Struts 2.5 and Java 7

2015-05-29 Thread David
I noticed in the conversation thread on log4j2 that posters mentioned that Struts 2.5 will "switch to JDK 7". Does this mean that Struts 2.5 will not work with Java 6? Will security fixes still be created/made for the Struts 2.3 series? -- View this message in context: http://struts.1045723.n5.

Re: Log4j2 doesn't work with Google AppEngine

2015-05-29 Thread Lukasz Lenart
Nope, it didn't help 2015-05-29 12:25 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart : > 2015-05-29 11:34 GMT+02:00 Johannes Geppert : >> According to Stackoverflow [1] you need to disable > name="log4j2.disable.jmx" value="true" /> in appengine-web.xml. >> Also it should be already solved in log4j2 beta. >> >> [1] >> h

Re: Log4j2 doesn't work with Google AppEngine

2015-05-29 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2015-05-29 11:34 GMT+02:00 Johannes Geppert : > According to Stackoverflow [1] you need to disable name="log4j2.disable.jmx" value="true" /> in appengine-web.xml. > Also it should be already solved in log4j2 beta. > > [1] > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16979283/problems-with-using-log4j-2-in

Re: Log4j2 doesn't work with Google AppEngine

2015-05-29 Thread Johannes Geppert
According to Stackoverflow [1] you need to disable in appengine-web.xml. Also it should be already solved in log4j2 beta. [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16979283/problems-with-using-log4j-2-in-gae # web: http://www.jgeppert.com twitter: htt

Re: Log42j

2015-05-29 Thread Johannes Geppert
Yes the old implementation is just marked as deprecated so no third party plugins should crash. Users could just use the log4j(1) bridge it's also usefully if you use other third party components. http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/log4j-1.2-api/index.html Indeed the Google App Engine problem is

Re: Log42j

2015-05-29 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2015-05-29 8:59 GMT+02:00 Johannes Geppert : > I would not say that this change is to big for this release. > I mean we drop 4 plugins and change to JDK7. > So adding a new dependency is not such a big change. > And with log4j2 the users can simply add a bridge. > So the migration path is not so ha

Re: Log42j

2015-05-29 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2015-05-29 8:59 GMT+02:00 Johannes Geppert : > I would not say that this change is to big for this release. > I mean we drop 4 plugins and change to JDK7. > So adding a new dependency is not such a big change. > And with log4j2 the users can simply add a bridge. > So the migration path is not so ha

Re: Log42j

2015-05-29 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2015-05-29 9:12 GMT+02:00 Christoph Nenning : > Log4j2 wants to provide the same benefits as slf4j does. AFAIK slf4j is a > one man show while log4j2 has a bigger team and is backed by the ASF. SLF4J and Log4j2 are comparable for me, but the other is from ASF which is advantage over SLF4J :) Reg

Re: Log42j

2015-05-29 Thread Christoph Nenning
> >> > >> As long as you’re making changes to logging, have you given > consideration to making SLF4J the standard facade in Struts? That > would allow making Log4j2 the preferred implementation without > impacting anyone who wanted to stick with Log4j “classic”. > > > > That's the idea behind

Re: Log42j

2015-05-29 Thread Joseph Walton
> On 29 May 2015, at 4:39 pm, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > 2015-05-29 8:20 GMT+02:00 Joseph Walton : >> >> As long as you’re making changes to logging, have you given consideration to >> making SLF4J the standard facade in Struts? That would allow making Log4j2 >> the preferred implementation wit

Re: Log42j

2015-05-29 Thread Christoph Nenning
> > > >> On 29 May 2015, at 3:55 pm, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > ... > >> My assumption was that we do this in Struts 3 - drop other layers and > >> use Log4j2 as a main layer. > >> > >> What do you think about that? > > > > As long as you’re making changes to logging, have you given > consideratio