Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality

2007-06-11 Thread Rainer Hermanns
> [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X] General Availability (GA) I am using this build in 2 inhouse projects without problems. So I think it's time for going GA as well. cheers, Rainer -- Rainer Hermanns aixcept Neupforte 16 52062 Aachen - Germany w: http://a

Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality

2007-06-11 Thread Rene Gielen
[+1] General Availability (GA) Looks good to me, and is desperately needed :) - Rene Am Mi, 6.06.2007, 19:49, schrieb Rainer Hermanns: > The Struts 2.0.8 test build is now available. > > Release notes: > > * http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Release+Notes+2.0.8 > > Distribution: > >

Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality

2007-06-10 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2007/6/7, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Wendy, thanks for reminding me,... Just called the vote :) Ok, I change my vote to +1 to GA (non binding), since the call for struts-annotations vote has been done. Sorry for any incovenience this may cause :-) Antonio ---

Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality

2007-06-09 Thread James Mitchell
+1 for GA Looks great guys!!! -- James Mitchell On Jun 6, 2007, at 1:49 PM, Rainer Hermanns wrote: The Struts 2.0.8 test build is now available. Release notes: * http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Release+Notes+2.0.8 Distribution: * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0

Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality

2007-06-09 Thread Don Brown
Doh, that's +1 for GA On 6/10/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 Everything looks good to me and I've been running a 2.0.8 snapshot in production for a while without issues. Don On 6/8/07, Wendy Smoak < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 6/7/07, Rainer Hermanns < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality

2007-06-09 Thread Don Brown
+1 Everything looks good to me and I've been running a 2.0.8 snapshot in production for a while without issues. Don On 6/8/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/7/07, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wendy, > thanks for reminding me,... Just called the vote :) No proble

Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality

2007-06-07 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 6/7/07, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Wendy, thanks for reminding me,... Just called the vote :) No problem. (And apologies for misspelling your name!) -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fo

Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality

2007-06-07 Thread Rainer Hermanns
Wendy, thanks for reminding me,... Just called the vote :) Rainer Am 07.06.2007 um 15:08 schrieb Wendy Smoak: On 6/7/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2007/6/6, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [X] Leave at test build -1 (non binding, I am only a committer) to a relea

Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality

2007-06-07 Thread Rainer Hermanns
Antonio, as Musachy pointed out, the struts annotations are only a build time dependency. Regarding the release, I just called a vote for Struts Annotations 1.0.2. Rainer > [X] Leave at test build > > -1 (non binding, I am only a committer) to a release, because Struts > 2.0.8 depends

Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality

2007-06-07 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 6/7/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2007/6/6, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [X] Leave at test build -1 (non binding, I am only a committer) to a release, because Struts 2.0.8 depends on Struts Annotations 1.0.2 that is not released. In fact there isn't any releas

Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality

2007-06-07 Thread Musachy Barroso
Struts annotations is a build time dependency. This was discussed before but I can't remember the final outcome. In any case, we could just release S2 annotations (hasn't changed in some time). musachy On 6/7/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2007/6/6, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality

2007-06-07 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2007/6/6, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [X] Leave at test build -1 (non binding, I am only a committer) to a release, because Struts 2.0.8 depends on Struts Annotations 1.0.2 that is not released. In fact there isn't any release of Struts Annotations, how's that? Antonio -

Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality

2007-06-06 Thread mraible
[ X ] General Availability (GA) All tests pass in AppFuse! Also, Rainer sent me the following in an e-mail a month and a half ago. Is it included in the release notes? > The validators.xml files for the upcoming Struts2 2.0.8 needs to be > adjusted. > They are now validated against the b

Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality

2007-06-06 Thread Pedro Herrera
[X] General Availability (GA) Best Regards Pedro Herrera Rainer Hermanns wrote: > > The Struts 2.0.8 test build is now available. > > Release notes: > > * http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Release+Notes+2.0.8 > > Distribution: > > * http://people.apache.org/builds/str

Re: [S2] [VOTE] Struts 2.0.8 Quality

2007-06-06 Thread Ian Roughley
[X] General Availability (GA) Rainer Hermanns wrote: The Struts 2.0.8 test build is now available. Release notes: * http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Release+Notes+2.0.8 Distribution: * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.8/ Maven 2 staging repository: * http://peopl