--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CTO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Rosenholmveien 25 | know how to do a thing and to watch |
1414 Trollåsen | som
on where to go from here?
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CTO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Rosenholmveien 25 | know how to do a thing and to watch
On Tuesday 16. March 2010 11.04.29 Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> I made a new release of OGNL 3.0, right now I'm trying to push it into
> central repo?
Can you post a link to changes in 3.0?
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Deve
On Thursday 10. December 2009 20.28.48 Musachy Barroso wrote:
> guys, can you start a different thread for this? :)
You have a point there, talk about hijacking a thread:-)
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer /
or ctrl+clicks a link" is "Doctor it hurts when I
do this (bangs fist against head)", which means; Dont do that.
So the bottom line is - yes I agree that the functionality of
conversation-scope is important, but it's not necessarily that hard to
implement. I e
of a wizard expire requires more work, but
should not be magic either. You can f.ex. schedule a Quartz-job using Spring to
run every x minute and reap expired wizard-instances which then must register
themselves, a static in-memory map should be sufficient, when created.
--
Andreas Joseph Kro
t it would be nice to have, but not a must. Most
implementations I've seen of "conversation"-scope are rather messy and don't
provide anything beyond what you can achieve with
ScopedModelDriver(scope=session) and some custom-code. I've built several,
robust, wizard-like
llows the specification of multiple escape
> mechanisms including an ordering in which they'll be applied.
+1
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CTO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most dif
against multiple returns)
>
>
> But.. What if you for some reason wants to escape both javascript and xml..
> (would you ever?)
Yes, at leas I would. I sometimes end up having to embed HTML/XML in either
JS-variables or as URLEncoded in an HTML-attribute, so escaping multiple t
set back on the mapping unless there exist some extra
parameters (handled in the if-block in line 183).
I fail to see how this has ever worked...
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CTO
+-+
OfficeNet AS
On Saturday 19 September 2009 09:41:06 am Rainer Hermanns wrote:
> Hi,
>
> finally done, XWork 2.1.6 is on its way to the mirrors and should
> be available soon...
You're the man!
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Softwar
Hi all.
How is that xwork-2.1.6 release doing?
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CTO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Rosenholmveien 25 | know how to do a
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 09:14:04 pm Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 September 2009 05:13:10 pm Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> > For me, the build wasn't failing, it was hanging... The problem was a
> > backslash instead of file.separator (or whatever
te a patch, that'd be great!
> Otherwise, you can comment out embeddedjsp from the modules section of
> the plugins' directory pom.xml file and skip it.
Ok, I'll put on my patch hat and have a look...
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CTO
ime Environment (build 1.6.0_16-b01)
Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 14.2-b01, mixed mode)
$ uname -a
Linux andreak-laptop 2.6.28-15-generic #48-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 29 08:54:56 UTC
2009 i686 GNU/Linux
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior So
kipped: 0
Anyone looking into this?
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CTO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Rosenholmveien 25 | know how to do a thing and
På tirsdag 25. august 2009 kl 18:23:04 skrev du:
> is Struts still pointing to xwork 2.1.5-SNAPSHOT? That might be a
> problem because the xwork version was already bumped to
> 2.1.6-SNAPSHOT.
Struts' trunk definitely points to 2.1.6-SNAPSHOT and has been for a while.
--
Andrea
to xwork 2.1.6, I'd also like to get struts-master
> released so that we aren't sitting on changes up there as well.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CTO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The m
I know I'm nagging...
Now how about that 2.1.8-GA?
Any issues left to be resolved or are we waiting for the xwork-2.1.6 "again"?
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CTO
+-+
OfficeNet AS
ere
wasn't any 2.1.8-SNAPSHOT there... It also applies to 2.1.7...
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CTO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Rosenholmveien 25 | kno
g it, hopefully this will make it in the 2.1.8-GA.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CTO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Rosenholmveien 25 | know how to do
What's keeping it from being released?
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CTO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Rosenholmveien 25 | know how to do a thing a
On Tuesday 30 June 2009 04:47:22 pm Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Andreas Joseph
> > Krogh wrote:
> >> was maybe a little too precise in pointing out 2.1.8, but what I'd like to
On Tuesday 30 June 2009 03:09:08 pm Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Andreas Joseph
> Krogh wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 June 2009 03:14:00 am Musachy Barroso wrote:
> >> 2.7 has been out for a while, so it should not be *that* risky, but I
> >>
cluding 2.7.x in 2.1.8, even if it means delaying the release some to allow
testing.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CTO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Rosenholmveien
On Sunday 24 May 2009 09:36:48 pm Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> Hi all.
