I'm with you. I don't like using substitute html tags. They never take into
account that tags now a days can have expando properties that become part of
the html DOM.
Bryan LaPlante
-- Original Message ---
From: Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts
be replaced with your ajax call necessary to process the
event. Is this your implementation? Do you have a discussion form for it?
Bryan LaPlante
-- Original Message ---
From: "Frank W. Zammetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Cc: &quo
ActionClass that will allow you
to integrate Struts into the next version of xoscript (xml scripting objects),
but it is not ready yet.
Bryan LaPlante
-- Original Message ---
From: "Frank W. Zammetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@struts.apache.org
Cc: dev@struts.apache.o
the request
reader somehow altered when using a form?
Bryan LaPlante
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r jsp page. Here is the tag ref for that.
http://struts.apache.org/struts-taglib/tagreference-struts-html.html
Bryan LaPlante
-- Original Message ---
From: shiiva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:21:18 CST
Subject: Passing Parameters to Ac
sDebugEnabled()) {
log.debug(e1);
}
}
}finally{
XOServiceFactory.destroy();
}
return forward;
}
}
Bryan LaPlante
------ Original Message ---
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lic Object getProperty(Object key){
return properties.get(key);
}
}
Bryan LaPlante
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on that a while
and see what I come up with. I appreciate the collaboration, you are an easy
architect to understand.
Bryan
-- Original Message ---
From: "Frank W. Zammetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Cc: "Struts Developers List&qu
don't like that way that implies a re-write of an
existing application.
Thoughts?
Bryan LaPlante
-- Original Message ---
From: "Frank W. Zammetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Cc: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Wed
write it to the appropriate xml structure and hand it back to the client
javascript that called the method.
I guess I should ask if I am understanding your solution or am I off base.
Bryan LaPlante
-- Original Message ---
From: "Frank W. Zammetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a 1.2 Mega, senza canone e costi di attivazione.
Abbonati subito su http://www.libero.it
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I agree that we should throw the exception. IMO, it should fail fast and
> > loud at startup if you've misconfigured the validations.
>
> I know this change has been checked in alr
> -Original Message-
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'll have a look a doing a patch. I'm probably being really stupid but how
> do you mean group by powers of 2? You mean 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 etc. -
Yes 1<<0 1<<1,1<
ter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 1, 2004 10:06 PM
> To: 'Struts Developers List'
> Subject: Re: URL validation
>
> If we're talking URLs aren't we looking at the wrong RFC? RFC1738 has
> this section:
>
> 3.3. HTTP
>
>
Something like:
> > >
> > >
> > > allow2slashes
> > > true
> > >
> > > nofragments
> > > true
> > >
> > > allowallschemes
> > > false
> &g
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 1, 2004 03:41 PM
> To: 'Struts Developers List'
> Subject: Re: URL validation
>
> On 03/15/2004 10:16 AM Adam Hardy wrote:
> > On 03/13/2004 07:46 AM [EMAIL PR
18 matches
Mail list logo
