Re: "Use Cases" Example Webapp for the Shale proposal

2005-01-04 Thread Craig McClanahan
Indeed, if you set the "jsf.home" property to point at your MyFaces distribution directory, the build.xml script for struts-shale-usecases *should* assemble an application that has all the tweaks needed to use MyFaces instead. Craig On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:29:42 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL

RE: "Use Cases" Example Webapp for the Shale proposal

2005-01-04 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Gary, as Craig pointed out, Shale works with any JSF impl. It comes default with RI, but works also with MyFaces see: http://tinyurl.com/6993m HTH, Matthias > > Is the ViewHandler decoration MyFaces specific - not that it matters? > > Thanks, > Gary > > > > >

Re: "Use Cases" Example Webapp for the Shale proposal

2005-01-04 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:33:49 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for the insight. I have been working with Struts since your > > beginning in the 2nd half of 2000. I aggree with your technology > > assessment and just concentrate on getting the job done. > > > > BaTien >

Re: "Use Cases" Example Webapp for the Shale proposal

2005-01-04 Thread Sean Schofield
> Even if that happens, there will clearly be a transition period for > existing applications. And I will be happy to support transition > users, with the Struts-Faces Integration Library. But, from what I > have seen in the market, Struts is becoming increasingly less relevant > for new applicat

Re: "Use Cases" Example Webapp for the Shale proposal

2005-01-04 Thread gvanmatre
> Thanks for the insight. I have been working with Struts since your > beginning in the 2nd half of 2000. I aggree with your technology > assessment and just concentrate on getting the job done. > > BaTien > DBGROUPS I agree. Thank you for sharing! I really like the automatic mapping of a

Re: "Use Cases" Example Webapp for the Shale proposal

2005-01-04 Thread BaTien Duong
Hello Craig: Thanks for the insight. I have been working with Struts since your beginning in the 2nd half of 2000. I aggree with your technology assessment and just concentrate on getting the job done. BaTien DBGROUPS Craig McClanahan wrote: On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 09:48:32 -0700, BaTien Duong <[EMA

Re: "Use Cases" Example Webapp for the Shale proposal

2005-01-04 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 09:48:32 -0700, BaTien Duong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Craig: > > Good work. Thanks for your effort. We always wish to have more than 24 > hours a day. I wish to have some spare time to get back to this. > > One quick question about the framework: What is the appropri

Re: "Use Cases" Example Webapp for the Shale proposal

2005-01-04 Thread BaTien Duong
Hello Craig: Good work. Thanks for your effort. We always wish to have more than 24 hours a day. I wish to have some spare time to get back to this. One quick question about the framework: What is the appropriate tool to use for configuration in different tiers? I thought Jsf is appropriate in

RE: "Use Cases" Example Webapp for the Shale proposal

2005-01-04 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Struts Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: "Use Cases" Example Webapp for the Shale proposal > > > > > Whatever happened to the proposals to move this JSF > implementation to MyFaces? That would seem to be much more > appropriate. Perhaps it coul

Re: "Use Cases" Example Webapp for the Shale proposal

2005-01-04 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 22:46:03 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Whatever happened to the proposals to move this JSF implementation to > MyFaces? That would seem to be much more appropriate. Perhaps it > could be called JSFShale or FacesShale? What this has to do at all > wi

Re: "Use Cases" Example Webapp for the Shale proposal

2005-01-03 Thread Dakota Jack
Whatever happened to the proposals to move this JSF implementation to MyFaces? That would seem to be much more appropriate. Perhaps it could be called JSFShale or FacesShale? What this has to do at all with Struts has never, in my opinion, been explained, beyond the desire to appropriate t