> Normally this kind of post would be better posted to -users, but I'm looking
> for the developers comments on this.
>
> Anyone have any experience using Scala with Struts2? I'm especially thinki
could use, refactoring out the call to
"MakeIterator.convert(findValue(value))" to a factory of some kind which
checked some kind of registry for providing a proper Iterator for the
Scala-object returned by findValue(value).
Comments?
--
Andreas Josep
t that this is
possible asking Mr. Google. Maybe mentioning it in the "wildcard
mapping"-section would be a good place?
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CEO
+-+
OfficeNet AS|
ot;user_*", method = "{1}")
public class UserAction
Anyway, the class-based @Action(s)-annotations seem to work as expected, good
work and thanks for listening:-)
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CEO
+--
now found some time to test it and it appears it's not working the same
way as actions defined in struts.xml with respect to wildcard-patterns.
For example, say you have the following in struts.xml:
How do I accomplish the same thing using annotations?
--
Andreas Jos
musachy
Very cool!
I'm building right now, will let you know the results
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CEO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Rosenholmveie
ons
as one can using XML, which today you can't.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CEO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Rosenholmveien 25 | know ho
On Sunday 26 April 2009 10:57:59 pm Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> On Sunday 26 April 2009 04:53:23 pm Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 April 2009 10:48:33 pm Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> > > On Sunday 26 April 2009 04:43:42 pm Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> > > > On
On Sunday 26 April 2009 10:48:33 pm Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> On Sunday 26 April 2009 04:43:42 pm Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 April 2009 10:32:43 pm Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> > > On Sunday 26 April 2009 04:27:28 pm Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> > > > On
On Sunday 26 April 2009 10:32:43 pm Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> On Sunday 26 April 2009 04:27:28 pm Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 April 2009 10:10:29 pm Musachy Barroso wrote:
> > > But you always map a url to a method, an action is not executed, a
> > > m
pings just like the "action"-element in struts.xml does,
like:
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CEO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Rosenholmveien 25 | k
ue for calling
MyAction.nex() for example) not part of the URI itself.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CEO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Rosenholmveien 25 | k
e main reasons I still map my actions in
struts.xml.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CEO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Rosenholmveien 25 | know how to d
On Sunday 26 April 2009 08:29:57 pm Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> On Sunday 26 April 2009 02:22:50 pm Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> > Hi.
> > I see that https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2394 is closed with
> > resolution=implemented with a comment referring to the
want to map it as /mynamespace/showuser *and*
/mynamespace/anotheralias for some reason, how is this possible using the
Convention-plugin as the @Action-annotation is not applicable to classes?
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer
Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CEO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Rosenholmveien 25 | know how to do a thing and to watch |
1414 Trollåsen | somebody
eck for exclusion *after* the action-context is created
on purpose. The point is that I don't want Struts to try to auto-map an action
based on the excluded URI, and possibly fail, but I *do* want to be able to use
a
On Saturday 28 February 2009 00:11:21 Dave Newton wrote:
> Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> > On Friday 27 February 2009 15:04:52 Musachy Barroso wrote:
> >> Hi Andreas, attaching the patch to a jira ticket is the way to go to
> >> make sure we don't forget about
figured out how to use a property
configured in struts.xml or struts.properties. So no init-params in
servlet-filter-config necessary anymore.
Please consider it for the next release or at least give feedback on what you
don't like about it.
Anyway; Comments are welcome.
--
Andreas Jose
original plan was to be able to configure this by setting a property
specifying the pattern(s) in struts.properties or struts.xml, but nobody
proposed a solution for how I could use those properties from the
servlet-filters when I asked...
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CEO
ly i think exclusion would be a usefull feature
Good:-)
I see quite a lot of other improvements struts2 could benefit from, especially
the taglibs, and will post a list soon of things me and my company would like
to implement.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senio
ne* place (struts.xml or struts.properties) instead
of scattered around.
So, again: Is there a mechanism in place for accessing these properties in a
uniform way from "everywhere"?
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Softw
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 22:27:25 Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> Hi all.
> I would like to extend the struts2 servlet-filters with a config-option
> telling it URI-patterns to exclude. My thoughts are to add a property:
>
> struts.action.url_exclude_pattern=/lang/.*,/pages/.
27;ll have to
maintain my own implementations of the servlet-filters.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CEO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Rosenholmveien 25 | know
your needs and give back... I think you'll find many
people being quite grateful to you for your efforts.
Frank
Struts-2.1 with AjaxAnywhere fits my needs very well:-)
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CEO
+---
the web
(http://struts.apache.org/2.1.6/index.html). Built-in AJAX-support (first-class
AJAX support) is one of the things Struts2 announces as a main-feature, and
with the dojo-plugin going away this isn't true any more.
