0 - Won't have a chance to look at it for another few weeks.
/Ian
Ted Husted wrote:
The Stuts 2.0.1 distribution has been available for over a week. We
have a dependency on XWork 2.0.0 beta 1, and it would not be
appropriate to mark the Core (and consequently any of the Plugins)
"General Avai
I'll see if it's possible to submit the distribution for mirroring
tonight. In the meantime, I popped the Struts 2.0.1 library JARS and
application WARs up onto Sourceforge, so that they would at least be
available someplace.
* https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=49385&package_
Ted,
see comments inline...
> Meanwhile, are we close to a stable XWork 2 release? I believe a
> stable XWork 2 is the only thing keeping us form a a GA Struts 2
> release.
XWork 2 quality is a matter of our discussion. AFAIK no one else is using
xwork 2 as a dependency right now.
So the version c
+1
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Oct 23, 2006, at 8:21 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
Late last week there were issues with Minotaur's RAID. It survived the
move to Portland, but I don't know if it's back up to snuff yet.
It's only our first S2 beta, but should we submit 2.0.1 for mirroring
to
On 10/23/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Late last week there were issues with Minotaur's RAID. It survived the
move to Portland, but I don't know if it's back up to snuff yet.
It's only our first S2 beta, but should we submit 2.0.1 for mirroring
to take some of the heat off Minotaur?
+1
Ted Husted wrote:
Late last week there were issues with Minotaur's RAID. It survived the
move to Portland, but I don't know if it's back up to snuff yet.
It's only our first S2 beta, but should we submit 2.0.1 for mirroring
to take some of the heat off Minotaur?
-Ted.
-
Late last week there were issues with Minotaur's RAID. It survived the
move to Portland, but I don't know if it's back up to snuff yet.
It's only our first S2 beta, but should we submit 2.0.1 for mirroring
to take some of the heat off Minotaur?
-Ted.
Sorry, I'm not being clear.
A GA tag on a distribution in the 2.0.x series will have no affect on
the new API. The API is marked optional, and work can continue, and
further distributions made in the 2.0.x series, regardless of how much
work is, or isn't, being done. We had several GA release in
Whether we finalize the API or scrap it for GA doesn't really matter to
me. What concerns me is the fact that the state it's in right now is
rather confusing to the developer.
Once I get through a few tiles and other issues I'm working with right
now, I'll be willing to dive into the API stuf
Let's see. The API is already being used to an extent, but I believe
there is remaining work to do. The 2.0.1 distribution is already in
its final form. The only question is the quality grade. Right now,
it's heading toward beta, and it will probably be stuck there since it
has a dependency on XW
The API is there, but I don't believe it is fully implemented yet.
Don
Eric Molitor wrote:
Somewhat related (but mostly not)
What parts (if any) of the new API (The bob_lee_api) will be in 2.0.1
(final)?
Cheers,
Eric
On 10/23/06, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ X ] +1 Be
Somewhat related (but mostly not)
What parts (if any) of the new API (The bob_lee_api) will be in 2.0.1 (final)?
Cheers,
Eric
On 10/23/06, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ X ] +1 Beta grade for 2.0.1 "all"
Regards,
Rene
---
[ X ] +1 Beta grade for 2.0.1 "all"
Regards,
Rene
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ted Husted wrote:
Excellent, with my +1 beta, that makes three binding and two
supporting votes.
Unless there is a rash of -1s over the next day, I'll make the user
list announcement on Monday.
Meanwhile, are we close to a stable XWork 2 release? I believe a
stable XWork 2 is the only thing ke
Excellent, with my +1 beta, that makes three binding and two supporting votes.
Unless there is a rash of -1s over the next day, I'll make the user
list announcement on Monday.
Meanwhile, are we close to a stable XWork 2 release? I believe a
stable XWork 2 is the only thing keeping us form a a GA
+1 for "beta"
-
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=46988&messageID=95481#95481
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
[ X ] +1 Beta grade for 2.0.1 "all"
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ x ] +1 Beta grade for 2.0.1 "all"
2006/10/20, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The Stuts 2.0.1 distribution has been available for over a week. We
have a dependency on XWork 2.0.0 beta 1, and it would not be
appropriate to mark the Core (and consequently any of the Plugins)
"General Availab
[ X ] +1 Beta grade for 2.0.1 "all"
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 for Beta
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Oct 20, 2006, at 7:43 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
The Stuts 2.0.1 distribution has been available for over a week. We
have a dependency on XWork 2.0.0 beta 1, and it would not be
appropriate to mark the Core (and consequently any of the Plugins)
"Gen
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> There is also an issue with the Tiles TLD's being found, but that is
> one of our new and experimental plugins.
>
> * https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1467
I'm still assuming I'm doing something wrong with that one anyway;
The Stuts 2.0.1 distribution has been available for over a week. We
have a dependency on XWork 2.0.0 beta 1, and it would not be
appropriate to mark the Core (and consequently any of the Plugins)
"General Availability", but we might at least consider an Alpha or
Beta grade.
There are no lissues l
22 matches
Mail list logo
