> On my list is to test it with 1.1.1 (just released), and to update the
> dependency information if that actually works. I'm not planning on trying to
> keep up with nightly build changes in MyFaces; just the releases they test
> for compatibility with the JSF TCK.
Speaking of which I need to pub
TCK.
--
> James Mitchell
Craig
678.910.8017
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 1, 2005, at 12:37 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
>
> > On 11/1/05, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I can't find my changes to the mailreader app that makes it
>
I don't remember the exact reason. Plus, the latest won't be on
ibiblio, so the download-dependencies won't work, unless we point it
to where the myfaces nightlies are published.
No big deal though, it works with MyFaces 1.1.0, and I'll likely
focus future efforts on new stuff.
--
James
> FYI - Shale Mailreader does not work with MyFaces HEAD, you have to
> use 1.1.0 (or a compatible release).
What's the problem with HEAD?
> James Mitchell
sean
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional command
On Nov 1, 2005, at 12:37 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 11/1/05, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can't find my changes to the mailreader app that makes it
compatible with mailreader-dao, so I'd have to start over, which I
really don't mind doing, but what do you
[snip]
> A larger scale demo app that really showed off Shale would be very useful as
> well. It wouldn't *have* to be MailReader 2.0 ... it could be something new
> (after all these years :-). Such an app would need to cover enough
> functionality areas to show off Dialogs an
On 11/1/05, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I can't find my changes to the mailreader app that makes it
> compatible with mailreader-dao, so I'd have to start over, which I
> really don't mind doing, but what do you think about a Mailreader 2.0?
Tha
t mind doing, but what do you think about a Mailreader 2.0?
>
> What I mean is a rewrite of the same functionality into new code that
> can demo some of the real power of Shale. If we don't want to do
> that or if we think this idea will die on the vine (like some ideas
> have done
I can't find my changes to the mailreader app that makes it
compatible with mailreader-dao, so I'd have to start over, which I
really don't mind doing, but what do you think about a Mailreader 2.0?
What I mean is a rewrite of the same functionality into new code that
can d
