On 6/6/06, David H. DeWolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been lucky find a solution, but it took a bit of playing around. The
key problem I was having was making sure that:
1) the tests were in src/it were compiled in addition to src/test
2) the integration tests were not executed during tes
> I haven't been successful at getting Surefire to run during
> integration-test instead of test, but I have a couple of
> questions out on [EMAIL PROTECTED] looking for ideas.
I've been lucky find a solution, but it took a bit of playing around. The
key problem I was having was making sure th
On 6/5/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem I keep running into is that there is only one
/, and there is no
// in the model. If that
existed, it seems like you could get another execution of Surefire
using a second source directory.
Returning to the idea of best practices a
On 6/5/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 06/06/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maven2 needs to support integration testing as a first class notion in
the
> architecture of what you envision a "project" to be.
It may not have been clear enough, but that's exactly w
On 6/5/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's needed is a complete additional test environment, with its own
lifecycle, and its own classpath (i.e. dependencies tagged to this scope so
you only load things like HttpUnit or HtmlUnit here). If integration tests
exist, they should b
On 06/06/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maven2 needs to support integration testing as a first class notion in the
architecture of what you envision a "project" to be.
It may not have been clear enough, but that's exactly what I meant in
my last email. I thought this is what th
On 6/5/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/5/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It *should* still be possible to achieve what you want currently (I
> thought Vincent's chapter discussed that, but I don't might be
> mistaken). It may take some effort, though, and I'm not s
On 6/5/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It *should* still be possible to achieve what you want currently (I
thought Vincent's chapter discussed that, but I don't might be
mistaken). It may take some effort, though, and I'm not sure of any
existing examples. The 'integration-test' phas
It'll probably get closed as a duplicate, but thanks for the input.
It *should* still be possible to achieve what you want currently (I
thought Vincent's chapter discussed that, but I don't might be
mistaken). It may take some effort, though, and I'm not sure of any
existing examples. The 'integr
On 6/5/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/5/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I'm reading 'Better Builds With Maven" correctly, it seems that the
> recommended practice for functional or system integration tests for
webapps
> (i.e. where you deploy the app to a se
On 6/5/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I'm reading 'Better Builds With Maven" correctly, it seems that the
recommended practice for functional or system integration tests for webapps
(i.e. where you deploy the app to a server and then execute HTTP requests
and examine the resul
11 matches
Mail list logo
