Copying from a separate threadcause I thought I had deleted this
thread -- doh!
After thinking about this a little more, would it make sense to test
this under our svn so that the commit msgs are sent as usual and we
can keep an eye things. The term 'subversion shelves' comes to m
> Ideally not. It's already going to be painful to split up the core-library
> package (which now produces several JAR files) into separate modules solely
> because Maven likes one artifact per module.
>
> Shale publishes information on API stability (
> http://struts.apache.org/struts-shale/api-s
>From: James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> We should probably do this over in a test repository and make sure it
> will do what we want. Similar to what was done for MyFaces and Action1.
>
> Your thoughts?
>
+1
> --
> James Mitchell
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 19, 2006, at 10:35 PM, Sean S
We should probably do this over in a test repository and make sure it
will do what we want. Similar to what was done for MyFaces and Action1.
Your thoughts?
--
James Mitchell
On Apr 19, 2006, at 10:35 PM, Sean Schofield wrote:
I'd love to see Shale move to M2. I'll try to help with the
I'd love to see Shale move to M2. I'll try to help with the limited
Maven knowledge that I have gleaned from the MyFaces experience. I'd
recommend starting out with a proposed hierarchy and set of artifiacts
as a starting point. See if we can get the basics squared away first
before sweating the
On 4/15/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> are the apis with the other javadoc going to be in a separate module?
> This should make it easy to produce javadoc from there, and then go on
> to produce the aggregated javadoc for the others.
Ideally not. It's already going to be painful
are the apis with the other javadoc going to be in a separate module?
This should make it easy to produce javadoc from there, and then go on
to produce the aggregated javadoc for the others.
- Brett
On 4/16/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/15/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/15/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig wrote
> > I'll want to experiment with ways to get combined javadocs out of
> > these artifacts (although probably two sets ...
>
> Can we do this with custom assemblies?
Without trying it, I don't think so, because it's more than just
I'll want to experiment with ways to get combined javadocs out of
these
artifacts (although probably two sets ... I got a suggestion to
split the
APIs that are interesting to application developers from the
"internal" APIs
for those extending the framework, and would like to produce two
s
av Craig
McClanahan
Sendt: 15. april 2006 17:35
Til: Struts Developers List
Emne: Re: [shale] Maven 2 build (was Re: [action1] Which webapp dtds to
include in struts-core.jar?)
On 4/15/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4/14/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PR
On 4/15/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4/14/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Separately, I'm ready (gulp!) to start moving Shale towards Maven2, and
> it's
> > recommended soure directory organizations ... as long as you
> > have-a-clue-about-Maven gurus prom
On 4/14/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Separately, I'm ready (gulp!) to start moving Shale towards Maven2, and it's
> recommended soure directory organizations ... as long as you
> have-a-clue-about-Maven gurus promise to stand by my side and help :-).
Of course. :)
> I
> had
12 matches
Mail list logo
