Re: What binds us (Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality)

2004-12-05 Thread Niall Pemberton
AIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 7:06 PM Subject: Re: What binds us (Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality) > Good stuff :-) Thanks Ted and Niall for the clarification. My apologies, > again, if I came off as being o

Re: What binds us (Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality)

2004-12-05 Thread Eddie Bush
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 12:08 PM Subject: What binds us (Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality) As always, everyone is invited to vote on everything. :) The website is still a little out of synch w

What binds us (Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality)

2004-12-05 Thread Ted Husted
n the future ;-) > > Y'all have fun.  I've got to make a road trip this weekend :-(  No > rest for the wicked! > > Night, > > Eddie > > - Original Message - > From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Eddie Bush" <

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality

2004-12-03 Thread Niall Pemberton
ot;Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 6:51 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality > My own vote... > > Beta. While a number of issues have been reported, my opinion is that > #32490 is enough to preclude GA, since I believe we n

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality

2004-12-03 Thread Niall Pemberton
e Bush" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 3:57 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality > I don't see a difference, Martin. > >

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality

2004-12-03 Thread Eddie Bush
AIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 9:31 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality You're quoting from the Jakarta decision making page. We're not at Jakarta any more, and have our own process now. You have som

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality

2004-12-03 Thread Martin Cooper
> > > - Original Message - > From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 12:49 AM > Subject: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality > > > The Struts 1.2.6 t

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality

2004-12-03 Thread Eddie Bush
st" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 12:49 AM Subject: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality The Struts 1.2.6 test build has been available for about two weeks now. Once you have had a chance to form an opinion on the quality of this build, please respond to the following vote.

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality

2004-12-03 Thread Joe Germuska
At 10:51 PM -0800 12/2/04, Martin Cooper wrote: My own vote... Beta. While a number of issues have been reported, my opinion is that #32490 is enough to preclude GA, since I believe we need to have the tag libraries in sync for a GA release. I agree: Beta. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PRO

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality

2004-12-02 Thread Martin Cooper
My own vote... Beta. While a number of issues have been reported, my opinion is that #32490 is enough to preclude GA, since I believe we need to have the tag libraries in sync for a GA release. -- Martin Cooper On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 22:49:35 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The St

[VOTE] Struts 1.2.6 Quality

2004-12-02 Thread Martin Cooper
The Struts 1.2.6 test build has been available for about two weeks now. Once you have had a chance to form an opinion on the quality of this build, please respond to the following vote. - Based on its quality, the Struts 1.2.6 build should be classified as: [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] General Avai