I'd suggest that we opened the door to using persisted objects
directly when we added Model-Driven and ParameterFilter to the
standard release. Even if we had a unamious agreement to remove
Model-Driven support across the board, we'd have to go through a long
deprecate/remove cycle. In the meantime
Martin Gilday wrote:
I would agree with that slightly. However with Struts 2 it is often
conveinient to have fields which are simply your Hibernate domain
models, especially if you are following paramsPrepareParams. You might
have a form allowing them to change their name but not their signup
t;
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:53:15 -0600
Subject: Re: [S2] Annotations (was Plugins gone wild!)
I tried to send a reply early, but it got rejected because it was HTML
(oops).
I'm wondering if this is just another layer of configuration to
alleviate flawed designs. I always find that the
e a
field named 'one'. A quick way around this might be to simply trim the
parameter name to the first '.'
- Original message -
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:52:16 -0400
Subj
Developers List"
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:52:16 -0400
Subject: Re: [S2] Annotations (was Plugins gone wild!)
On 10/23/07, Martin Gilday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well I am looking at the Parameter Filter Interceptor
> (http://cwiki.apache.org/WW/parameter-filter-interceptor.h
On 10/23/07, Martin Gilday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well I am looking at the Parameter Filter Interceptor
> (http://cwiki.apache.org/WW/parameter-filter-interceptor.html) which I
> am proposing we complement by allowing the same thing with annotations.
> Currently we have a wizard like section
On 10/23/07, Martin Gilday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where abouts is the annotations plugin housed? I could not see it in
> the struts2 trunk or sandbox trunk. Following Don's comment in this
> https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2264 I was interested in
> trying to created this feature
