On my list is to test it with 1.1.1 (just released), and to update the
dependency information if that actually works. I'm not planning on trying to
keep up with nightly build changes in MyFaces; just the releases they test
for compatibility with the JSF TCK.
Speaking of which I need to
, Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 11/1/05, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't find my changes to the mailreader app that makes it
compatible with mailreader-dao, so I'd have to start over, which I
really don't mind doing, but what do you think about a Mailreader
2.0?
That may well
FYI - Shale Mailreader does not work with MyFaces HEAD, you have to
use 1.1.0 (or a compatible release).
What's the problem with HEAD?
James Mitchell
sean
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
I don't remember the exact reason. Plus, the latest won't be on
ibiblio, so the download-dependencies won't work, unless we point it
to where the myfaces nightlies are published.
No big deal though, it works with MyFaces 1.1.0, and I'll likely
focus future efforts on new stuff.
--
James
to the mailreader app that makes it
compatible with mailreader-dao, so I'd have to start over, which I
really don't mind doing, but what do you think about a Mailreader
2.0?
That may well be appropriate ... but one question a lot of people
ask me is
where is a Shale mailreader
I can't find my changes to the mailreader app that makes it
compatible with mailreader-dao, so I'd have to start over, which I
really don't mind doing, but what do you think about a Mailreader 2.0?
What I mean is a rewrite of the same functionality into new code that
can demo some
a Mailreader 2.0?
What I mean is a rewrite of the same functionality into new code that
can demo some of the real power of Shale. If we don't want to do
that or if we think this idea will die on the vine (like some ideas
have done in the past), I understand. I guess the big difference
(for me
On 11/1/05, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't find my changes to the mailreader app that makes it
compatible with mailreader-dao, so I'd have to start over, which I
really don't mind doing, but what do you think about a Mailreader 2.0?
That may well be appropriate ... but one
[snip]
A larger scale demo app that really showed off Shale would be very useful as
well. It wouldn't *have* to be MailReader 2.0 ... it could be something new
(after all these years :-). Such an app would need to cover enough
functionality areas to show off Dialogs and the application level
