2012/12/6 Christian Grobmeier :
> There are some minor things I found:
>
> - the develop branch needs to be used in CI. Not a big deal, but somehow we
> need to tell it the CI
Yes, you can - there is option branches to build
> - what about feature branches? Should they all go remote? When are the
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Rene Gielen wrote:
> great and comprehensive writeup. Which brings me to what is really good
> about not being the first time mover - being able to profit from other's
> experiences.
>
>
Unfortunately I have not so much more experience with GIT :-|
Well, I tried t
2012/12/6 Rene Gielen :
> For migrating current SVN repo content to Git, Infra prefers to
> completely move an existing Git mirror repo. As I see it, we should
> migrate struts2.git and arguably struts-sandbox.git and let the other
> parts reside in SVN with Git morring only.
I didn't think about
Christian,
great and comprehensive writeup. Which brings me to what is really good
about not being the first time mover - being able to profit from other's
experiences.
A nice glance into some Git-related discussions over at Incubator:
http://markmail.org/message/6f7l3fjksjeem6li
Wicket has full
This is an excellent question and part of the discussion I wanted to
start (but wasn't able to follow up so far in the last busy days)
Given that we decide for Git:
As for me, it makes absolutely no sense to have a common origin codebase
split up into two repositories. If we vote for developing S
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> 2012/12/6 Christian Grobmeier :
>> Would be glad to look at your repos on github.
>>
>> One question: are we going to fix issues in Struts 2.x on SVN or are
>> we going to have everything on GIT then?
>> In the git-brnaching-model link I see
2012/12/6 Christian Grobmeier :
> Would be glad to look at your repos on github.
>
> One question: are we going to fix issues in Struts 2.x on SVN or are
> we going to have everything on GIT then?
> In the git-brnaching-model link I see one development branch. I think
> we would need a develop2x, d
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> 2012/11/28 Dave Newton :
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/
>>
>> https://github.com/nvie/gitflow
>>
>> Yeah, I like the workflow quite a bit, although I'
2012/12/6 Lukasz Lenart :
> The idea looks pretty nice, as we don't have a Git repo yet, I'm going
> to fork struts2 on the GitHub and try to play a bit - especially with
> release process
Updated the plan with links about Git flow
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Struts+3
Regards
2012/11/28 Dave Newton :
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/
>
> https://github.com/nvie/gitflow
>
> Yeah, I like the workflow quite a bit, although I've only used it on a
> couple of smallish projects.
The idea l
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/
https://github.com/nvie/gitflow
Yeah, I like the workflow quite a bit, although I've only used it on a
couple of smallish projects.
Dave
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> 2012/11/28 Rene Gielen :
>> Moving development to the Git infrastructure ASF / Infra now provides is
>> *not* a no-brainer, and it requires a little bit more than just a few +1s :)
>>
>> Let's step back, hold breath, and dive into serious dis
2012/11/28 Rene Gielen :
> Moving development to the Git infrastructure ASF / Infra now provides is
> *not* a no-brainer, and it requires a little bit more than just a few +1s :)
>
> Let's step back, hold breath, and dive into serious discussion about
> that. I'm preparing a more detailed post, but
Folks,
I think right at this point we should fork discussion on methodology
(Git) from new features as in the rest of this thread.
Moving development to the Git infrastructure ASF / Infra now provides is
*not* a no-brainer, and it requires a little bit more than just a few +1s :)
Let's step back
14 matches
Mail list logo
