Ok, as I'm a bit lost - what's the solution then? Leave it as is or
change to something else?
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For
Duplication or do you want to start that over?
2013/9/11 rgm r...@rgm.nu:
So as not to pollute the JIRAs too much with speculation or suggestions
that haven't been thought out, I'd like to have a discussion about the
required attribute here on the list.
I propose that we revert the changes
justifies the effort
MG+1
From: lukaszlen...@apache.org
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 11:18:27 +0200
Subject: Re: Proposal: required attribute changes (related to WW-4188)
To: dev@struts.apache.org
Duplication or do you want to start that over?
2013/9/11 rgm r...@rgm.nu:
So as not to pollute
So as not to pollute the JIRAs too much with speculation or suggestions
that haven't been thought out, I'd like to have a discussion about the
required attribute here on the list.
I propose that we revert the changes made in WW-3908, namely -- turn
requiredLabel back into required. Then, to
I already updated to requiredLabel, so I vote we stick with that. :)
Besides, requiredLabel actually makes more sense, since that's all it does.
You could invert the logic you proposed so that if a required attribute is
detected with a value of anything but false, you consider that to trigger
Okay thank you for the clarification. I had changed my copy of
themes/simple/text.ftl to add the html5 attribute in the case when
required=true was set. This continues to work fine for me when I set
requiredLabel=true -- so in my case it does have an additional
(beneficial) side effect, in that
I see -- I was under the mistaken impression that requiredLabel before
2.3.12 defined -- at the field level -- which character would be used to
indicate that a field is required. Similar to how labelSeparator works.
I see now that the character used is hard-coded to an asterisk, and that
Nope, it's just the asterisk. Backend validation is handled in the action's
validate method or validation XML.
On Wednesday, September 11, 2013, struts wrote:
I see -- I was under the mistaken impression that requiredLabel before
2.3.12 defined -- at the field level -- which character would be
So as not to pollute the JIRAs too much with speculation or suggestions
that haven't been thought out, I'd like to have a discussion about the
required attribute here on the list.
I propose that we revert the changes made in WW-3908, namely -- turn
requiredLabel back into required. Then, to
