
+1
I've been using Spring 3 with Struts 2 for quite a while now with no
problems.
John
On 5/30/11 9:48 PM, "Johannes Geppert" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what do you think about upgrading from Spring 2.5.6 dependencies to 3.0.5?
>
> I use this already in some applications without any trouble.
> Maybe
Good job guys,
+1 binding,
cheers,
Rainer
Am 30.05.2011 um 17:41 schrieb Rene Gielen:
> The code in sandbox was developed for replacing the current portlet
> plugin. If the vote passes, the code will be moved to the regular code
> base, which is a requirement before we can think about adding it