Sean Schofield wrote:
JSF is really a complete application framework. It does pretty much
everything Struts does (more or less) so I think that would make it a
competitor of Struts.
Struts allways had competitors. Trubine, the one w/ a beaver logo (what
was that?). Now I can name a half a doz
I would disagree that these other technologies do not compete directly
with Struts. For now, Shale is a Struts 2.x effort but Craig has made
it clear that he is prepared to break if off from Struts if the Struts
committers won't consider moving in that direction.
JSF is really a complete applicat
Yes Sean I kind of disagree with you too. I think it's great that Struts
is diverse and I hope it gets more so.
My excuse is that I am working on JDNC a lot.
I plan to integrate w/ Struts chain ... after it's released, so I do
benefit from Joe's efforts; I just can't help him. I think it takes ti
The problem is that instead of there being just one large group
working on Struts, that same group is starting to splinter into
working on Jericho, Shale, Struts 1.3, MyFaces, etc. I know this is
something that we'd all like to avoid because none of these worthy
projects gets enough attention.
You
Joe,
A comment on your lack of feedback. It occurs to me that this is one
of the unfortunate byproducts of the Struts development effort
starting to fracture. In addition to my day job, I'm currently
working on commons-chain and myfaces (plus JSF in general). That's
about all of the time I have
At 12:10 PM -0600 1/12/05, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
Just curious, where is this specific wiki page? I couldn't find a
link to it from the main wiki page.
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsChain
--
Joe Germuska
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blog.germuska.com
"Narrow minds are weapons
Just curious, where is this specific wiki page? I couldn't find a
link to it from the main wiki page.
Michael
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:44:54 -0600, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:35 AM -0500 1/12/05, Sean Schofield wrote:
> >Joe,
> >
> >Sounds like you are moving right along with
At 10:35 AM -0500 1/12/05, Sean Schofield wrote:
Joe,
Sounds like you are moving right along with StrutsChain. I liked your
idea of moving the properties from WebActionContext into the base
ActionContext. I agree that those things would exist in any given
Struts environment. Also it would probab
Joe,
Sounds like you are moving right along with StrutsChain. I liked your
idea of moving the properties from WebActionContext into the base
ActionContext. I agree that those things would exist in any given
Struts environment. Also it would probably simplify things for the
user (they don't have