This means Struts-2.1 no longer has any decent ui-tags?
--
Andreas Joseph Kro
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 23:49:51 Dave Newton wrote:
> --- On Tue, 12/16/08, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> > Anyone else needing this, or am I in some kind of
> > joda-cult here in Norway?
>
> I've used it, but all the places I've consulted at use java.util.Date
What really confused me was that this issue has status "Resolved" and really
isn't resolved at all. The attached files are not in trunk. A comment saying
something like "This could be used to write a plugin as we don't want to
introduce an external dependency to joda-time&q
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 23:30:59 Martin Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh
> wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 16 December 2008 23:14:50 Musachy Barroso wrote:
> > > It doesn't mean that it will convert from string to a joda object, it
>
time.
I know this sounds kind of rant-ish, but there are so many good things about
Struts2 that missing out-of-the-box joda-support is kind of hard to swallow...
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CEO
+-+
Office
d to work? I thought so, reading this:
The comment in WW-2476 saying that "This was resolved as part of XW-473", what
does it actually mean?
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CEO
+-+
OfficeNet AS
arately.
Yeah. Last week I commented out the offending code as I just wanted to get the
up to speed with struts-2.1 from trunk, but now I see that I cannot make that
"short-cut" anymore. It works now after building and installing xwork2 from
trunk.
Sorry for the noise.
--
Andreas
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 21:44:04 Musachy Barroso wrote:
> You need to build xwork, or do a:
>
> mvn -P xwork install
>
> assuming the xwork is in ../xwork relative to the main pom.xml
Thanks.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software
n: package com.opensymphony.xwork2
...
I'm no maven expert, but I thought it was supposed to manage the dependancy of
the new xwork for me. How do make it download and use the new xwork so that it
compiles?
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software
ut it won't be tomorrow:-)
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CEO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Karenslyst Allé 11 | know how to do a thing and to watch
On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:46:14 Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:40:51 Ronny Løvtangen wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 11, 2008, at 11:21 PM, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik wrote:
> >
> > > As mentioned, I realized that just _after_ pressing th
> For those that aren't, take a look at the original explanation of
> nested tags in Struts 1 from Aaron Bates:
> http://www.keyboardmonkey.com/next/Primer_partOne.jsp?content=yesplease
The "What if..." in part-2 is especially relevant.
-
ment where the above would be a relevant solution to
anything. Documenting this limitations whold be OK I think.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CEO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most difficult thing
On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:31:59 Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:26:02 Musachy Barroso wrote:
> > The problem with your suggestion is that it works for simple, and
> > specific cases, but given OGNL "power", there is a large way of case
gt;
>
>
> what would the name be in that case?
That's a more complex one, for which I don't have an answer at the moment. But
the IteratorComponent must be able to somehow find out which index this
actually results in, ant stuff that into the piggy-banking neste
On Thursday 11 December 2008 23:21:23 Dave Newton wrote:
> What is this, some sort of Norwegian revolt?
You're on!
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CEO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most difficu
ffort (se how Struts-1.1 does it) to avoid the messy stuff you're
suggesting above.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CEO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Karenslyst Al
ribute for the input-tag. Something like this in
evaluateParams():
if (this.name != null) {
name = findString(this.name);
addParameter("name",
NestedContextHelper.computeNesting(stack)+findString(na
And I propose changing it so that you can write this insted:
Person Data
Notice how the "person." part is missing from the input-tags.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CEO
+-
; Wouldn't to the trick?
Yes, ofcourse, but that's exactly what I'm trying to avoid. The point is when
you're creating advanced GUIs you don't always know that "full path", so making
it possible to include a JSP (jsp:include) for rendering some input-values
afte
de regardless of the object-hierarchy the object resides
in".
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CEO
+-+
OfficeNet AS| The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Karenslyst Allé 11 | know
Anyone?
I really would like to see this included sooner than later and would appreciate
any feedback.
On Thursday 11 December 2008 13:18:20 Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> Hi all!
> One of the most usefull things about (2.0 < Struts >= 1.1) is the
> nested-tag-library. It a
/struts2/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/components/Property.java:[164,27]
cannot find symbol
symbol : method escapeJavaScript(java.lang.String)
location: class com.opensymphony.xwork2.util.TextUtils
Is anyone looking into this?
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Senior Software Developer / CEO
I believe this is quite simple to implement given that the valuestack is always
available and contains everything we need.
Is anyone working on this? Will the community accept such a patch and apply it
to mainstream?
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh <[EMAIL PROT
74 matches
Mail list logo
