Re: [VOTE] Promote Struts 1.3.5 to General Availability

2006-09-18 Thread Ted Husted
On 9/17/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Therefore, Struts 1.3.5 is officially our first GA release in the 1.3 series. Thanks for pushing this out. Wendy, It's great to see that 1.3.5 has finally hit the street. In about 12 hours, I'll crack open a cold one in your name. :) -Ted. -

Re: [VOTE] Promote Struts 1.3.5 to General Availability

2006-09-17 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 9/13/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease135 Please respond with a vote on GA quality for Struts 1.3.5 [ ] +1Yes, Struts 1.3.5 should be promoted to GA quality. [ ] +/- 0 [ ] -1 No, let it remain Beta quality Vote Results:

Re: [VOTE] Promote Struts 1.3.5 to General Availability

2006-09-14 Thread Michael Jouravlev
On 9/13/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please respond with a vote on GA quality for Struts 1.3.5 [X] +1Yes, Struts 1.3.5 should be promoted to GA quality. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additi

Re: [VOTE] Promote Struts 1.3.5 to General Availability

2006-09-14 Thread Paul Benedict
Please respond with a vote on GA quality for Struts 1.3.5 [ x ] +1Yes, Struts 1.3.5 should be promoted to GA quality. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Promote Struts 1.3.5 to General Availability

2006-09-14 Thread Erik Bertelsen
Please respond with a vote on GA quality for Struts 1.3.5 [ x ] +1Yes, Struts 1.3.5 should be promoted to GA quality. - Erik

Re: [VOTE] Promote Struts 1.3.5 to General Availability

2006-09-14 Thread Laurie Harper
Wendy Smoak wrote: [X ] +1Yes, Struts 1.3.5 should be promoted to GA quality. [ ] +/- 0 [ ] -1 No, let it remain Beta quality - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

Re: [VOTE] Promote Struts 1.3.5 to General Availability

2006-09-14 Thread Don Brown
+1 On 9/14/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Please respond with a vote on GA quality for Struts 1.3.5 > >[X ] +1Yes, Struts 1.3.5 should be promoted to GA quality. >[ ] +/- 0 >[ ] -1 No, let it remain Beta quality -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska

Re: [VOTE] Promote Struts 1.3.5 to General Availability

2006-09-14 Thread Joe Germuska
Please respond with a vote on GA quality for Struts 1.3.5 [X ] +1Yes, Struts 1.3.5 should be promoted to GA quality. [ ] +/- 0 [ ] -1 No, let it remain Beta quality -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be o

Re: [VOTE] Promote Struts 1.3.5 to General Availability

2006-09-14 Thread James Mitchell
+1 for GA -- James Mitchell 678.910.8017 On Sep 14, 2006, at 2:54 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: Now that Struts 1.3.5 has been available as a Beta release [1] for almost a month, I think it's time to consider promoting it to GA quality. As I mentioned in a status report [2], we've seen reports o

RE: [VOTE] Promote Struts 1.3.5 to General Availability

2006-09-14 Thread James Holmes
+1 -Original Message- From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 1:54 AM To: Struts Developers List Subject: [VOTE] Promote Struts 1.3.5 to General Availability Now that Struts 1.3.5 has been available as a Beta release [1] for almost a month, I think

Re: [VOTE] Promote Struts 1.3.5 to General Availability

2006-09-13 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 9/13/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please respond with a vote on GA quality for Struts 1.3.5 [X] +1Yes, Struts 1.3.5 should be promoted to GA quality. [ ] +/- 0 [ ] -1 No, let it remain Beta quality -- Wendy ---

[VOTE] Promote Struts 1.3.5 to General Availability

2006-09-13 Thread Wendy Smoak
Now that Struts 1.3.5 has been available as a Beta release [1] for almost a month, I think it's time to consider promoting it to GA quality. As I mentioned in a status report [2], we've seen reports of apps being upgraded to 1.3.5 with no problems, some questions on the user list, and some update