Re: Plan for Struts 3

2013-03-05 Thread Lukasz Lenart
Hi, I have few additional thoughts about S3 and the future. First with should drop support of S1 and use simple Struts as a project name - no more Struts2, Struts3, Struts4, ... Simple Struts and version 3.0.1, 4.1.0.1, etc. We should just keep support for one version back, so when we release

Re: Plan for Struts 3

2013-03-05 Thread Paul Benedict
I have no problem with dropping support for S1. :-) Question on the fourth version point: I don't think the four points plays all that nicely with maven. They are strictly 3 with anything else being a lexicographic ordering. I know we created the 4th point for emergency patch releases, but in

Re: Plan for Struts 3

2013-03-05 Thread Brian Holzer
Hi all, If you drop support for S1, what about those people still using S1? I'm guessing there are a lot of them out there. Brian Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org 3/5/2013 2:22 PM Hi, I have few additional thoughts about S3 and the future. First with should drop support of S1 and use

Re: Plan for Struts 3

2013-03-05 Thread Don Brown
All support for Struts 1 meant, afaik, is the ability to deploy side-by-side. We used a different Java package to allow the code to co-exist, however, the proposal as I understand it is to go back to org.apache.struts Don On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Brian Holzer bhol...@sgi.sk.ca wrote:

Re: Plan for Struts 3

2013-03-05 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/5 Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org: Question on the fourth version point: I don't think the four points plays all that nicely with maven. They are strictly 3 with anything else being a lexicographic ordering. I know we created the 4th point for emergency patch releases, but in

Re: Plan for Struts 3

2013-03-05 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/5 Brian Holzer bhol...@sgi.sk.ca: Hi all, If you drop support for S1, what about those people still using S1? I'm guessing there are a lot of them out there. Truly said, S1 is dead, I don't know how to prepare a release, I don't know the code base, there was no single commit since I

Re: Plan for Struts 3

2013-03-05 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/5 Don Brown donald.br...@gmail.com: All support for Struts 1 meant, afaik, is the ability to deploy side-by-side. We used a different Java package to allow the code to co-exist, however, the proposal as I understand it is to go back to org.apache.struts Yes, just to have one package

Re: Plan for Struts 3

2013-03-05 Thread Dave Newton
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Brian Holzer wrote: If you drop support for S1, what about those people still using S1? I'm guessing there are a lot of them out there. There are, but there are very, very few releases of S1 at this point, and few people with a need to upgrade past whatever

Re: Struts 2.3.11 ready for test

2013-03-05 Thread Johannes Geppert
I don't think it is a showstopper. This can also be fixed in one of the next releases. Johannes # web: http://www.jgeppert.com twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep 2013/3/4 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org 2013/3/4 Matt Raible

Re: Drop Struts 1 Support? Was: Plan for Struts 3

2013-03-05 Thread Rene Gielen
It seems to be quite obvious that we don't have enough volunteers willing to support Struts 1 in an effective way. As long as this does not change, we can't call Struts 1 a supported product any more. That said, I'm aware that there are a lot of people out there still using Struts 1. I think the

Re: Plan for Struts 3

2013-03-05 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Brian Holzer bhol...@sgi.sk.ca wrote: Hi all, If you drop support for S1, what about those people still using S1? I'm guessing there are a lot of them out there. I'd argue that it really hasn't been supported for some time now. I suppose if there were some

Re: Plan for Struts 3

2013-03-05 Thread Paul Benedict
Coincidentally, there is an active vote going on in Maven land to desupport Maven 1. It won't be final until tomorrow, I believe, but it was gotten overwhelming votes. I don't think we need any announcement to desupport Struts 1. However, we shouldn't wipe Struts 1 off the site. Every company

Re: Plan for Struts 3

2013-03-05 Thread Dave Newton
I don't think anybody was talking about removing all traces of it, just making the lack of support official. Dave

Re: Plan for Struts 3

2013-03-05 Thread Paul Benedict
That's good to know, Dave. I had some question on the meaning of support -- development, hosting, etc. If it's just stopping development, which was my hope, that's a fine choice.. But since there isn't any on-going development of S1 anyway, stopping it is a benign task. :-) On Tue, Mar 5,

Struts 2 - java.lang.ClassNotFoundException

2013-03-05 Thread john lee
   I use struts at webserver, and create proxy action , that proxy action forward to spring, but when executed result is the following   please advise   thanks in advance   john   [CODE] Struts Problem Report Struts has detected an unhandled exception: Messages: loginAction Invalid action class

Re: Struts 2 - java.lang.ClassNotFoundException

2013-03-05 Thread René Gielen
John, please ask support questions like this in the Struts user list. This list is for development of the framework itself. See http://struts.apache.org/mail.html Thanks, René john lee sh_thorn_b...@yahoo.com schrieb:    I use struts at webserver, and create proxy action , that proxy action

Re: Plan for Struts 3

2013-03-05 Thread René Gielen
The most important steps are to publicly announce EOL and mark resources as attic. - René Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org schrieb: That's good to know, Dave. I had some question on the meaning of support -- development, hosting, etc. If it's just stopping development, which was my hope,

Re: Struts 2.3.11 ready for test

2013-03-05 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/5 Johannes Geppert joh...@gmail.com: I don't think it is a showstopper. This can also be fixed in one of the next releases. Yes, I know that but from other side, this bug was introduced during development of 2.3.11 and we know it and it's already solved in trunk. So, I think I will