Re: [s2]JQuery Plugin

2008-02-27 Thread David Durham, Jr.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:22 PM, David Durham, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Or maybe the body could be the options map, which often includes > callback function. Is there a better forum for this discussion, or > is the struts-dev list the place? That doesn't make sense. Maybe something l

Re: [s2]JQuery Plugin

2008-02-27 Thread Dave Newton
--- "David Durham, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Or maybe the body could be the options map, which often includes > callback function. Is there a better forum for this discussion, or > is the struts-dev list the place? The jquery plugin project is the place. Dave -

Re: [s2]JQuery Plugin

2008-02-27 Thread David Durham, Jr.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:17 PM, David Durham, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As I worked on a client's application, however, I realized that the tags > were > > almost useless to me, as everything was so specific t

Re: [s2]JQuery Plugin

2008-02-27 Thread David Durham, Jr.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I worked on a client's application, however, I realized that the tags were > almost useless to me, as everything was so specific that it was much, much > cleaner to simply write the JavaScript. I then changed the jQuer

Re: [s2]JQuery Plugin

2008-02-27 Thread Dave Newton
--- "David Durham, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is an import of the dojo plugin, right? It's starting from the Dojo plugin, correct. > Are the differences great enough for an entirely > different model from the dojo plugin? Not for the simple use-cases; the biggest difference for the

Re: [s2]JQuery Plugin

2008-02-27 Thread David Durham, Jr.
Changing the subject: On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- "David Durham, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd definitely be interested in using a JQuery plugin for struts if it > > came out (has one already?). > > Not really; I had just barely start