Re: Chain Integration Complete

2004-12-22 Thread Ted Husted
And at workstations the world over is heard the sound of caps flipping from bottles of Guiness Stout, Sam Adams, and the occasional Molson Gold. :) -T. On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 23:30:31 -0800, Don Brown wrote: > As you may have noticed, I've completed the merge of struts-chain > with Struts core (see

Re: Chain Integration Complete

2004-12-21 Thread Joe Germuska
At 9:13 AM -0800 12/21/04, Martin Cooper wrote: On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 23:30:31 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As you may have noticed, I've completed the merge of struts-chain with Struts core (see the commit message for details). I would like to add this is meant as a step forward,

Re: Chain Integration Complete

2004-12-21 Thread Martin Cooper
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 23:30:31 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As you may have noticed, I've completed the merge of struts-chain with > Struts core (see the commit message for details). I would like to add > this is meant as a step forward, not as my ultimate vision for how > things sh

Re: Chain Integration Complete

2004-12-21 Thread Don Brown
ComposableRequestProcessor replaces RequestProcessor in Struts 1.3.x. RequestProcessor is still available and could be used by specifying the className in the controller config. Struts 1.2.6 is the latest development release and Struts 1.2.4 is the latest stable release, but all new development

Re: Chain Integration Complete

2004-12-21 Thread Sean Schofield
I'm still a little fuzzy on the roadmap for struts. Now that struts-chain is in the core, does this mean we are moving towards using struts-chain over the current RequestProcessor? If so, what version is this anticipated to happen by? Finally, what is the branch being used for right now? TIA to

Chain Integration Complete

2004-12-20 Thread Don Brown
As you may have noticed, I've completed the merge of struts-chain with Struts core (see the commit message for details). I would like to add this is meant as a step forward, not as my ultimate vision for how things should be, meaning if someone doesn't like a configuration property name or pro