Reinhard Nägele wrote:
I set up the following expression for a validwhen validation rule, which
produces the exception below:
Inserting parentheses that should not be necessary solves the issue:
I do actually consider this a bug. Should I enter one into the bug
database?
I'm using Struts 1.2.
David Graham wrote:
--- Matt Bathje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why would a developer use different variable names? If
.classpath/.project for eclipse were included, there must be
documentation saying "you must setup VARIABLEX to point to RESOURCEX"
and so forth.
IMO, dictating
David Graham wrote:
Eclipse classpath variables don't solve the issue because each developer
may be using different variable names. Further, the name of the jar file
may be different (ie. have version number in it). In my experience,
forcing developers to use the "one true setup" is a recipe for
With eclipse at least, this limitation can be easily worked around.
Anything that uses a machine-specific path (or whatever else that may be
machine specific) is referenced to by a variable that each developer can
set on their machine. What gets committed only has references to those
variables,
Hi guys
Not sure where to send this, but I figured one of you would. On the
Jakarta FAQs page, there is a link to the Struts Kickstart FAQ that is
broken. The broken link is on this page:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/faqs.html
under the FAQs header.
Matt
---
James Mitchell wrote:
Sorry for the OT, but I figured some folks here are doing this.
I'm trying out Subclipse and getting this error:
http://cvs.apache.org/~jmitchell/server-cert-invalid.jpg
How are you getting around this?
Command line works fine for me, but I would really like to use Eclipse.
Ja
Hey all.
I was going to fix a small typo on the validation user guide page, and
can't get Eclipse/Subclipse to properly create a patch for me. Every
time I try to create the patch, the full path to my checked out version
is used in it, which seems wrong. I looked at a couple other patches in
bu
Excellent, thanks very much.
Matt
Don Brown wrote:
Yes, there is a version of viewcvs, viewsvn, for subversion:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/struts/?root=Apache-SVN
Don
Matt Bathje wrote:
Hi all.
Is there a "viewcvs.cgi" equivalent for the SVN Repository? I realize
I can open th
Hi all.
Is there a "viewcvs.cgi" equivalent for the SVN Repository? I realize I
can open the url in a browser and view the latest revision, but I liked
that you could see the history on the CVS version.
In case its not clear what I am talking about:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/trunk/
Some comments and questions inline...
Michael McGrady wrote:
Thanks for your input, Matt. There is an end to the page and a place
there for alternative viewpoints. Normally one person stops talking
before the other starts. There is also the rest of the wiki where other
pages can be placed. Y
t these new ideas without having to cover the old ones,
then don't you think that will systematically stiffle new ideas? I
don't want to write a manual as if I were working at $soft.
Michael McGrady
Matt Bathje wrote:
Maybe I shouldn't step in the middle of this...but I'
Maybe I shouldn't step in the middle of this...but I'm (stupidly?) going to.
As both of you have agreed, (and is in fact the case) a Wiki is about
the sharing of ideas and collaboration.
The problem as I see it is that you have the page set up in a manner
that cannot be changed or added to easil
it up. If people are bothered by it, then I was offering one
possible solution.
Hopefully I've made myself more clear about this.
Matt Bathje
- Original Message -
From: "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
off...)
Again, sorry if I am raising a non-issue, I just thought I would mention it.
Matt Bathje
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; Let me know if there is more problems or you know for sure how to
limit
> > > the variables it takes, see the comment
> > > in the DTD.
> > >
> >
> > Rob -
> >
> > this is a little bit broken, you need to have
> >
> > instead of
> >
>
> If you just want optional, you don't want *, you want ?, like so:
>
>
>
Oh yeah, duh...well like I said before I'm no XML guru :)
Matt Bathje
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
15 matches
Mail list logo