Hello. The 6.2.0 test build showcase applications appeared to work fine when
tested with Java 8/Tomcat 8.5. Based on that, my vote is:
[X] General Availability (GA)
+1 (b)
Regards.
On 2023/07/05 10:25:38 Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> The Apache Struts 6.2.0 test build is available. With this releas
Appreciation goes out to everyone who contributed to the 6.0.0 release !
Since I have only tested 6.0 via the Showcase applications (it worked well for
both), I will abstain my vote for now: +0.
One item to mention: I noticed that the 6.0.0 standalone artifacts seem to
have md5 and sha1 hashfi
Hi.
Quickly checked the 2.5.28.3 showcase applications, no issues seen.
[ x ] General Availability (GA). +1 (binding)
Regards,
James.
p.s. For some reason it appears that I did not receive the original vote email
from the dev list, only the "reply" emails when others repli
Hi Lukasz and Greg.
I think the change to escape the tag body HTML by default may have been a
"defensive stance" for the tags ? Changing the default escaping behaviour to
false might be better for some use cases, though.
Maybe the tag body escaping behaviour should still be true by d
Hi Lukasz.
Thanks for putting together the initial 6.0.0-RC1 test build.
So far I only had a chance to try a quick run-through of the Showcase
applications for the test build.
The main Showcase application seemed to work OK for the test build, with no
obvious failures.
The REST Showcase appli
Hi Lukasz.
Thanks for putting together the 2.5.28 test build.
The Showcase applications (normal and REST) appear to work fine with the
2.5.28 standalone artifacts, when run on Tomcat 8.5 with Java 7.
No issues were seen when adding the labelposition, labelPosition, or both
prop
Hi Lukasz.
I have no objections to marking that list of plugins as deprecated in 2.6.x.
There has not been much development activity for most of those plugins in a
while, from a quick review.
Also, marking them as deprecated might get the attention of anyone using those
plugins actively ... s
Hi Lukasz and Greg.
Thanks for looking into the behaviour, Lukasz.
And thanks, Greg, for indicating you did not see any similar warnings when
running your application on Tomcat with 2.5.27.
I noticed those log warn outputs when running the 2.5.27 Showcase on Tomcat
8.5.x, so if there is some s
Hi Lukasz and Greg.
Thanks for looking into the behaviour, Lukasz.
And thanks, Greg, for indicating you did not see any similar warnings when
running your application on Tomcat with 2.5.27.
I noticed those log warn outputs when running the 2.5.27 Showcase on Tomcat
8.5.x, so if there is some s
Hi Lukasz.
Using the 2.5.27 test build zip artifacts, I tried out the Showcase
application. I did not notice any issues with the 2.5.27 Showcase
interactively, as things seemed to work OK (similar to previous releases).
However, looking at the console logs when running it, there were
Hi Łukasz.
Thanks for putting the list together for 2.5.27 changes. Beyond what has
already been discussed in other replies, the only other potential for 2.5.27
that I noticed was WW 5129 / PR 495.
It looks like PR 495 still has changes requested/discussion going on, so I am
thinking it proba
Hi.
+1 (b)
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ X ] General Availability (GA)
Regards,
James.
On 2020/12/02 19:18:36, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> The Apache Struts 2.5.26 test build is available. With this release
> the following issues were addressed:
>
> Bug
> [WW-5095] - Junit p
Hi.
This discussion thread has some interesting information and points raised
(thanks to Greg, Lukasz and Yasser). :)
If the old logic discussed in the thread is replaced, it might be a good idea
to try out some older and newer Tomcat versions (e.g. 7.x, 8.x, 9.x), to see if
things still beha
:35, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> pon., 23 lis 2020 o 04:40 James Chaplin napisał(a):
> >
> > Hi Łukasz.
> >
> > Thanks for your work on, and putting together, the 2.5.26 test build.
> >
> > I downloaded the Struts 2.5.26 test build and ran the Struts
Hi Łukasz.
Thanks for your work on, and putting together, the 2.5.26 test build.
I downloaded the Struts 2.5.26 test build and ran the Struts Showcase and
Struts Rest Showcase applications locally. All the interaction for both
applications seemed to work fine with the 2.5.26 test bui
Hello.
[x] General Availability (GA) +1
Regards,
James.
On 2020/09/24 05:07:49, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> The Apache Struts 2.5.25 test build is available. With this release
> the following issues were addressed:
>
> Bug
> [WW-5002] - Package Level Properties in Global Results
> [WW-5065] - A
Hello Greg.
Those log warnings are due to WW-5077 changes (2020/05/24), which are more
detailed (and at warn-level) when devMode is true. When devMode is false, it
reverts to the old behaviour of a shorter debug-level-only output.
There is a (fairly old) unit test which indicates "struts.token
Hello Łukasz.
Thanks for putting together the new 2.5.25 test build. It looks like the
date/time stamp fix is still working for the .zip packaging, too.
I tried out the 2.5.25 test build by running both Showcase applications on
JDK 7 / Tomcat 8.5. The build seems to be working prop
Hello Everyone (and Greg, Lukasz and Yasser more specifically).
There are probably differing opinions on what constitutes "best practice"
for properties/resource bundles and Struts 2, but as long as the set-up you use
for your application functions effectively for you, it is probably OK. I
Hello Lukasz and Markus.
Thanks Lukasz, for the latest build. :)
The 2.5.24 test build seems OK to me.
The date/time values for the contents of the .zip appear normal (so the fix for
the build issue of 2.5.23 seems to still be working). I also did a quick
run-through of both 2.5.24 Showcase
Hi. My "vote" would also be to preserve XML configuration support for Struts
in the future.
Keeping XML configuration as an option, even if a future annotations-based
configuration mechanism is introduced, would keep things flexible (and probably
make upgrades from older versions less painful)
Hello Łukasz (and Struts Dev Team).
Sorry for the long response (I was trying to be thorough). :)
I checked out tag STRUTS_2_5_23 and built it locally with JDK7, as you
suggested. It produced the same January 5 2020 modification timestamps inside
all the zip files produced by the as
.
On 2020/07/06 06:10:21, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> pon., 6 lip 2020 o 05:13 James Chaplin napisał(a):
> >
> > Hello Łukasz.
> >
> > I started to run through the showcase applications for the 2.5.23 test
> > build, when I noticed something weird in the &qu
Hello Łukasz.
Creating new Maven projects using each of the 2.5.22 Struts Maven
Archetypes worked for me, and the created projects all built successfully.
Based on that, my vote is:
+1 [ x ] General Availability (GA)
Regards,
James.
On 2020/07/02 05:31:16, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
Hello Łukasz.
I started to run through the showcase applications for the 2.5.23 test
build, when I noticed something weird in the "struts-2.5.23-all.zip" content
timestamps. All of the files/directories within the .zip file seem to have a
date/time of "Modified: 2020-01-05 17:24:32 ET" (
?
Regards,
James.
On 2020/05/16 04:23:13, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> Thanks James!
>
> I think me & you addressed all the problems and we can release the
> archetypes, any thoughts?
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Łukasz
> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
>
Hello Lukasz.
I tried to test out the 2.5.21-SNAPSHOT version of the struts2-archetypes,
to provide some feedback.
I used NetBeans 11 and JDK11 to test the struts2-archetype-x items, with
"Version: 2.5.21-SNAPSHOT". Here are the results:
- Starter, Plugin, DBPortlet, Convention, Bl
27 matches
Mail list logo
